8 measurements spanning 17 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,983–2,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 14:44
2,984
-6
20 Aug 2026, 14:12
2,990
-2
17 Aug 2026, 22:16
2,992
-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:36
2,993
-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:51
2,994
+7
8 Aug 2026, 11:01
2,987
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
2,988
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
2,988
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 2,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
19 (20 April 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,484
Reactions total
251
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 07s
Average length
2m 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
721 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
347
48.1%
🔥
120
16.6%
⚡
48
6.66%
💯
42
5.83%
🕊
40
5.55%
💅
36
4.99%
😁
35
4.85%
custom 5406919803355023642
32
4.44%
😈
16
2.22%
🎉
5
0.693%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 721reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот пример warm-up, который был у нас с группой учителей по теме "money".
Перед заданием сделали сортинг на фразы-реакции, а потом обсуждали ситуации вместе с ними.
Получилось классно 🤌🏻
Кстати, кто ищет группу для себя, тут подробнее про группы, которые я веду.
Классная лексика, хорошая компания и вдохновение для ваших уроков — гарантированы.
Посмотреть инфу про группы: https://t.me/adeleteaching/876
Мой план по набору до сентября
Сразу хочу сказать, что мне нужны бабки:))
Поэтому я планирую сделать ещё 2 дня рабочими и набрать туда студентов.
В этот раз, я хочу писать в тредс, а параллельно записывать видео для инст, тиктока и ютуб. (одно видео сразу на все площадки). Планы НАПОЛЕОНСКИЕ конечно ахах.
Буду с вами делиться, как идет процесс постепенно. Сейчас я пока раскачиваюсь.
А ещё хочу исправить одну оши…
Как же по-разному могут проходить одни и те же уроки.
Даже если урок продуман, задания классные, есть ещё куча факторов, которые могут его испоганить.
Влияет абсолютно всё.
– ваш настрой
– настроение студентов,
– на сколько они на одной волне
– подача материала
– ретроградный меркурий 🌚
Я сегодня очень довольна. И группа учителей хорошо позанималась (отзыв на скрине), и индивы прям 🔥
Не заметила даже как время пр…
Я сам преподаватель, правда по математике 🔥
В комментариях ему оставила ссылку на видео с тем, как я готовлюсь к уроку. Ну так…чисто для расширения кругозора.
Ещё одно преимущество от занятий, даже если мы уже всё знаем и всё умеем.
Мои teacher-learners вообще-то опытные преподы, с хорошим английским, но как это обычно бывает, у нас есть ошибки с лексикой и произношением.
Знаете же, то самое чувство, когда всю жизнь произносила слово, думая, что все окей, а потом открываешь словарь и у тебя вот такое лицо – 😱
salmon /ˈsæmən/
genre /ˈʒɑːnrə/
subtle /ˈsʌtəl/
suite /swiːt/…
Как перестать откладывать соц.сети/ и переживать «а что люди подумают?»
Делюсь 3мя вещами, которые мне очень помогли :
1. Относиться ко всему как к игре.
Будто это не ты, а персонаж в игре, которым ты управляешь.
Каждое ваше действие – это не про то, как тебя оценят, что-то про тебя подумают, а про +2 очка к опыту.
Нет реакции от людей? Это не мы неинтересные и пишем кринж, а просто надо попробовать чуть по-дру…
❤39🔥7🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @adeleteaching. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🟢 ADELE // Teachers' lounge” (@adeleteaching), 2,984 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adeleteaching.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.