9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,483–3,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 21:08
3,506
-7
24 Aug 2026, 20:56
3,513
-2
21 Aug 2026, 06:25
3,515
+21
17 Aug 2026, 23:33
3,494
+7
14 Aug 2026, 16:25
3,487
-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:57
3,495
+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:41
3,491
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:32
3,492
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:26
3,492
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 3,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
17 (3 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,073
Reactions total
122
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,102 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
576
52.3%
❤🔥
269
24.4%
🔥
139
12.6%
🥰
38
3.45%
😍
31
2.81%
💘
22
2.00%
🍓
15
1.36%
🆒
9
0.817%
👍
3
0.272%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adelaida_bdsm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💔 💔💔💔💔💔
Что если посмотреть на тему не снизу, а сверху?💔
напоминаю, что в этой рубрике мой Хозяин отвечает на вопросы, где-то я помогаю чуть больше раскрыть его ответ
💔Здравствуйте! Можете дать совет? Я предложила парню попробовать BDSM. Он согласился, но ничего об этом не знает.
Я хочу попросить именно о вашем личном опыте: как вы пришли к этой теме, что читали, какие сайты, форумы, каналы, лекции, блоги и книги …
🎀Даже лаская себя и кончая одна, я полностью в Его власти.🎀
Чем больше времени проходит с последней встречи, тем сложнее становится. Тем сильнее становится голод. Единственное, что можно удовлетворить самостоятельно, это зарождающееся возбуждение...
От всех картинок в голове, от всех фантазий, от всех воспоминаний и даже просто диалогов о том, как было и как будет, о желаниях уже хочется, поджав губы, застонать. С …
Время от встречи до встречи проходит почти всегда по одному сценарию.
🤩Сначала я встречаюсь с грустью от разлуки: я слишком быстро привыкаю к тому, что Хозяин рядом, а возвращаться в "обычную" жизнь порой неприятно из-за различных проблем, о которых за время встречи я забываю. Да и... Снова нужно ждать. Ожидать новую встречу и быть друг без друга.
🤩За грустью идут воспоминания. Я раз за разом прогоняю в своей голов…
💔💔 💔💔💔💔💔
Что если посмотреть на тему не снизу, а сверху?💔
💔здравствуйте! извините за сложный вопрос, но возможно вы сможете мне помочь 🥺
подскажите, пожалуйста, как ввести человека в тему..? мой партнер знает о моих предпочтениях и не против пробовать новое, но он не совсем разделяет мою любовь к унижению или доминированию (мне бы хотелось, чтобы он попробовал быть верхним), опять же он не против пробовать, но прос…
💔💔 💔💔💔💔💔
Что если посмотреть на тему не снизу, а сверху?💔
на какие-то вопросы ответ приведен в формате "интервью", то есть так, как я зачитывала эти вопросы и что-то уточняла
💔что было самым сложным, что неожиданным в теме?
⚫: Да, даже не знаю. Наверное, понять и принять это всё. Научиться спокойнее относиться к разным "ужасным на первый взгляд" вещам. Понять, что все люди разные, и то, что хорошо одному, совсем н…
🤩Сегодня наш праздник. 24 июля, 24.07 или 24/7, как и тематический лайфстайл. Тот самый день, когда можно лишний раз напомнить себе, за что и почему каждый из нас выбрал тему.
🤩за честность и доверие
🤩за удовольствие и боль
🤩за грубость и нежность
🤩за контроль и уязвимость.
Будьте бережными друг к другу, не бойтесь своих желаний, доверяйте и слушайте друг друга. Всем добра, любви, невероятного удовольствия, вкусных…
Что если посмотреть на тему не снизу, а сверху?
Я стараюсь по максимуму описывать всё, что со мной происходит, всё, что я чувствую, и все те эмоции, которые испытываю. Но это тот максимум, который я могу дать вам самостоятельно. Ведь чтобы полностью раскрыть взаимодействия в этих тематических отношениях должен быть и другой взгляд - тот, что всегда напротив, что видит всё под другим углом, видит меня так, как не виж…
Инвентаризация девайсов и секс-игрушек.
Все фотографии в комментариях.
Wax-play:
💗Самая очевидная часть коллекции. Как в начале своего тематического пути зацепилась за свечи, так в этом всём и остаются. 15 полноценных свечей и еще 5, которые свое почти отгорели. Диапазон температур от 45 до 70. В основном у меня обычные столбики, но есть и фигурные-силуэтные свечи. В цветовой палитре: розовый, фиолетовый, синий, бел…
🤎Рубрика "Вопрос-Ответ"🤎
Всем большое спасибо за сообщения и вопросы.
1️⃣Ты постоянно ощущаешь себя нижней в отношениях или только на экшенах?
Постоянно. Для меня это невероятно важно, мне нравится чувствовать свою принадлежность к нему, без этого ощущения было бы "пусто" на душе. Скажем так, будь это восприятие себя исключительно сессионным, то не было бы той "магии" и тех ощущений, что присутствуют в наших с Хо…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩И погода, и экшен выводили ужасно организм. Как только меня начало отпускать от конкретных ощущений, и я начала чувствовать всё свое тело и то, как ужасно вспотела, я резко схватилась за края топа.
— Ужасно жарко.
Я коротко обозначила, снимая с себя топ, оголяя грудь. Сразу стало чуть легче. Я прикрыла глаза, чтобы насладиться легкой прохладой, пока Хозяин не притягивает меня к себе.
Его ладони мяг…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @adelaida_bdsm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 938,874 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Adelaida BDSM | 18+” (@adelaida_bdsm), 3,506 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adelaida_bdsm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.