Channel
@add_up
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
65,511subscribers
-266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002469268888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @add_up |
| Description | AddUp - CFD broker Forex • Metals • Indices • Stocks • Energies News, analysis, updates. addup.com | @addup_chat Risk Warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/add_up |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 65,511 | -55 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 65,566 | -36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 65,602 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 65,642 | -38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 65,680 | -50 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 65,730 | -45 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 65,775 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 65,777 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
87 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 29 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 24.1% | |
| ✍ | 16 | 18.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 11.5% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 8.05% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @add_up. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2025 to 30 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Stages of a trader: 1. "This is easy money" 2. "Wait, this is hard" 3. "I've lost everything" 4. "Back to basics" 5. "Okay, now I get it" 6. Repeat steps 2-5 Where are you?
❤4❤🔥1
Moving your stop loss to "give it room" = Lying to yourself about being wrong. Your original stop was there for a reason. If you need to move it, you shouldn't have entered.
❤2
Why we chose MetaTrader 5. - 21 timeframes (not just 9) - Built-in economic calendar - Depth of market visible - One-click trading - Multi-asset: Forex, Stocks, Commodities in one place It's the industry standard so there's no learning curve. If you traded before, you already know how it works.
Scalping or Swing trading? Choose your style. Defend it below.
❤3❤🔥1
The charts are just the surface - real lessons are emotional. Every blown account teaches you something books never could. Walking away from a setup that looks perfect but feels wrong. Trusting your plan even after two losses in a row. Admitting you're wrong before the stop hits. Sitting with discomfort instead of clicking buttons just to do something. Growth happens in losses. Not because losing is good, but becau…
❤2
A strategy that works only in perfect conditions is fragile. Markets constantly change-volatility, structure, momentum rarely stay the same for long. Strong strategies aren't perfect. They're adaptable and traded with realistic expectations. Knowing when NOT to trade is just as important as knowing when to engage.
Short-term results are a poor judge of decision quality. One win doesn't confirm skill. One loss doesn't invalidate a good setup. Trading is a probability game. Single trade outcomes are mostly noise—execution consistency is the signal. Focus on process, not outcomes.
⚡2❤1
Calm is often mistaken for hesitation. In reality, it's a sign of preparation. Traders who feel rushed are reacting, not executing. A calm process comes from clear rules, defined risk, and accepting losses before entering. When pressure is removed, decision-making improves.
⚡4
Overtrading rarely feels like a mistake in the moment. It feels like "staying active" and "not missing opportunities." But most losing days come from too many average trades instead of waiting for the few good ones. Pros don't try to trade more. They filter harder. Sometimes the best trade is not taking one at all.
✍1
Most traders spend hours looking for the perfect entry. Very few spend the same time planning their exit. Entries feel exciting. Exits feel uncomfortable-that's why they're often improvised. Consistent results come from treating exits as part of the strategy, not an afterthought.
❤2
What you won't pay at AddUp: - Commissions: $0 - Swap fees: $0 - Hidden conditions: $0 What you pay: Spreads from 1.0 pips. That's it. That's the model.
👍4❤1
One account. Five markets. Forex - majors, minors, exotics Metals - Gold, Silver, Platinum Stocks - Apple, Tesla, NVIDIA Indices - S&P 500, NASDAQ, DAX Energies - Oil, Natural Gas Diversify without switching platforms.
☃4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @add_up. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is Prop Trading the Future of Crypto Careers?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 30 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 110,536 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AddUp” (@add_up), 65,511 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/add_up.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.