Channel
@adcloaking_Googleads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002499869021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adcloaking_Googleads |
| Created | Between 1 December 2024 and 30 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adcloaking_Googleads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 131 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 125 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 120 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 120 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
103 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 31.1% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 24.3% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 10.7% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.91% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adcloaking_Googleads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Why Most Google Ads Campaigns Fail in the Learning Phase Most people judge a campaign by how much was spent. Experienced media buyers judge it by how efficiently the budget is being used. This campaign is still in its learning phase, yet with just CHF 80.65 spent, it has already generated 83.6K impressions and 107 targeted clicks. The point isn’t to impress you with numbers. The point is that getting quality tra…
❤2
Getting consistent WhatsApp leads while keeping budgets around 50–80 CHF daily takes more structure than most people realize. A lot of advertisers can run ads. Very few know how to: • keep CPC low • maintain stable delivery • filter weak traffic • and still generate quality clicks consistently That’s usually the difference between random campaigns and campaigns that can actually scale. This is also why I share ca…
🔥4
Posted without readable text
Cloak ads| Google Cloak | Crypto Cloaking | Facebook Cloaking | Tiktok Cloaking | Gambling Cloaking | Dating ad | Adult Cloak | pinned a photo
Posted without readable text
🔥7
Why We Don’t Constantly Post Payment Screenshots In this industry, screenshots alone don’t prove much anymore. Chats can be edited. Numbers can be manipulated. Dashboards can be fabricated. That’s why we prefer real verification instead of building the channel around “proof” posts. When serious clients want confirmation, we do: • live calls • walkthroughs • real conversations about campaigns and structure Becaus…
👌3👏3❤1
Full-Stack Ads Service for Risky Niches 🚀 Sell verified ad accounts for gaming, gambling, crypto, and other high-risk niches. Our service includes: Verified Ad Accounts: Meta, TikTok, Google, and more Whitepage + Cloaking: Ensure your ads fly under the radar UGC Scripts & Creatives: Engaging content that converts Promotion & Traffic Setup: Expertly managed for max ROI Clean Setup: Better approvals, better ROAS DM n…
Let handle your campaign, both whitehat and blackhat.
Posted without readable text
🔥5👏3❤1
What Cloaking Actually Does (And What Most People Don’t Notice) Most people hear “cloaking” and think it’s just about hiding a page. That’s usually where the misunderstanding starts. If you really look at how campaigns behave, it becomes obvious something else is going on. Traffic doesn’t move in a straight line. It gets interpreted first. Every click carries signals. Not just where it came from, but how it beha…
🔥5❤4
What Actually Happens Between the Click and Your Money Page Many advertisers assume that once someone clicks an ad, they are sent directly to the offer. But in practice, that process is not as direct as it seems. Between the click and the final landing page, there is a decision layer where traffic is evaluated before being fully delivered. This evaluation is not visible, but it plays a major role in how campaign…
🔥5❤3
Why New Ad Accounts Feel Unstable Even With Correct Setup Many advertisers assume that once a campaign is set up correctly, delivery should behave consistently. But fresh ad accounts rarely work that way. Even with the right targeting, creatives, and budgets, new accounts often show unstable patterns such as: • Traffic spikes and sudden drops • Delayed delivery • Random review triggers • Inconsistent conversion b…
❤6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @adcloaking_Googleads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cloak ads| Google Cloak | Crypto Cloaking | Facebook Cloaking | Tiktok Cloaking | Gambling Cloaking | Dating ad | Adult Cloak |” (@adcloaking_Googleads), 131 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adcloaking_Googleads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.