Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alia Bhatt ๐Ÿ’‹๐Ÿ’‹

Channel

Alia Bhatt ๐Ÿ’‹๐Ÿ’‹

@actress_aliabhatt

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

10,937subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002241840386
TypeChannel
Username@actress_aliabhatt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/actress_aliabhatt

Growth

10,86410,95610,9107 August 2026 โ€” 10,917 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 10,925 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 10,942 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 10,868 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 10,867 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 10,864 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 10,893 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 10,917 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 10,956 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 10,937 subscribers10,9377 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 10,850โ€“10,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:3410,937-19
16 Aug 2026, 06:0410,956+39
14 Aug 2026, 16:0410,917+24
13 Aug 2026, 06:5710,893+29
12 Aug 2026, 06:2410,864-3
11 Aug 2026, 04:4210,867-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:1010,868-74
9 Aug 2026, 02:0110,942+17
8 Aug 2026, 01:0210,925+8
7 Aug 2026, 19:1610,917first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
9.56%
avg views รท 10,937 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held101 (13 July 2026 โ€“ 15 August 2026)
Views total88,853
Reactions total2,404
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,218 reactions across 91 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐ŸŒ1,51347.0%
โค81825.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ42513.2%
๐Ÿ’‹35911.2%
๐Ÿ˜˜200.622%
๐Ÿ˜150.466%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ140.435%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ140.435%
๐Ÿพ70.218%
๐Ÿคช70.218%
โšก60.186%
๐Ÿฅฐ50.155%
๐ŸŒญ40.124%
๐Ÿ‘30.093%
๐Ÿ’ฉ30.093%
๐Ÿ˜ก20.062%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.031%
๐Ÿ’˜10.031%
๐Ÿ˜10.031%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3,218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC814 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿผ

๐Ÿ”ฅ15๐ŸŒ8โค5๐Ÿ’‹4

15 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC772 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’•๐Ÿ˜

๐ŸŒ13๐Ÿ”ฅ11โค2๐ŸŒญ1๐Ÿ˜1

15 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC714 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Untie the lace๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅต๐Ÿ™ˆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ12๐ŸŒ9๐Ÿ’‹4โค2

15 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC660 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Lick that back๐Ÿซฆโค๏ธ๐Ÿ’•

๐Ÿ”ฅ11๐ŸŒ6๐Ÿ’‹6โค2

15 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC586 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Uff๐Ÿฅต๐Ÿ’•

๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ’‹8๐ŸŒ6โค2

15 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC598 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿผ๐Ÿซฆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ16๐Ÿ’‹7โค5

15 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC531 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

โค๏ธ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅต

๐Ÿ”ฅ15๐Ÿ’‹11

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @actress_aliabhatt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

What type of posts needed?๐Ÿซถ

  1. Normal32%
  2. Enhanced74%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTCAnonymous Poll185 voters

Alia kiss upscale needed?๐ŸŒ๐Ÿผ

  1. Yes๐Ÿš€88%
  2. No, we are done with it๐Ÿคฅ13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTCAnonymous Poll302 voters

Which aloo pic can go instant 100๐ŸŒ!

  1. Face Card25%
  2. Lips8%
  3. Kissing30%
  4. RRkPk looks23%
  5. Alpha10%
  6. SOTY5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œAlia Bhatt ๐Ÿ’‹๐Ÿ’‹โ€ (@actress_aliabhatt), 10,937 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actress_aliabhatt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.