Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net +594. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,716–19,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 13:17
19,490
-6
9 Nov 2026, 04:00
19,496
-11
7 Nov 2026, 22:14
19,507
-8
6 Nov 2026, 17:36
19,515
-3
5 Nov 2026, 14:00
19,518
-3
4 Nov 2026, 13:21
19,521
+2
3 Nov 2026, 15:27
19,519
+4
2 Nov 2026, 13:30
19,515
-9
1 Nov 2026, 09:56
19,524
-3
31 Oct 2026, 07:05
19,527
-14
30 Oct 2026, 08:17
19,541
-5
29 Oct 2026, 06:36
19,546
-5
28 Oct 2026, 04:41
19,551
-2
26 Oct 2026, 05:37
19,553
-1
25 Oct 2026, 04:10
19,554
+13
24 Oct 2026, 01:38
19,541
-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:45
19,547
-37
22 Oct 2026, 00:44
19,584
-5
20 Oct 2026, 17:01
19,589
+4
19 Oct 2026, 14:04
19,585
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.70%
avg views ÷ 19,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
915
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
48 (9 October 2025 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
10,069
Reactions total
153
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
11
Videos
7
Links
38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 57s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,048 reactions across 46 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,420
46.6%
🔥
1,067
35.0%
👍
422
13.8%
🥰
50
1.64%
👏
20
0.656%
💩
15
0.492%
🤣
10
0.328%
🤮
9
0.295%
👎
7
0.23%
💯
7
0.23%
🖕
7
0.23%
👨💻
5
0.164%
⚡
4
0.131%
🫡
4
0.131%
😁
1
0.033%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
How high can you climb with up to 2.5X points? 👾
ActionFi × SweepGlobal BONUS POINTS WEEK is ON until November 16.
Earn 2.5X points on:
- Play Rugs Daily
- Play Up/Down Daily
Earn 2X points on:
- Play Sweepbird
- Create an X Post About Sweep
Two new tasks just landed. Check them out:
- Purchase $75 of SWEEP
- Reach $750 in Game Volume
Your contribution this week could dramatically shake up the leaderboard. Compl…
THE SECOND SWEEP x ACTIONFI $150k LEADERBOARD IS HERE! 👾⚡️
The 2nd SWEEP leaderboard is officially in, and the competition is just getting started!
Remember, the campaign runs until December 25th, so there's still plenty of time to climb.
Complete your SWEEP ActionFi tasks here:
https://train.actionmodel.com/actionfi/sweepfinance
PS: If you've earned enough points but aren't appearing on the leaderboard, please e…
The final SIXR x ActionFi leaderboard is officially LIVE! 👾
After an incredible campaign with a $100,000 reward pool, we're excited to announce the final results of our first major ActionFi campaign!
A huge congratulations to all our winners and everyone who participated, completed tasks and helped make this campaign a success!
Finished in the top 200? Check your email for your reward allocation and next steps.
D…
THE FIRST SWEEP x ACTIONFI LEADERBOARD IS HERE! 👾⚡️
The first SWEEP leaderboard is officially in, and the competition is just getting started!
Remember, the campaign runs until December 25th, so there's still plenty of time to climb.
DOUBLE POINTS THIS WEEKEND!
We've added new SWEEP tasks today, offering double points for this weekend only!
Complete your SWEEP ActionFi tasks here:
https://train.actionmodel.com/a…
Your weekend plans just got a points upgrade 👾
ActionFi × Sweep DOUBLE POINTS WEEKEND starts tomorrow.
From Friday through Tuesday, earn 2X POINTS on these new daily tasks added:
- Play Rugs Daily
- Play Up/Down Daily
Competing for a share of the $150,000 in $SWEEP rewards? This is your chance to earn more points and push higher on the leaderboard.
Play the games.
Complete your daily tasks.
Verify your actions.
…
SWEEP: PRESALE (Purchase $25 & $250 task) VESTING vs. ACTIONFI LEADERBOARD AIRDROP REWARDS VESTING ⬇️
We want to clarify the difference between the SWEEP Phase 3 Presale and the SWEEP x ActionFi Leaderboard Airdrop, as both have different token vesting schedules.
1. SWEEP Phase 3 Presale
Phase 3 (LIVE)
• Token Price: $0.05 per SWEEP
• Total Allocation: 30,000,000 SWEEP
• Hard Cap: $1,500,000
• Minimum Contribution…
SIXR x ACTIONFI WEEK 7 LEADERBOARD IS HERE! 👾⚡
The SIXR campaign is entering its final stretch, and the leaderboard is heating up!
We've also completed a thorough review of all tasks following the streak change that reset in season 2.
Here's what you need to know:
✅ No points have been lost or removed.
✅ All SIXR tasks and streak rewards have been reviewed and verified.
✅ The leaderboard accurately reflects eli…
ACTIONFI × SWEEP: A SPECIAL GIFT FOR OUR COMMUNITY!
$25 PROMO REWARD! 👾
Our friends at SWEEP are giving the first 2,500 eligible ActionFi users an exclusive reward!
Here's how to claim:
1. Play SWEEP's two new games.
2. Reach $100 in total in-game volume.
3. Go to Promotions on SWEEP.
4. Enter code ACTION25 to claim your reward!
Limited to the first 2,500 eligible users.
This is a special bonus for our communit…
👾 SWEEP x ACTIONFI IS LIVE!
The biggest campaign in ActionFi history is officially here! 🔥
We're teaming up with SWEEP for a massive $150,000 reward pool across 10 weeks.
Here's how you can get involved 👇
🏆 $100,000 — Leaderboard Rewards
🎰 $30,000 — Lottery Rewards
🎨 $20,000 — Creators & Ambassadors
How to get started:
1. Sign up for Action Model
2. Download the Browser Extension
3. Open ActionFi
4. Start com…
👾 A NEW $100K+ REWARD POOL IS COMING TO ACTIONFI THIS FRIDAY 👾
Our next partner is officially locked in.
And they are bringing the biggest reward pool in ActionFi history.
We are talking about more than $100k in rewards for the Action Model community.
But we're not stopping there...
We want to keep leveling up, bringing bigger prize pools, securing bigger campaigns, and giving everyone something exciting to look…
Streak Update 🫡
We have an important update regarding the affected SIXR streaks.
Unfortunately, the SIXR team was not able to resolve the issue on their side. Rather than leave the community waiting, we decided to step in and come up with a solution that rewards everyone who continued using ActionFi and participating throughout the situation.
What has changed?
1. Previous daily streaks have been removed
The prev…
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @actionmodelupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @actionmodelupdates as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Action Model Updates” (@actionmodelupdates), 19,490 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actionmodelupdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.