✅ خانومها! شما میتونین معمار اقتصادی خانوادهتون باشین، حتی اگه درآمد شخصی نداشته باشین ویس بالا مخصوص هر خانومی هست که توی این کاناله❤️🔥 برای ارتباط با ما، عدد «۱» رو بفرست👇 @sharifiacademy @sharifiacademy
❤7

Channel
@actionfatemesharifi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,172subscribers
-466 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002133329725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @actionfatemesharifi |
| Description | به کانال اصلی من خوش اومدی😎 جایی برای یادگیری نکاتی که هم به درد زندگی شخصیت میخوره و هم کسب و کارت❤️🔥 هر روز؛ یک نکته اکانت پشتیبانی: @Sharifiacademy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/actionfatemesharifi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 17,172 | -13 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:26 | 17,185 | -17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:09 | 17,202 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:30 | 17,216 | -28 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:17 | 17,244 | -18 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:26 | 17,262 | -15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:35 | 17,277 | -20 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 17,297 | -24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 17,321 | -24 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 17,345 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 17,359 | -25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 17,384 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 17,399 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 17,406 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 17,410 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 17,408 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 17,413 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 17,415 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 17,429 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 17,441 | first reading |
70 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (12 July 2026 – 15 October 2026) |
| Views total | 25,486 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
757 reactions across 54 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 430 | 56.8% | |
| 👍 | 151 | 19.9% | |
| 🤣 | 46 | 6.08% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 5.55% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 4.49% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 2.25% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 1.45% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.19% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 1.06% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.528% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.264% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.132% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.132% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.132% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 757 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅ خانومها! شما میتونین معمار اقتصادی خانوادهتون باشین، حتی اگه درآمد شخصی نداشته باشین ویس بالا مخصوص هر خانومی هست که توی این کاناله❤️🔥 برای ارتباط با ما، عدد «۱» رو بفرست👇 @sharifiacademy @sharifiacademy
❤7
مسئولیت تصمیمات مالی توی خونه به عهده کیه؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1️⃣ شمایی که اینجا هستی، مجردی یا متاهل؟👇😇
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
‼️وقتی ترس از تورم، برای پولت تصمیم میگیره ✅و یه نوع سرمایهگذاری که توی هیاهوی خرید طلا و دلار، نباید فراموشش کنیم برای ارتباط با ما عدد «۱» رو بفرست👇 @sharifiacademy
❤2
جالبه که وقتی قیمت طلا بالا میره، بعضیهامون عجله میکنیم بخریم، بعضیهامون منتظر میمونیم و بعضیها هم نمیدونیم چه تصمیمی بگیریم! ⁉️اما یه سؤال: از کجا بفهمیم تصمیمی که داریم میگیریم، واقعاً به نفع وضعیت مالیمونه یا فقط میخوایم از نگرانیِ جا موندن خلاص بشیم؟ توی ویس بعدی میخوام درباره یه اشتباه مهم صحبت کنم که توی شرایط تورمی ممکنه مرتکبش بشیم. 👇👇❤️🔥
❤1
وقتی میبینی قیمت طلا چند روز پشت سر هم بالا رفته، اولین واکنشت چیه
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
یه سری از بچه ها، حتی با نشتی گیری تونستن طلا بخرن، یا ضربه گیرشون رو پر کنن وقتی میگم توی کلاس حدود ۳۵ نشتی مالی رو میگیم، شما حساب کن مجموع پولی که آزاد میشه حتی کمم نیست گاهی❤️🔥 اگر هنوز عضو کلاس سواد پولی نشدی، عدد ۱ رو بفرست به ایدی زیر تا راهنماییت کنیم👇👇👇 @sharifiacademy @sharifiacademy
وقتی چارچوب مالیت رو مشخص کردی، بعد یک ماه که رفتارت رو بررسی کرد، بهت میگه چه نشتی هایی داشتی 👀
❤2
تازه این زمانیه که بچه ها هنوز اپلیکیشن مانیرا رو نداشتن، الان که دیگه اونم هست که یه بخشیش نشتی گیری😁🔥
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔘پس عزیزان مهم ترین راهکار برا حل کردن نشتی های مالی اینه که الگوهای خودم رو بشناسم اینکه بفهمیم چه موقعیتهایی باعث میشن بیبرنامه خرج کنیم؟ کجاها احساسی تصمیم میگیری؟ چه تله های ذهنی داشتیم از قبل؟؟ مثلا من دوستی داشتم که هر وقت با همکارش بحثش میشد میرفت کارتشو خالی میکرد و جالبه بهت بگم که وقتی این نشتیها رو میشناسی و جلوشو میگیری، بخش زیادی از پولت آزاد میشه که باورت نمیشه‼️
👍4🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @actionfatemesharifi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
مسئولیت تصمیمات مالی توی خونه به عهده کیه؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1️⃣ شمایی که اینجا هستی، مجردی یا متاهل؟👇😇
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
وقتی میبینی قیمت طلا چند روز پشت سر هم بالا رفته، اولین واکنشت چیه
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اون خریدی که بعدش پشیمون شدی رو یادته؟ موقع خرید چه حسی داشتی؟
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⁉️اگه برگردی به۲ سال پیش و فقط یک گزینه داشته باشی، چه توصیه ای به خودت میکنی؟
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر امروز از محل کارت استعفا بدی، فکر میکنی میتونی با همین مهارتها حقوق بیشتری بگیری؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اصلی فاطمه شریفی” (@actionfatemesharifi), 17,172 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actionfatemesharifi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.