Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

آکادمی سئو وبسیما

@academywebsima

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,703subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586104265
TypeChannel
Username@academywebsima
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/academywebsima

Growth

1,7031,7081,705.57 August 2026 — 1,707 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,707 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,708 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,707 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,703 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,702–1,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:241,703-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:311,707-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:551,708+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:461,707no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:331,707first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.3%
avg views ÷ 1,703 subscribers
Avg views / post
584
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held17 (27 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total4,673
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6944.2%
4931.4%
🔥159.62%
👏148.97%
👎42.56%
🤩31.92%
🎉10.641%
😱10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC349 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ظرفیت رنسانس ۲ رو به پایانه می‌دونید که رویداد حضوری محدودیت ثبت‌نام داره و فقط ۱۲ تا صندلی خالی تا تکمیل ظرفیت داریم. پس اگر نگاهِ به آینده داری و دنبال تکنیک‌های مدرن‌تری برای سئو هستی این فرصت رو از دست نده: https://websima.academy/ai/rn2/ آدرس تهران، خیابان کارگر شمالی، پردیس شمالی دانشگاه تهران، پارک علم و فناوری، سالن همایش مرکز توسعه کسب و کار صنعت ۴ زمان پنجشنبه ۸ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵ | ساعت ۱۶:۰۰ الی ۲۰:۰۰

1

27 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC655 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دوست داری بدونی پشت پرده بازار رپورتاژ آگهی چه خبره؟ 🚫 بی‌پرده‌ترین ارائه در حوزه رپورتاژ آگهی رو میتونی توی ویدیوهای رنسانس ۱ ببینی https://t.me/+IhibScutgrc3ODc0 از فردا باید منتظر یه موج حمله جدید از پلت‌فرم‌های وسط‌باز و گرگ‌فلوئنسرها باشم 😎

8

25 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC890 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀 رویداد حضوری رنسانس ۲؛ فروش از صفحه دوم گوگل در #رنسانس ۱ مفصل درباره این صحبت کردیم که چرا نباید بودجه کارفرما رو صرف رپورتاژ کنیم! سوالی که برای بچه‌ها پیش اومد این بود که: خب پس این بودجه رو دقیقاً کجا و چطوری هزینه کنیم؟ توی رویداد #حضوری رنسانس ۲ قراره دقیقاً به همین سوال جواب بدیم. می‌خوایم یاد بگیریم پولی که از خرید رپورتاژ ذخیره می‌شه رو چطور تو مسیری سرمایه‌گذاری کنیم که برای کسب‌و‌کار «ارزش واقعی» و «

🤩21👏1

23 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC498 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اما من این‌طوری بهش نگاه نمی‌کنم تو اون ۱۵ دقیقه هیچ صدایی از زمین نمیومد و کسی هم سمت محوطه‌ش نرفته بود. حتی صدای تماشاچی‌ها هم قطع شده بود. همه‌چیز نشون می‌داد #شرایط_عوض_شده اما اون همچنان کار قبلیش رو ادامه می‌داد. این اسمش تعهد نیست. بیشتر نوعی ضعف در انطباق‌پذیریه. حالا چرا این داستان رو تعریف کردم؟ چون الان همین صحنه رو با نگاه آدم‌ها و کسب و کارها به #هوش_مصنوعی می‌بینیم. خیلی‌ها هنوز در برابر استفاده ا

👍9

23 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC413 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

۱۵ دقیقه بعد از اینکه همه رفته بودن، اون هنوز تو دروازه ایستاده بود… سال ۱۹۳۷ بازی چارلتون و چلسی. مه اون‌قدر غلیظ شد که داور بازی رو تعطیل کرد. اما سم بارترام دروازه‌بان چارلتون (بی‌خبر از همه‌جا) یه ربع تمام تو دروازه مونده بود تا اینکه یه پلیس اومد و بهش گفت بازی خیلی وقته تموم شده! این داستان رو تو سمینارها و اینستاگرام زیاد تعریف می‌کنن و مضمونش هم اینه که ببینید چقدر #متعهد بوده. اما من این‌طوری بهش نگاه نم

👍3👎1

21 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC469 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💸 ۳ تا اشتباهی که ۹۰٪ فریلنسرها موقع قیمت دادن انجام می‌دن اشتباه اول: حسی قیمت می‌دن. «به نظرم پنج تومن خوبه.» عددی که پشتش منطق نیست، با اولین چونه‌زنی مشتری می‌شکنه. اشتباه دوم: خودشون رو با ارزون‌ترین‌ها مقایسه می‌کنن. همیشه یکی ارزون‌تر هست. جنگ سرِ قیمت فقط بازنده داره. اشتباه سوم: هزینه‌های پروژه رو با دستمزدشون قاطی می‌کنن. وسط پروژه سرِ رپورتاژ آگهی و تولید محتوا غافلگیر می‌شن. ⚠️ اگه این اشتباهات برات آ

👍6🎉1

19 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC856 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بچه‌ها یه پروژه سئو بهم خورده، قیمت چقدر بدم؟ واقعیت اینه که سئو قیمت ثابتی نداره! عددی که اعلام می‌کنیم به ابعاد پروژه ، میزان تخصصی بودن موضوع و ترافیک کاری خودمون بستگی داره. البته در بعضی موارد سختی رقابت تو اون صنعت رو هم در نظر می‌گیریم. به جای اینکه دنبال یک عدد مشخص باشیم، بهتره قبل از قیمت دادن چنین سوالاتی رو از خودمون بپرسیم: ❓ قیمت این پروژه برای فردی با تخصص من چقدره؟ ❓ قراره هر ماه چند ساعت رو این

👍7

19 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC543 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کسی برای استفاده از هوش مصنوعی به شما پول نمیده نه برای تولید محتوا، نه برای سناریوهای خفن با n8n و نه برای طراحی لندینگ‌پیج… الکس هرمزی یه جمله خوبی داره که میگه: مردم محصول شما رو نمی‌خرن! اونا نتیجه‌ای که اون محصول براشون خلق می‌کنه رو می‌خرن. فرض کن رفتی آژانس مسافرتی و فروشنده به جای اینکه از زیبایی‌های مقصد و راحتی سفر بگه، نقشه فنی موتور هواپیما رو بذاره جلوت و دو ساعت از آلیاژ بدنه تعریف کنه! احتمالاً تو

👏112

15 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC701 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

فردا جلسه حضوری بوت‌کمپ #سایبورگ رو داریم و دیدن این پست یه نشونه‌ست که توی مسیر درستی هستیم...

10

14 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC737 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

40 درصد رزومه‌ها رو نخونده رد کردم! چند هفته پیش یکی از دوستام برای استخدام کارشناس #سئو آگهی داده بود و ازم خواست توی بررسی رزومه‌ها کمکش کنم. یه چیز از همون نگاه اول توی ذوقم زد! عنوان‌‌های شغلی. چندتاش رو اینجا می‌ذارم (کاملا واقعی): افسر ارشد امنیت و هوش مصنوعی و برنامه‌نویسی مدیر سئو و مشاور دیجیتال مارکتینگ برنامه‌نویس تحت وب – وردپرس‌کار – عکاس کمک حسابدار یا کمک حسابرس طراحی سایت (سئو و تولید محتوا)

🔥114👎3👍2👏2

11 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,100 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

فکر می‌کنید تولید محتوا با هوش مصنوعی مجانیه؟ واقعیت اینه که نوشتن هر مقاله با هوش مصنوعی تقریبا ۳۰۰ هزار تومن براتون آب می‌خوره! (تازه این فقط پول توکن و APIهاست...) منم اولش مثل خیلی‌ها فکر می‌کردم اگه کار رو بسپرم به AI، هزینه‌ها خیلی میاد پایین. اما تجربه اخیرم تو طراحی و اجرای یه اتومیشن تولید محتوا با #n8n کلاً دیدم رو تغییر داد. برای نگارش مقاله کاری که خودم انجام می‌دادم رو با یک سیستم دو مرحله‌ای پیاده‌ساز

👍92🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @academywebsima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 433,674 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist
@Playlistpodcas · 152,279
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آکادمی سئو وبسیما” (@academywebsima), 1,703 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academywebsima.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.