Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Академия индустрии моды

Channel

Академия индустрии моды

@academymody

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,960subscribers

-196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001490505541
TypeChannel
Username@academymody
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/academymody

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,96015,15615,0587 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,150 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,146 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,140 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,130 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,110 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,103 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,097 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,091 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,084 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,076 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,063 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,049 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,045 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,041 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,038 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,039 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,035 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,030 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,028 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,024 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,022 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,018 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,009 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,997 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,988 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,982 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,973 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,966 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,960 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,931–15,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:1514,960-6
16 Sept 2026, 23:5514,966-7
15 Sept 2026, 00:2114,973-9
13 Sept 2026, 11:1814,982-6
11 Sept 2026, 13:5714,988-9
8 Sept 2026, 18:5614,997-12
5 Sept 2026, 09:4015,009-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:0015,018-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:4215,022-2
1 Sept 2026, 03:5815,024-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:0215,028-2
30 Aug 2026, 02:0315,030-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:1715,035-4
28 Aug 2026, 04:4615,039+1
27 Aug 2026, 05:2515,038-3
26 Aug 2026, 06:5315,041-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:0315,045-4
23 Aug 2026, 23:0615,049-14
22 Aug 2026, 09:2315,063-13
20 Aug 2026, 20:2515,076first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.73%
avg views ÷ 14,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held49 (23 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total5,311
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 26 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5944.7%
🔥4634.8%
👍2015.2%
❤‍🔥64.55%
💘10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC207 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❓ Изделие сидит идеально в базовом размере. А в остальных? Если вы хоть раз думали «ну, я построю на базовый размер, а дальше как-нибудь: или построю на каждый следующий размер или САПР сделает автоматически градацию...» — обязательно дочитайте. Самая коварная штука в проектировании лекал: то, что идеально сидит на 46-м, может не так идеально сидеть в 52 или 42. И замечают это обычно слишком поздно — когда партия

3

31 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC260 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⚠️ Методика, которая идеальна для индивидуального пошива, может подвести вас при работе с брендом. Если вы задумывались о переходе от пошива на заказ к работе с брендами — сохраните этот пост, чтобы не потратить время и нервы Представьте: у вас есть любимая методика. Понятная, привычная, изделия садятся как влитые. Кажется — бери и запускай на поток. Но есть одна деталь, которая решает всё. Когда вы шьёте на ко

3

31 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC258 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔥 В пошиве на заказ всё понятно. А как строить для бренда — тут многие и зависают В индивидуальном пошиве всё привычно: сняли размерные признаки — сели строить. Шаг за шагом. А теперь нужно построить лекала для бренда и массового производства. И тут возникает вопрос: с чего начать? И вот что удивляет новичков: опытный конструктор, работающий в САПР или на производстве, почти никогда не строит с нуля. У него есть база

27 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC441 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

«Хочу, чтобы было вот так» — фраза, после которой у конструктора только начинается настоящая работа Дизайнер или владелец бренда может прекрасно видеть модель у себя в голове: — Он видит силуэт, объём, форму, посадку. И может сказать: «Хочу, чтобы было вот так». Но для конструктора этого недостаточно! Даже, если клиент вам в см говорит, где сколько хочет- это еще ничего не значит Потому что одни и те же ф

9

26 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC450 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему хороший конструктор не начинает работу с брендом с лекал Представьте: бренд присылает фотографию жакета и пишет: «Хотим примерно такой. Сделаете лекала?» Первый шаг понятен: открыть САПР и начать искать подходящую основу или (если строите вручную) начать искать методику построения похожей модели 😅 Но профессиональный конструктор в этот момент делает совсем другое. Потому что по одной фотографии ещё н

6🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC546 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

🎙️»Боюсь, что мне уже поздно начинать. Мне 40/50+» -история Суриковой Галины Ивановны , замечательного преподавателя на кафедре Конструирования швейных изделий в Текстильном институте -история нашей выпускницы Светланы Если хотите получить консультацию по программе обучения и условиям участия — напишите в личные сообщения @AcademMody 📌Подписывайтесь: Telegram | Ig | VK | YouTube Обучение | Консультации

🔥61

23 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC535 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

🎙️ «А где я потом буду работать? Не хочу учиться “в стол”» - где и как может работать конструктор одежды Чтобы посмотреть запись эфира с историями наших выпускников напишите в бот цифру 44 @maimoff_bot Если хотите получить консультацию по программе обучения и условиям участия — напишите в личные сообщения @AcademMody 📌Подписывайтесь: Telegram | Ig | VK | YouTube Обучение | Консультации

🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC551 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вспомнила еще такой фрагмент из фильма. — А не пожалеем ли мы об упущенной возможности из-за бесконечных сомнений? Ведь часто мы сами мешаем исполнению своих желаний

🔥2

22 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC564 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

🎙️«У меня пока нет ясности, чего я хочу и чем я хочу заниматься дальше: ремонтом одежды, индивидуальным пошивом или работой с брендами. А начинать страшно — вдруг пойму, что это не моё, и придётся всё бросить» - Как обрести ясность? - А что, если это не мое? Если хотите получить консультацию по программе обучения и условиям участия — напишите в личные сообщения @AcademMody

🔥41

21 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC528 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кейс выпускницы: от мечты о профессии — к проектам для звёзд Элеонора долго не решалась работать в той сфере, о которой мечтала. Казалось, что интересные проекты и хороший доход — это для кого-то другого. После обучения на нашем курсе всё изменилось. Сейчас Элеонора: — работает в любимой профессии; — получает 150–200 тыс. рублей в месяц; — работает в команде портных и конструкторов над свадебные платья на заказ, в т

🔥15❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @academymody. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@academymody edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

что волнует вас сильнее всего сейчас?

  1. «Бренды закрываются. А работу потом вообще реально найти?»17%
  2. «Мне уже 40/50+. Не поздно ли менять профессию?»25%
  3. «Я умею шить, но не понимаю, хватит ли этого, чтобы стать конструктором».33%
  4. «Не проще ли просто освоить САПР?»8%
  5. «А где вообще работать конструктору, если в моём городе нет крупных фабрик?»17%
  6. «Можно ли работать удалённо и вести несколько брендов?»17%
  7. «Какие навыки сегодня реально ценят работодатели и бренды?»33%
  8. «Боюсь потратить год на обучение, а потом не окупить его».8%
  9. У меня другой вопрос — напишу в комментариях.8%

The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Как настрой на сегодняшний эфир в 18:00?

  1. Уже жду, буду смотреть14%
  2. Планирую, если ничего не сорвётся29%
  3. Гляну в записи57%
  4. Не в этот раз0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

Вы придете на платный практикум?

  1. ✅ Приду, если ничего не помешает0%
  2. 📼 Постараюсь, а нет — досмотрю в записи0%
  3. 🤔 Зависит от темы — заинтригуйте0%
  4. 💡 Жду инсайтов и новых фишек0%
  5. ✂️ Хочу больше практики и разборов0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

Что изменилось после «Системного мышления конструктора»? 🔍

  1. 🤯 Теперь понимаю причину дефектов, а не борюсь со следствием0%
  2. 🧩 Всё выстроилось в систему0%
  3. 🔍 Начала видеть логику там, где раньше был хаос0%
  4. ✂️ Уже разбираю свои изделия по-новому0%
  5. 🔥Мне мало! Хочу еще!0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Как вам мини-курс «Взгляд конструктора»? 🧵

  1. 🤯 Инсайт за инсайтом67%
  2. 📚 Море полезного материала33%
  3. 💡 Сложное стало понятным0%
  4. ✂️ Уже применяю на практике0%
  5. 🔥 Огонь, хочу продолжение!0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

А вы уже прокачали «взгляд конструктора»? 👀

  1. 🎓 Прошла оба — «Взгляд» и «Системное мышление»11%
  2. 👁 Только «Взгляд конструктора»0%
  3. 🧠 Только «Системное мышление конструктора»0%
  4. 📼 Начала, но ещё в процессе11%
  5. 🙋‍♀️ Пока ни один — но очень хочу!78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Швейный дом
@sew_house · 25,205
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия индустрии моды” (@academymody), 14,960 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academymody.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.