7 measurements spanning 21 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 993–1,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 07:53
1,013
+4
24 Aug 2026, 23:37
1,009
+5
21 Aug 2026, 07:02
1,004
+2
17 Aug 2026, 22:23
1,002
+2
15 Aug 2026, 00:04
1,000
+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:34
996
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:59
996
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 1,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
236
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
8 (2 July 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
236
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 56s
Average length
1m 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
64
48.9%
❤
34
26.0%
👍
9
6.87%
👏
8
6.11%
👀
5
3.82%
💯
5
3.82%
custom 5379679518740978720
3
2.29%
😍
3
2.29%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧡Я ничего не принимаю🧡
Так говорят почти все пациенты, и почти всегда это неправда.
📌Исследования показывают: 95% пациентов, принимающих БАДы, не скажут об этом врачу.
Для большинства «это же не лекарство, а просто травки, подруге вот помогло». Это что-то, о чем легко забыть, посчитать неважным или постесняться рассказать.
Даже некоторые специалисты тут большой проблемы не увидят.
🎯Рынок добавок регулируется слабо…
Забыть, недосмотреть – это риск не только для начинающих трихологов, но и для самых опытных, когда диагноз, кажется, можно поставить уже с порога.
Мы рассказывали про один такой коварный пример, когда "с порога" кажется, что на голове диффузная телогеновая алопеция, после опроса – что хроническая форма, а на деле – гнездная, без очагов.
Новая версия TRIHOPROF буквально за несколько щелчков заставила бы вас вниматель…
Мы с вами согласны!
Держать в голове более сотни трихоскопических признаков, а потом верно интерпретировать увиденное – задачка со звёздочкой. До такой степени, что, согласно опросам, проведенным среди сертифицированных дерматологов в США и Европе, 20% отказываются от трихоскопии в ежедневной практике.
Думаем, нашим подписчикам не нужно объяснять, почему это – прямая дорога к ошибочным диагнозам. Вместо этого мы хо…
Что для вас (или ваших коллег) самое сложное в трихоскопии?
Ничего не упустить и удержать в голове все мелкие детали44%
Правильно интерпретировать признаки: их специфичность, выраженность52%
Воспроизводимость8%
Объяснить пациенту свои выводы28%
Сложности с оборудованием и программами20%
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩Новая эра в лечении АГА
На что надеяться пациентам с андрогенетической алопецией? За последние 30 лет трихология не ушла дальше миноксидила и финастерида/дутастерида?
Прямо сейчас на стадии клинических исследований находится целое поколение методов, которые работают принципиально иначе: сегодня посмотрим на некоторые из них.
1️⃣
Умные антиандрогены
✅ Класкотерон (Breezula) – топический блокатор андрогенного реце…
❓Пациент принёс анализ крови на ДГТ. Что вы ему скажете?
На консультацию приходит мужчина с жалобами на залысины, поредение в области макушки. В руках бланк с результатом анализов: он уже сдал кровь на дигидротестостерон (ДГТ), потому что «в интернете написано, что это гормон облысения». Он так ждал, что по уровню ДГТ вы назначите лечение.
А цифры в норме. И пациент растерян: «Если уровень ДГТ в норме, значит АГА у…
Одна очень распространенная ошибка в диагностике АГА78%
Ваш вариант из комментариев💜2%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Анизотрихоз – критерий, от которого зависит многое. Но кто решает, что считать истонченным волосом именно у этого пациента?
Часто слышим историю: перед специалистом трихоскопия. Волосы, на первый взгляд, разнокалиберные. И начинается внутренний диалог:
❓ У пациентки от природы тонкие волосы или это уже миниатюризация?
❓ Считать порогом 30 мкм? 35? А если её здоровый толстый волос – это 55 мкм, а истончённый – 40?
…
🔥14❤7👍5👀1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @academy_tib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что для вас (или ваших коллег) самое сложное в трихоскопии?
Ничего не упустить и удержать в голове все мелкие детали44%
Правильно интерпретировать признаки: их специфичность, выраженность52%
Воспроизводимость8%
Объяснить пациенту свои выводы28%
Сложности с оборудованием и программами20%
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Одна очень распространенная ошибка в диагностике АГА78%
Ваш вариант из комментариев💜2%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия трихологии докторов Ткачева и Баруновой” (@academy_tib), 1,013 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academy_tib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
