18 measurements spanning 19 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,336–12,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 10:43
12,357
-6
2 Sept 2026, 06:53
12,363
-7
1 Sept 2026, 05:37
12,370
-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:44
12,375
-17
30 Aug 2026, 06:13
12,392
-19
29 Aug 2026, 04:15
12,411
-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:13
12,417
+2
27 Aug 2026, 04:12
12,415
-7
26 Aug 2026, 00:41
12,422
-12
24 Aug 2026, 21:27
12,434
-18
23 Aug 2026, 08:14
12,452
-13
21 Aug 2026, 21:48
12,465
-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:04
12,470
-6
19 Aug 2026, 13:22
12,476
-4
18 Aug 2026, 10:33
12,480
-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:52
12,486
-3
16 Aug 2026, 05:35
12,489
-7
14 Aug 2026, 23:31
12,496
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.71%
avg views ÷ 12,357 subscribers
Avg views / post
952
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
22 (9 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
3,809
Reactions total
93
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 22:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
2m 32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
348 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
255
73.3%
👍
31
8.91%
👌
30
8.62%
👏
17
4.89%
🙏
10
2.87%
😁
3
0.862%
🤔
1
0.287%
🥰
1
0.287%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این سؤال رو بارها ازم پرسیده بودید و گفتم این بار بهجای جواب دادن توی دایرکت، بیام توی ویدیو و چهرهبهچهره باهاتون در موردش حرف بزنم🤌🏼♥️
سوال اینکه بعد از جدایی،
دقیقاً قراره با حال بدمون،
خاطراتمون و احساساتی که هنوز نسبت به اون آدم داریم،
چیکار کنیم؟
قراره فراموشش کنیم؟
از ذهنمون پاکش کنیم؟
یا…؟
ویدیو رو ببینید؛
جوابش رو کامل براتون گفتم🌱
@academy_hamnafas
با کسی ازدواج کن که توی هر تصمیمی که میگیره،
نظر تو هم براش مهم باشه!
تکتکِ تصمیمها…
چون در نظر گرفتنِ شریک زندگی،
یکی از عمیقترین شکلهای عشق و احترامه 🤌🏼
شبت بخیر رفیق♥️🌙
چند روز بود تو فکر چیدن یه میز قشنگ برای سالگرد عقدمون بودم 🫠🤌🏼
هرچی سرچ میکردم، میگفتم:
اوه… من که از این مدل شمعدونا ندارم!
اوه… این پایهگل رو هم ندارم!
و خیلی اوههای دیگه 🫠😂
یه جا با خودم گفتم
من نه میخوام برای یه مراسم کوچولو اینهمه وسیله بخرم،
نه فرصتشو دارم که برم دنبال همهی این چیزا!
پس گفتم بیخیال کمالگرایی!
دلو زدم به دریا 🌊
و شروع کردم کابینتها رو گشتن ببینم اصلاً چی دارم که بشه باهاش یه میز قشنگ…
کمالگرایی کارش دقیقاً همینه؛
خیلی وقتا باعث میشه
بهجای اینکه از ساختن یه اتفاق قشنگ لذت ببریم،
هی منتظر باشیم همهچی «کامل» و «درست» باشه.
در صورتی که گاهی فقط باید دلو بزنی به دریا
و با همون چیزایی که داری،
شروع کنی🌊✨
و فکر کنم این دقیقاً همون چیزیه که باید قرار امشبمون بشه رفیق…♥️
اینکه خیلی وقتا ما برای شروع کردن،
برای خوشحال بودن،
برای ساختن یه خاطرهی قشنگ،
حتی برای نزدیکتر شدن به آدمی که دوستش داریم…
هی …
🗞️ مجله آکادمی هم نفس | شماره ۱
موضوع این شماره: چرا از حرف کسی که دوستش داریم ناراحت میشیم؟❤️🩹
تا حالا شده فقط با یک جملهی ساده از طرف مقابلت، احساس کنی دوستت نداره یا تو رو درک نمیکنه؟
گاهی مشکل خودِ حرف نیست…
برداشتیه که ما از اون حرف میکنیم.
توی اولین شماره مجله مون دربارهی حرفهایی صحبت کردیم که گفتنشون سخته، شنیدنشون سختهتره؛
اما میتونن رابطهمون رو عمیقتر و امنتر کنن🌱
امیدواریم از مطالعه این شمار…
«چه خوش است راز گفتن به حریف نکتهسنجی
که سخن نگفته باشی، به سخن رسیده باشد…»
قبول دارم واقعا بیت جذابیه…
ولی جاش تو همون کتاب شعره!
توی دنیای واقعی رابطهها
همین که بعد از کلی حرف زدن،
طرف مقابل بالاخره منظورِ واقعیت رو درست فهمیده باشه،
خودش یه پیروزیه🫠😂🤌🏼
منتظر نباش کسی ذهنت رو بخونه!
رابطه سالم با گفتن ساخته میشه،
نه با حدس زدن.
نذار این حرفهای قشنگِ زرد،
حال خودت و رابطهت رو خراب کنه.
شبت بخیر رفیق♥️🌙
نوشِ جونتون رفقای دیده و ندیدهام♥️🤌🏼
امیدواریم این تست، فرصتی باشه برای اینکه
یه کم عمیقتر به خودتون نگاه کنید،
الگوهای رفتارتون رو بهتر بشناسید
و دلیل بعضی از تصمیمها و واکنشهاتون رو بیشتر بفهمید🌱
یادتون باشه...
همهی ما از هر سه ویژگی این تست، سهمی داریم؛
فرق آدمها فقط توی میزانشه، نه داشتن یا نداشتنش.
شناختن این بخشهای شخصیت،
قرار نیست باعث قضاوت خودمون بشه؛
قراره کمکمون کنه آگاهانهتر زندگی کنیم،
رابطهها…
تا حالا از خودت پرسیدی چرا بعضیها خیلی راحت دیگران رو تحت تأثیر قرار میدن؟ 🤔
چرا بعضیها همیشه دنبال دیده شدنن؟ 🌟
و چرا بعضیها بدون عذاب وجدان تصمیمهایی میگیرن که بقیه نمیگیرن؟ 🧊
پشت رفتارهای ما، بخشهایی از شخصیت وجود داره که کمتر دربارهشون حرف میزنیم؛ اما روی رابطهها، انتخابها و مسیر زندگیمون اثر میذارن. 🧠
روانشناسی این سه بُعد رو با نام Dark Triad میشناسه:
🎭 ماکیاولیسم (نفوذ و کنترل)
🪞 خودشیفتگی …
موافقی قرار امشبمون همین باشه رفیق؟🤌🏼♥️
دفعهی بعد که ذهنت اومد یه فاجعه بسازه،
قبل از اینکه باورش کنی،
یه مکث کوچولو بکن…
از خودت بپرس فکری که میکنی چقدر احتمال میدی درست باشه؟
احتمالات دیگه چیان؟
شاید اون چیزی که ذهنت داره نشون میده،
همه ی واقعیت نباشه🌱
یادتون باشه!
اتفاقات از آنچه در ذهنتان میگذرد، کوچکترند.
@academy_hamnafas
❤12👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @academy_hamnafas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
پادکست هایی که باید گوش بدیم. @avinmovie · 110,092 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محدثه مظاهری سیف | آکادمی همنفس” (@academy_hamnafas), 12,357 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academy_hamnafas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.