پارت دوم کلاس دیروز هم اپلود شد و میتونید مشاهده کنید ،،، پارت دوم شامل گزارش رسیدگی و بررسی پرونده بررسی لایحه دفاعی واقعی
❤2

Channel
@academy_accounting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,948subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001684348201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @academy_accounting |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/academy_accounting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 10,948 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 10,944 | +13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 10,931 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 10,928 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 10,926 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 10,932 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 10,929 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 10,926 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 10,920 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 10,922 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 10,922 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (28 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,883 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 76.0% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 10.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پارت دوم کلاس دیروز هم اپلود شد و میتونید مشاهده کنید ،،، پارت دوم شامل گزارش رسیدگی و بررسی پرونده بررسی لایحه دفاعی واقعی
❤2
●●● لینک مشاهده فیلم کلاس مفاهیم هزینه های قابل قبول مالیاتی : پارت اول مفاهیم : https://aparat.com/v/inx58c5 پارت دوم بررسی گزارش رسیدگی و بررسی لایحه دفاعی: https://aparat.com/v/affn894
❤3
فایل کلاس مرور جامع بر مفاهیم هزینه های قابل قبول مالیاتی ■مباحث بررسی شده: ●تشریح ماده ۱۴۷ ●تحلیل جزء به جزء ماده ۱۴۷ ●شروط شکلی و ماهوی هزینه های قابل قبول ●شروط پذیرش هزینه در سامانه مودیان شروط پذیرش هزینه خارج از سامانه مودیان تهیه وتنظیم : مریم نیکخواه - آرش موسی زاده حقیقی ♡ 〇 ⎙ ⌲ ˡⁱᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢᵃʳᵉ https://t.me/nika_hesab_group https://t.me/academy_accounting
❤9
●●● لینک مشاهده فیلم کلاس مفاهیم هزینه های قابل قبول مالیاتی : https://aparat.com/v/inx58c5
آخرین مهلت ثبت نام در وبینار رایگان مفاهیم هزینه های قابل قبول مالیاتی دوره مناسب چه اشخاصی می باشد❓❓ ●●این دوره برای کسانی نیست که میخواهند فقط صرفا «مواد قانونی» را بدانند؛ بلکه بتوانند یک رسیدگی مالیاتی را بخوانند، ایرادات ممیز را تشخیص دهند و برای هزینههای ردشده، دفاع مؤثر ارائه کنند. موضوعاتی که بررسی میشود❓❓ ●● مفاهیم هزینه ●● ماده ۱۴۷ و ۱۴۸ ●● گزارش رسیدگی ●● نحوه تنظیم لایحه دفاعیه این وبینار یک مسیر عم…
نحوه اصلاح مبلغ پوز در اظهارنامه ارزش افزوده دوره بهار ۱۴۰۵ با توجه به اخطارهای مرتبط با مبلغ کارتخوان (پوز)، مودیان میتوانند صورتحساب تجمیعی هر یک از کارتخوانهای خود را دریافت کرده و از مسیر مربوطه، اطلاعات صحیح را در جدول مربوط به کارتخوانها درج و اصلاح نمایند. لینک مشاهده ویدیو در آپارات : https://aparat.com/v/kwkq66e
❤2
فروش ویژه با ۱۰ درصد تخفیف چاپ جدید و سوم ۱۴۰۵ کتاب تشریح و طبقه بندي جامع حقوق و دستمزد با رویکرد حقوق کار تالیف: بهاره نیکخواه، مریم نیکخواه، آرش موسی زاده حقیقی نوبت چاپ : چاپ سوم (1405) تهیه از طریق لینک زیر: https://www.termehbook.com/product/9786223271632/
♨️♨️ کارگاه آنلاین و رایگان مفاهیم هزینه های قابل قبول به تدریس خانم دکتر مریم نیکخواه دوره مناسب چه اشخاصی می باشد❓❓ ●●این دوره برای کسانی نیست که میخواهند فقط صرفا «مواد قانونی» را بدانند؛ بلکه بتوانند یک رسیدگی مالیاتی را بخوانند، ایرادات ممیز را تشخیص دهند و برای هزینههای ردشده، دفاع مؤثر ارائه کنند. موضوعاتی که بررسی میشود❓❓ ●● مفاهیم هزینه ●● ماده ۱۴۷ و ۱۴۸ ●● گزارش رسیدگی ●● نحوه تنظیم لایحه دفاعیه این وب…
♨️ ساده سازی متن قانون تبصره ۲ - ماده ۱۹ قانون پایانه های فروشگاهی اختیار مودی یا تکلیف ❓ مودیان ((میتوانند)) اظهارنامه مربوط به مالیات عملکرد خود را از طریق سامانه مودیان ارائه کنند. ●● در نتیجه مودی اختیار دارد نه تکلیف. تکلیف سازمان امورمالیاتی ❓ سازمان (( موظف است )) ترتیبی اتخاذ کند که اطلاعات مربوط به خرید و فروش مودی عیناً به اظهارنامه مالیات بر عملکرد وی منتقل شود ●●●در نتیجه : سازمان موظف است که زیرسا…
فایل صوتی شماره 1⃣1⃣ ●●ارسال اظهارنامه عملکرد از طریق کارپوشه سامانه مودیان و آپشن جدید موضوعات بررسی شده در فایل صوتی : آیا ارسال اظهارنامه عملکرد امسال تغییرات دارد ؟؟ تغییرات جدید در چه خصوص خواهد بود ؟؟ 🎙 آرش موسی زاده حقیقی 🟢 کانال آموزشی آکادمی نیکا حساب ⚪️ ♡ 〇 ⎙ ⌲ ˡⁱᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢᵃʳᵉ https://t.me/nika_hesab_group https://t.me/academy_accounting
این ویدیو در خصوص حق بیمه قراردادهای پزشکان در بازرسی از دفاتر قانونی هست تهیه و تنظیم : استاد ولی اله سعیدی
نحوه حسابرسی تامین اجتماعی در قراردادهای پرکیسی با پزشکان
🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @academy_accounting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 50,009 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال آموزشی آکادمی حسابداری” (@academy_accounting), 10,948 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academy_accounting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.