Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REGBOOKS

Channel

REGBOOKS

@abtbooks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,453subscribers

+17,665 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453845073
TypeChannel
Username@abtbooks
DescriptionREGBOOKS nashriyoti tomonidan yaratilgan maxsus abituriyentlar kutubxonasi! Eng yangi nashrdagi, zamonaviy yo‘nalish hamda davr talabiga mos adabiyotlar bilan tanishtirib boramiz! Kitoblar ro‘yxati: 👉 t.me/ABTbooks/1743 @ABTbooks_uz yoki (93)008-27-00
Created18 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/abtbooks

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,33833,05321,695.528,4536 August 202614 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 100 days, net +17,665. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,931–36,460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 16:5728,453-225
11 Nov 2026, 20:2828,678-179
9 Nov 2026, 22:0528,857-136
8 Nov 2026, 13:2128,993-117
7 Nov 2026, 09:1929,110-101
6 Nov 2026, 11:0529,211-128
5 Nov 2026, 12:2829,339-58
4 Nov 2026, 13:0929,397-98
3 Nov 2026, 15:3029,495-95
2 Nov 2026, 12:4729,590-154
1 Nov 2026, 10:0529,744-114
31 Oct 2026, 12:0729,858-142
30 Oct 2026, 08:5630,000-132
29 Oct 2026, 07:0730,132-148
28 Oct 2026, 05:1130,280-146
27 Oct 2026, 07:1530,426-130
26 Oct 2026, 06:2030,556-204
25 Oct 2026, 08:2730,760-163
24 Oct 2026, 09:2730,923-216
23 Oct 2026, 09:0631,139first reading

Engagement

172 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.51%
avg views ÷ 28,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.479%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 172 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held172 (29 July 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total175,847
Reactions total842
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,070
Videos
≈521
Links
≈4,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 03s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,417 reactions across 162 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤80733.4%
🔥60024.8%
😁40816.9%
👍1968.11%
❤‍🔥963.97%
🤩662.73%
👌311.28%
💯230.952%
🌚220.91%
😱200.827%
⚡170.703%
🫡140.579%
🕊130.538%
🏆120.496%
😢120.496%
💘110.455%
💅100.414%
👏80.331%
🥰80.331%
🆒70.29%
9 further kinds361.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 65 posts held from the last 30 days (13.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC517 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Men, Mamadaliyeva Maftuna, 14 yildan buyon ona tili va adabiyot fani bo'yicha repetitorlik faoliyatini olib bormoqdaman. Shu vaqt mobaynida juda ko'p test materiallaridan foydalanib shunga amin bo'ldimki, "Regbooks" nashriyoti tomonidan tayyorlangan har bir kitob sifat jihatdan to'la talabga javob beradi. Davron Akbar ustozimiz tomonidan tuzilgan testlar yordamida 3 yildan buyon o'quvchilarimiz bilan yuqori natijalar…

❤1🐳1👍1

14 Nov 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,010 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🇺🇿 O‘zbekcha fikrlaymiz, inglizcha ifodalaymiz! 🇬🇧 O‘zbek tilidagi mashhur iqtiboslar ingliz tilida qanday jaranglaydi? 🤔 🎬 Videoda tanish iqtiboslarning inglizcha talqinlarini jamladik. Siz qaysi iqtibosning tarjimasini bilardingiz? Izohlarda yozib qoldiring! 👇

🔥3❤1

13 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

📚 MILLIY SERTIFIKATGA TAYYORGARLIKNI TO‘G‘RI MANBADAN BOSHLANG! Ona tili fanidan milliy sertifikat imtihoniga tayyorlanyapsizmi? Unda vaqtingizni tejash va bilimingizni mustahkamlash uchun to‘g‘ri qo‘llanma tanlash muhim! 📖 REGBOOKS nashriyotining ona tili fanidan "Yangi qo‘llanma va testlar" kitobi sizga yangi qo‘llanma va testlar asosida tizimli tayyorlanishda yordam beradi. 🎯 Maqsadingiz sari ishonchli qadam t…

❤2

13 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,370 views14 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

📸 Doskani rasmga olib, o‘zingizni aldamang! ✍️ O‘qituvchi doskaga yozganda darrov telefonni chiqarib rasmga olasizmi? Ha, albatta, buning hammasi hech qachon yozib olinmaydigan “keyin yozib olaman”lar uchun, toʻgʻrimi? Olimlar buni “Raqamli amneziya” deyishadi. Gap shundaki: 🔴Rasmga olganda miya “Ma'lumot telefonda saqlandi, uni eslab qolishga energiya sarflash shart emas” deb o‘zini “o‘chiradi”. 🔴Qo‘lda yozganin…

❤7🔥4❤‍🔥3

12 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC≈1,590 views8 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Yaxshi so’zi “yoqmoq” so’zidan hosil qilinganini bilarmidingiz? “Yaxshi” so’zi bugun “kishiga yoqadigan, maʼqul boʻladigan” ma’nosida qo’llanadi. Ushbu so’zning hosil bo’lishiga “yoqmoq” fe’li sabab bo’lgan. “Yoq” so’zi davrlar o’tishi bilan “yaq” shakliga o’zgargan, yana ancha vaqt o’tib “yax” ko’rinishiga kelgan. Oxir-oqibat hozirga kelib “yaxshi” holatiga aylangan. Sh.Rahmatullayevning “O’zbek tilining etimologi…

👍5❤2🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Milliy sertifikat imtihonidan A+ daraja olish uchun qancha vaqt kerak deb o'ylaysiz? Shu savol sizga berilsa, qancha vaqt degan bo'lardingiz? Javobingizni izohlarda yozing👇 @abtbooks

🔥5❤1

11 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,740 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ НОВИНКА ДЛЯ АБИТУРИЕНТОВ! 📘 «Универсальное пособие » Данная книга предназначена для абитуриентов, которые хотят не просто выучить химию, а глубоко понять её теоретические основы. В книге подробно и последовательно изложены основные темы общей химии, необходимые для успешной подготовки к вступительным экзаменам и дальнейшему обучению в вузе. Особое внимание уделено тем вопросам, которые чаще всего вызывают затру…

👍2🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,100 views8 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Natijalar gapirsin! Men uchun Milliy sertifikat imtihonida ideal mavzulashtirilgan toʻplam... Muallif va nashriyotga rahmat😊 Kitoblarimizning siz uchun foydali manbaga aylanayotgani bizni juda quvontiradi. Bildirilgan ishonch va iliq fikrlar uchun katta rahmat! 😊 Sizning e’tirofingiz — biz uchun yanada sifatli kitoblar tayyorlashga motivatsiya! 📚 @abtbooks

❤6🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,340 views5 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔥BUGUN NASHRDAN CHIQDI! Fizika fanidan milliy sertifikat savollari tipidagi testlardan iborat ilk kitob nashrdan chiqdi. ✅Mazkur kitob nafaqat milliy sertifikat, balki fizika faniga oid har qanday imtihonga tayyorgarlik ko'rish uchun tayyorlandi. ✅Kitobda hayotiy va nazariy savollar mujassamlashgan va bu mustaqil fikrlashni yuqori darajada shakllantiradi. 📘Kitobdan namuna ko'rish Bizga murojaat qilish uchun: 📞+9…

👍4🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 02:14 UTC≈2,270 views12 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Kun tarixi! 1933-yil 9-noyabrda Ivan Bunin adabiyot bo'yicha Nobel mukofotini olgan birinchi rus yozuvchisi bo'lganini bilgan. Xushxabar uni Fransiyaning Grass shahridagi kinoteatrda, film ko'rib o'tirgan paytida topib kelgan. Bunin o'sha paytda muhojir edi va mukofot pulining katta qismini muhtoj yozuvchi do'stlariga ulashgan. Savol: Agar siz katta mukofot olsangiz, uni nimaga sarflardingiz? @abtbooks

🤩5❤4❤‍🔥2👍1

8 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈2,630 views11 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔴 Kitobni to‘liq yodlash — ahmoqlikmi? “80/20 qonuni” haqida haqiqat ⚖️ 🔴Ko‘pchilik abituriyentlar “agar men darslikdagi hamma narsani nuqta-verguligacha yodlasam, grantga kiraman” deb o‘ylaydi. Natijada ular butun boshli oylarini keraksiz ma’lumotlarni yodlashga sarflashadi. ❌Biroq bu — noto‘g‘ri strategiya. 🔊 Bunday vaziyatlarda esa sizga italiyalik iqtisodchi Vilfredo Pareto kashf etgan “80/20 qonuni” yordamga …

❤7👍2💯2

7 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,400 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Ona tili va adabiyot fanidan Milliy sertfikat A+ kitobimizga ustozlarning bildirgan iliq fikrlari. Mehnatimiz o‘z samarasini berayotganini eshitish biz uchun eng katta quvonch! Barcha o‘quvchilarga kelgusi imtihonlarda ham ulkan muvaffaqiyatlar tilaymiz! Ishonchingiz va qo‘llab-quvvatlaganingiz uchun katta rahmat! 😊

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @abtbooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@abtbooks edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @abtbooks as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz594 voters

Despite ___ very tired, she continued working until midnight.

  1. be20%
  2. being29%
  3. was29%
  4. been22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz621 voters

Had I known about the meeting, I ___ it.

  1. would attend23%
  2. will have attended21%
  3. would have attended34%
  4. had attended22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz592 voters

You ___ have told me the truth. Now it is too late.

  1. should38%
  2. may15%
  3. can27%
  4. would21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz611 voters

Hardly ___ the room when everybody started laughing.

  1. I had entered30%
  2. had I entered25%
  3. did I entered18%
  4. I entered28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz617 voters

It is essential that every student ___ present at the meeting.

  1. is28%
  2. was22%
  3. be19%
  4. will be31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz613 voters

If he had studied harder, he ___ the examination.

  1. would pass24%
  2. will have passed25%
  3. would have passed32%
  4. had passed19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Muhammad Haydarov
@ona_tili_Haydarov · 41,327
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Samarqand til maktabi
@stm_uz · 17,888
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
MILLIY SERTIFIKAT [Ona tili va adabiyot]
@onatilitestlar · 32,707
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Dilafro'z Fayzullayevna | Habel | Ona tili
@habelonatili · 42,094
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
O'ZBEK TILI VA ADABIYOTI. MILLIY SERTIFIKAT
@Ona_tili_va_adabiyot_BMBA · 22,184
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
O'zbek tili va adabiyoti (Davron Akbar bilan)
@RenessansStudy · 48,635
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥 | JALOL BOLTAYEV
@TESTLIDER · 23,180
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Samgin Qurbonov
@samgin_qurbonov · 62,580
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REGBOOKS” (@abtbooks), 28,453 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abtbooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.