Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nar

@abovyan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,660subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857834483
TypeChannel
Username@abovyan
Created21 October 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/abovyan

Growth

3,6603,6703,6657 August 2026 — 3,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,670 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,668 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,660 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,659–3,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:473,660-8
8 Aug 2026, 12:063,668-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:333,670no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:253,670first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 21 October 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 7 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11638.8%
🔥4615.4%
4113.7%
😁175.69%
🤡113.68%
🤨103.34%
🤔93.01%
💩82.68%
👀72.34%
💯62.01%
👏51.67%
💅41.34%
🖕41.34%
🤣41.34%
🤮41.34%
🥰41.34%
10.334%
🍌10.334%
🤷‍♀10.334%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2022 to 20 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Nov 2024, 20:58 UTC≈7,900 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всех же бесит, когда айфон разрядился в ноль и нужно подождать какое-то время перед тем как он немного подзарядится и сможет включиться? На андроидах раньше такого не было (кстати напишите в комментах есть ли такое сейчас). Нашел тут забавную деталь в исходниках iBoot. iBoot - это загрузчик айфонов и первый софт, который исполняется при его включении, соответственно именно он отвечает в том числе за питание. С неко

👍2510🔥6🤡6🖕4🍌1

14 Nov 2024, 10:35 UTC≈6,170 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Новое приложение Билайна очень странное Помимо совершенно неуместных анимаций в нем вас ждут: Совершенно сломанный UX, противоречащий традициям платформы. Странно отрисованный UI: от неверно подобранных разрешений для графики, от чего некоторые вещи выглядят мыльно вплоть до интерфейсов, где визуально невозможно определить что является контролом, а что информационным элементом. Проблемы с производительностью при

🤨10👀6💯31👍1😁1

Signed Narek Abovyan

12 Nov 2024, 22:13 UTC≈5,480 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Боевой интерфейс Уже несколько лет использую Google Meet как один из основных инструментов для работы. Могу выделить два основных сценария, как я обычно попадаю в митинг: - по прямой ссылке из календаря/чата - создаю звонок ad hoc Первый случай прост: кликнул по ссылке и подключился. Единственный момент, который вызывает неудобство, — это необходимость иногда переключать аккаунт, с которого захожу. Часто нужно быс

👍9🔥31

27 Mar 2024, 22:50 UTC≈21,200 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shardify_ruVideo

Превращаем НФТ в жетоны с Shardify Мы запускаем новый сервис, который позволяет разделить NFT на части и приобрести небольшую долю любой NFT. Для теста мы запускаем это на примере ваучера Notcoin Pre-Market. Небольшая инструкция по работе сервиса 1. На сайте shardify.app выбираем коллекцию Notcoin Pre-Market 2. Добавляем NFT в хранилище коллекции 3. В результате NFT будет сохранена на смарт-контракте, а вы получит

👍34🔥259💩8👏5🤣4🤮4🤡3

21 Feb 2024, 17:20 UTC≈30,300 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разбор ton-20 с технической стороны Хочу раскрыть тему инскрипшенов в TON: что это такое, зачем они нужны (и нужны ли) и полезны ли они экосистеме. Инскрипшены изначально появились в Bitcoin как попытка реализовать функционал стандарта ERC-20 в Bitcoin. ERC-20 – это стандарт монеток из Ethereum. Его суть довольно проста: контракт хранит данные о количестве монет у пользователя и позволяет пользователям отправлять

👍4320🔥12🤔6💯3🤡21

18 Feb 2024, 17:12 UTC≈18,400 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁13💅4🤔3🤷‍♀1🥰1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @abovyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nar” (@abovyan), 3,660 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abovyan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.