Channel
@aboutmarketinglife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002475140421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aboutmarketinglife |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aboutmarketinglife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 97 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 98 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 98 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 52.6% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 28.4% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 15 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aboutmarketinglife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 November 2025 to 15 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В 2025 стратегии больше напоминают скетчбук, а не каменный монолит. На прошлой неделе на защите маркетинговых стратегий в ВШЭ, через одного звучало: «стратегия актуальна на текущий момент, но что будет в 2026 — никто не знает». Это признание, что внешние факторы меняются настолько быстро, что честно строить линейный план на 3–5 лет уже почти невозможно в digital, финтехе и e‑commerce, но как оказалось и в В2В тоже.…
🔥4
В этот чудесный воскресный день добавим еще немного лайфа в этот канал. Из последних событий: защита диплома на курсе «Стратегического маркетинга» в ВШЭ в Питере🥳🎉 Только втянулась в учебу и все закончилось. Посоветуйте мне еще курсы, которые стоят того, чтобы вместить их в свою жизнь 😅
❤8
Кстати, на тему маркетплейсов: недавно читала пост моего преподавателя Алексея Игнатьева, о ситуации с банками и внутренними платежными инструментами маркетплейсов. Рекомендую к прочтению https://t.me/ignatev_says/659
🔥5❤2
Маркетплейсы против блогеров: кто реально влияет на продажи? Раньше центром силы были полка и реклама: кто громче крикнул — того и взяли. Теперь главное — алгоритм. Он решает, что мы увидим и в какой момент.😬 Маркетплейсы становятся медиаплатформами: свои рекламные инструменты, лента рекомендаций, промо, море данных о поведении пользователей. Платформа смотрит не на одну покупку, а на весь путь человека: заказы, …
❤3💯1
Последние месяцы писала диплом, полностью погрузившись в исследования рынка инфлюенс-маркетинга. И вот какие ключевые тренды я вынесла из этого анализа: 🔸 Инхаус вместо агентств. Бренды хотят lovemark, а это уже не про: ты нам рекламу, а мы тебе деньги. А про долгосрочное партнерство и выстраивание взаимоотношений с блогерами. 🔸 Автоматизация и white-label на стороне клиентов. Они хотят видеть всю воронку, анализи…
❤3🔥2
Утро начинается с предзащиты диплома на курсе Стратегического маркетинга. Пожелайте удачи 🤞
🔥10🙏7👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥4🔥2
Еще картинки с Блогемы. Было иначе, чем в прошлом году, но уже совсем «по взрослому». #блогема
❤14💯1
Бежала на сцену, чтобы вручить премию в номинации «Лидер продаж в прямом эфире» на Блогеме @blogema_awards Юля Анурина @skidki_v_nnovv💫 мои поздравления
❤12🔥2😱2
Завершили мы командировку в Алматы — Бизнес-завтраком для клиентов. И это событие стало для меня главным инсайтом о местном рынке. Изначально скромно планировали собрать человек 50. Но как только начали рассылать приглашения, список стал стремительно расти, еле остановились на 120 приглашенных! 😁 Если бы это было в Москве, пришло бы процентов 60-70. Но Казахстан — это другой мир. Там комьюнити невероятно открытое,…
❤8🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @aboutmarketinglife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШМаркетинг” (@aboutmarketinglife), 97 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aboutmarketinglife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.