IMPORTANT NOTICE GUYS!! @XD_IS_BACK IS NOT MY ACCOUNT ❌❌ SO BE SURE BEFORE DEALING MY ID IS - @SEDLYFHD ONLY!! SO DEAL AT YOUR OWN RISK 📛

Channel
ABOUT SARIK
@about_sarik_XD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001258126615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @about_sarik_XD |
| Created | 17 December 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/about_sarik_XD |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 3 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
😘ME IZ CO-OWNER OF 🥳 ▫️ @THEWIZARDNETWORK 💥 ▫️ @LEGENDS_UNION 🔥 NO MORE 😢 OWNER KIDS REMOVED ME AFTER DELETING OLD ACCOUNT
🥳 YOUR BRO HAS SUCESSFULLY GOT VERIFICATION IN 24 VERIFICATION CHANNELS 😱❤️ 🥰THANKS FOR LOVE ND SUPPORT 🤩😘 #hatersfuckoff
Aur kitna hou bhai log🙄😅
ʜɪᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴜᴛᴛᴏɴ ɪꜱ yᴏᴜ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴍᴇ 🤗
ɴᴏᴡ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴠᴇʀɪꜰɪᴇᴅ ꜱᴏ ɪ ᴀᴍ ᴠᴇʀɪꜰɪᴇᴅ ɪɴ - 1) @gverified 2) @VERIFIED_USERS 3) @bnfverified 4) @G_VERIFIED 5) @Avengers_network // @avengersverified (same network!) 6) @LmaoVerifieds 7) @BBVERIFIED 8) @verified_club 9) @certifieduser 10) @Verifie_d 11) @xlr8verfied 12) slot got empty 13) @UNKNOWNS_VERIFIED 14) @edithverified 15) @venoms_verified 16) @XD_VERIFIEDS 17) @SHIELDVERIFIED 18) @coolverified …
KOI NA APNA SAB BSDK
ʜᴇʟʟᴏ ɢᴜyꜱ ɪ ᴀᴍ @sarik_XD ʜᴇʀᴇ ɪ ᴀᴍ ᴜᴩʟᴏᴀᴅɪɴɢ ᴀʟʟ ᴍy ɪɴꜰᴏ ( ɴᴏᴛ ᴩᴇʀꜱᴏɴᴀʟ ɪɴꜰᴏ)
ꜱᴏ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ɢʀᴏᴜᴩꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ ɪ ᴀᴍ ᴀᴅᴍɪɴ ɪɴ..(ᴍᴇ ɪᴢ ɴᴏᴏʙ ꜱɪʀ) 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
--------------------------------------------------------------
ɴᴏᴡ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴛɪᴇꜱ ɪ ʙᴇʟᴏɴɢ / ᴛᴀɢꜱ 1) ★𝘙𝘈𝘐𝘋𝘌𝘙★ 2)「✯𝐏𝐑𝐎 𝔾𝔼ℕ𝔾✯」 3) ∇IҜIΠG 4) ⚔️฿Ⱡ₳₵₭ ₦ł₦J₳ ₣ØⱤ₵Ɇ⚔️ 5) #FяєακAямγ 6) 🎭 ρяιи¢Ɇ αяму🎭 7) ᘜꫀꪀꫀ𝘴i𝘴 ᘜꪖꪀᧁ 8) 〚𝖂𝔚 𝖇𝖎𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖗𝖘™】𝓛 -3 9) [★TH★] 10) #𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐘™ 11) #є∂ιтн ( verification tag) 12) (☫🇮🇳☭) 13)『तेरा बाप』 14) 𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐌'𝐒 𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐅𝐈𝐄𝐃 15) [𝙇𝙈𝘼𝙊] 16) #ᴛʀᴀɴꜱᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴏɴ 17) #Mα×є∂Aяму 18) ★𝘎𝘍𝘟𝘊★ 19) 『✪₮₳✪』 20) 🛡 SHIELD VERIFIED 🛡 21) ₮ⱧɆ Ʉ₦₭₦Ø₩₦₴ 22) [ x͢͢͢ᗡ ] Verified 23) 【★𝘽𝙂★】 24) 『तेरा जीज…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @about_sarik_XD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 917,365 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BBVERIFIED · 471 postƈօօʟ ʋҽɾιϝιҽԃ « 『€Ꮙ™』»
@coolverified · 311 postRESERVED
@DarkwebInjectorSrk · 51 postG VERIFIED
@G_VERIFIED · 381 post𝗚 - 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗘𝗗
@gverified · 1431 postHacker Spoilt™ 𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐅𝐈𝐄𝐃
@HackerSpoilt_Verification · 401 postSPAT Verifieds
@SPATverifieds · 401 post𝙶𝙻𝙰𝙳'𝚂 𝚅𝙴𝚁𝙸𝙵𝙸𝙴𝙳𝚂🔥
@SUPERFIEDS · 621 post𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗭𝗔𝗥𝗗 𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞™ ~ #ᴛʜᴇᴡɪᴢᴀʀᴅɴᴇᴛᴡᴏʀᴋ
@TheWizardNetwork · 1681 postUNKNOWNS VERIFIED
@UNKNOWNS_VERIFIED · 11 postمحافظ
@VERIFIED_USERS · 11 postXLR8 VERIFIEDS
@xlr8verfied · 101 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 16
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 16
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@about_sarik_XD named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ABOUT SARIK” (@about_sarik_XD), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/about_sarik_XD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.