Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A Book About

Channel

A Book About

@abookabout

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,890subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906548645
TypeChannel
Username@abookabout
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/abookabout

Growth

1,89013 Aug 2026, 02:02 — 1,890 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:26 — 1,890 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 02:0213 Aug 2026, 06:26
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,888–1,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:261,890no change
13 Aug 2026, 02:021,890first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 1,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
501
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,513
Reactions total399
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

638 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40363.2%
🔥13320.8%
❤‍🔥243.76%
👀172.66%
🥰162.51%
🎉81.25%
👍81.25%
🤝81.25%
😱71.10%
👏30.47%
🤩20.313%
10.157%
10.157%
🌚10.157%
🌭10.157%
💔10.157%
😁10.157%
🙏10.157%
🤡10.157%
🥱10.157%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC218 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Нове відео на ютубі👀

15🔥6❤‍🔥2👀2

10 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC294 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Дочитав другу книгу! Сюжет - шикарний! Суржик - шикарний! Гумор - шикарний! Це навіть краще за першу частину! Нарікаю книгу найкращою за цей рік!

26🔥91👏1

9 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC342 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Книга про чоловіка, який втік з табору Північної Кореї. Це щось схоже на ГУЛАГ, де люди - це просто робоча сила, яка має тяжко працювати допоки не помре. Дожити до 50 років в таких умовах вже вважається довголіттям. За будь який непослух - смерть. Історія вражає жорстокістю системи та людей, що там працюють. А також тим, як деяких увʼязнених від народження привчають до доносів, жорстокості та слухняності. Там ще є

25👍5🌚1👀1💔1

8 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC353 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Текст цікавий насамперед як зріз епохи України нульових. А ще для тих, кому подобається читати про трохи шалені пригоди молодих людей. Історія про пошук свободи та свого місяця в житті, але, читаючи зараз, проблеми персонажів та їх погляди на життя здаються дещо наївними. Мені особисто чогось не вистачило, тому субʼєктивно текст на 3.5/5. Та не шкодую, що прочитав книгу, вона варта того, щоб зайняти своє місце в су

16🔥5🤝2👀1

2 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC536 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Книга трохи слабка, як для Кінга Я б навіть сказав - вторинна, навіть у доробку самого автора Але це все ще цікава історія👀 3.5/5 для мене

16👀5❤‍🔥3🤝2

29 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC737 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

«Шахмати для дибілів» - шикарний текст! Дуже раджу! Це 5/5, це любов, це найкраща книга року! Тут насправді 2 книги під однією обкладинкою. Друга називається «Хрустальна свиноферма» і це пряме продовження першої, її я ще не почав, але найближчим часом планую🤝🏼

🔥2813❤‍🔥8👀1

23 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC635 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Можливо вам треба щось слухати на фоні, поки працюєте😄 Нагадую про своє останнє відео, бо там якась біда з переглядами🥲 Буду вдячний за перегляд, лайк і коментар🫶🏼

29🔥5👀3🌭1🤝1🤡1😁1

22 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC615 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Прочитав 4 і 5 книги з циклу «Щоденники Вбивцебота». Якщо коротко, на пʼятій книзі я і зупинюсь, далі не продовжуватиму. Перша частина була для мене в саме серденько, але кожна наступна була спробою повторити одне й те ж. Детальніше буде у новому відео на ютубі (сподіваюсь, скоро)👀

21👀2👍1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC594 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Тепер маю ці скарби😱 (подарували на день народження)

33🔥14😱6❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC579 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026

А ще він методично критикує Трампа та його політику у своїх книгах. Це завжди сказано ненароком, десь в контексті якогось діалогу, але це наочно демонструє адекватну позицію автора. Корочє, Кінг то любов🫶🏼

32🤝3🔥2❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC610 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Обожнюю Стівена Кінга за те, що він, на відміну від більшості вестернів, не має ілюзій щодо росії, не романтизує болота, а бачить їх істинну сутність і завжди транслює це у своїх текстах.

36🔥7👍2👏1

16 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC706 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Загадав, щоб Федоров залишився МО🤝🏼 Усім удачі сьогодні на мітингу Я хворію і «святкую» день народження, але подумки з вами🫂

🔥3020🎉8🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @abookabout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,392,905 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A Book About” (@abookabout), 1,890 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abookabout.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.