قال ابن عدي: كان ابن صاعد إذا ذكرَ البخاريَّ يقول: الكبشُ النطّاح!. [من روى عنهم البخاري في الصحيح: (ص٥٤)]
👍2

Channel
@aboobaida_alMakki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,719subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001018472857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aboobaida_alMakki |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aboobaida_alMakki |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 1,719 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 1,723 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 1,718 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 1,723 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 1,725 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 1,723 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 1,722 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,725 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,728 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 1,727 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 1,729 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 1,729 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
61 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال ابن عدي: كان ابن صاعد إذا ذكرَ البخاريَّ يقول: الكبشُ النطّاح!. [من روى عنهم البخاري في الصحيح: (ص٥٤)]
👍2
كلمة توجيهية ٢٢.جمادى الأولى.١٤٣٤هـ لشيخنا العلامة المحدث ربيع بن هادي المدخلي رحمه الله.
👍1
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
[ معنى قول النبي ﷺ: وذلك أضعف الإيمان] - قال النبي: (مَن رأى منكم منكرًا فليغيره بيده فإن لم يَستطع فبلسانه فإن لم يَستطع فبقلبه وذلك أضعف الإيمان)، وفي الحديث الآخر: (ليس وراء ذلك من الإيمان مثقال حبة خردل). - قال شيخ الإسلام رحمه الله: فإن مرادَه أنه لم يَبق بعدَ هذا الإنكار مَا يَدخُل في الإيمان حتى يَفعله المؤمن؛ بل الإنكار بالقَلب آخر حُدود الإيمان، ليس مراده أن مَنْ لَمْ يُنكر ذلك لم يَكن مَعه من الإيمان حبة…
👍1
تقديم_شيخ_الإسلام_المختارة_للمقدسي_على_مستدرك_الحاكم (3).pdf
إنَّ السمعَ والطاعة في المعروف لولاة الأمرِ أصلٌ شرعيٌّ تعبُّدي، غيرُ معلَّقٍ بتحقّق المصالح الدنيويَّة للمكلفين؛ فليس الأمرُ دائرًا مع العطاء والمنع وُجودًا وعَدمًا. بل المسلمُ مأمورٌ شرعًا بالسمع والطاعة في المعروف، سَوَاءٌ نالَ من الدُّنيا حَظًّا من مال أو منصبٍ، أم حُرِم؛ ولأجل هذا لم يربطِ النبيُّ ﷺ طاعةَ الولاة بالمكاسب الماديَّة. بل قال ﷺ: (اسْمَعُوا وأطِيعُوا وإنِ اسْتُعْمِلَ علَيْكُمْ عَبْدٌ حَبَشِيٌّ كَأَن…
👍1
اعلم رحمني الله وإياك: أن العلم ميراثُ الأنبياء، لا يكون حامله مُعتَبرًا إلا إذا جمع بين الفقه الصحيح، والفَهم الحَسن، وصدق الديانة، وسلامة المنهج، أما الجرأة على الكلام في دين الله بغير علم ولا برهان؛ فقد كانت سببًا في إضلال الخلق، وإثارة الشبهات، وتشويش الحقائق، وما دخل الخللُ على الأمم إلا يوم رُفع شأن الأدعياء، وزُهد في العلماء! .
👍6
اعلم رحمني الله وإياك أن حقيقة التجرّد للحقِّ؛ تحقيقٌ للإخلاص لله بالعبودية، ولرسوله ﷺ بالمُتابعة، وانقياد للدليل الشرعي من الكتاب والسنة؛ بحيث يَدورُ العبدُ الباحث للحق مع الوحيين حَيثُ دارَا لا مع غيرهما، فلا يُقدِّم بين يدي الله ورسولِه هوى النفس، ولا تقليدَ الرجال والتعصب لهم، ولا لمذاهبهم. ويَزداد هذا تأكيدا في موطنين: - الموطن الأول: في خاصَّة نفسك؛ وذلك بانقياد القلبِ وتسليمه لنصوص الوحيين، والمسارعة إلى ال…
👍3
السلفي الصادقُ في تديّنه؛ لا يجعل منهجَ السلفِ شعارات نظريّة لِلتَّمَدُّح، وكسب الجماهير، وطلب الجاه، واستعطاف الناس، بل هو عَزِيمَةُ نَفسٍ تُقدِّمُ الدليلَ، ولو كان في ذلك اعتراف بالخطأ أمام الناس، وذهاب للجاه، وسُقُوط للمكانة ونزولها عند مَنْ يُعظِّمُها؛ فإن هذا هو (حقيقة المنهج السلفي!).
👍4
تقبل الله منا ومنكم وعيدكم مبارك
👍7
قال الفضيل بن عياض -رحمه الله-: من عرفَ الناس استَراح . قال شيخ الإسلام: يُريد -والله أعلم- أنهم لا يَنفعون ولا يَضرّون. [مجموع الفتاوى: (٩٣/١)]
👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aboobaida_alMakki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الفَوَائِدُ المُنتَقَاةُ مِن الكُتُبِ العِلمِيَّةِ والدرُوسِ والمُحَاضَرَاتِ واللِّقَاءَاتِ السلفيَّة” (@aboobaida_alMakki), 1,719 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aboobaida_alMakki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.