The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
احرار نابلس
@abnelbalad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,661subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001626725916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abnelbalad |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abnelbalad |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 3,661 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 3,666 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 3,669 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:27 | 3,687 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 3,693 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 3,700 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 3,706 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 3,723 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 3,724 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 63.2% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 26.3% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
من موقع العملية الاستشهادية على حاجز تياسير شرق طوباس
❤12👍8🫡3
حصيلة عملية الكوماندوز في حاجز تياسير قرب طوباس : قتيلين احدهم قائد فرقة 8 مصابين 3 منهم اصاباتهم خطيرة
❤2
عاجل || جيش الاحتلال يعترف رسميا بمقتل جنديين في عملية إطلاق النار صباح اليوم قرب طوباس.
❤1
عاجل || الجندي "عوفير يونغ" الذي أعلن الاحتلال مقتله رفقة جندي آخر في عملية إطلاق النار والاشتباك المسلح الذي وقع قرب طوباس صباح اليوم.
❤2👍2🔥1
عاجل| مصادر محلية: مقاومون يطلقون النار تجاه قوة راجلة من جيش الاحتلال في بلدة طمون جنوب طوباس.
استطلاع على ارتفاع منخفض في سماء مدينة نابلس
زنانة فوق المنطقة الشرقية ..
هناك صدمة في اوساط قيادات جيش الاحتلال بكيفية وصول منفذ عملية تياسير الى هدفه وسط حصار الاحتلال لطوباس والفارعة وطمون
لا يوجد اي خبر رسمي عن هوية المنفذ و ما هو متداول غير دقيق يرجو التأني وعدم تداول اي اسم رحمه الله واسكنه فسيح جناته 💔
عاجل || إذاعة جيش الاحتلال : منفذ عملية تياسير كان يملك معلومات استخبارية دقيقة بشأن الموقع وتحركات الجنود وأماكنهم
💠 القناة 13 العبرية: لم يتم استخدام مسيّرة في استهداف منفذ عملية تياسير لوجوده على بعد متر إلى مترين من الجنود
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @abnelbalad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Shelat_Jadidah · 69,452
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
@PsycGuide · 32,763
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“احرار نابلس” (@abnelbalad), 3,661 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abnelbalad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.