4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,483–7,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:46
7,487
-16
9 Aug 2026, 14:12
7,503
-4
6 Aug 2026, 17:00
7,507
-6
6 Aug 2026, 05:52
7,513
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 7,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.983%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
62 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
104,360
Reactions total
1,026
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
718 reactions across 51 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
528
73.5%
custom 5341383000464593930
61
8.50%
😢
36
5.01%
🔥
35
4.87%
👍
19
2.65%
💔
14
1.95%
❤🔥
13
1.81%
custom 5341579400729105825
5
0.696%
🎉
4
0.557%
⚡
1
0.139%
👌
1
0.139%
😱
1
0.139%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,026reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мнения тренеров перед финалом
Новый виток в истории женского футбола, домашний финал и экс-коллеги, трансферы и подготовка – все это в специальном сюжете, посвященном финалу 🏆 FONBET-Женский Кубок Беларуси» в Могилеве!
🔥 https://youtu.be/1rNiX7hcUEM
#ФЖК
🇧🇾 Девичья сборная Беларуси WU-15 уступила россиянкам в первом матче Турнира развития УЕФА
Единственный мяч забила Балабанова в компенсированное время.
🔜 Следующий матч девочки проведут 14 августа. В соперницах — Казахстан WU-15 🇰🇿
#СборнаяБеларуси #WU15
🇧🇾 Стартовый состав сборной Беларуси WU-15 на первый матч Турнира развития УЕФА:
В соперниках у команды Татьяны Киосе — сверстницы из России. Начинаем в 14:30. ⚔️
Прямая трансляция — здесь. Максимальная поддержка девчатам!
#СборнаяБеларуси #WU15
👧🏼🇧🇾 Девичья сборная Беларуси WU-15 стартует на Турнире развития УЕФА в Казахстане
В 14:30 (матч перенесен) наши девчата поборются со сверстницами из России. Удачи команде Татьяны Киосе!
📹 Прямая трансляция встречи будет доступна на ютуб-канале КФФ.
#СборнаяБеларуси #WU15
ЮРИЮ МАРТЫНОВУ - 80!
Сегодня в Доме футбола прошло торжественное чествование ветерана футбола Юрия Михайловича Мартынова - ему исполнилось 80 лет.
В свое время Юрий Михайлович входил в состав юношеских сборных СССР и БССР, являлся серебряным призером первенства СССР «Кубок Юности» в 1964 году, чемпионом БССР 1966, 1969, 1976 годов, обладателем Кубка БССР 1968, 1976 годов. В качестве футболиста выступал за «Динамо-М…
⚽️«Минск» узнал соперника в женском Кубке Европы УЕФА 🎱
Жеребьевка прошла сегодня в штаб-квартире УЕФА в Ньоне.
Представительницы 🤩FONBET-Женской лиги сыграют против хорватского «Аграма». Отметим, первый отборочный раунд будет состоять из двух матчей — дома и на выезде. Первая игра пройдет 26 августа, ответный поединок состоится 2 сентября.
#wfbelarus #ФЖЛ
🔝Анастасия Соколова — лучший игрок 13 тура 🤩FONBET-Женской лиги!
Полузащитница ⚽️«Нафтана» ярко проявила себя в игре против ⚽️«Витебска», оформив дубль в ворота «северянок». Ее голы помогли новополочанкам уверенно победить, взяв важные три очка.
Поздравляем со званием MVP Анастасию! ❤️ — героине тура!
#wfbelarus #ФЖЛ
Лучший гол 13 тура 🤩FONBET-Женской лиги оформила Софья Немцева!🔝
Форвард ⚽️«Нафтана» сделала классный сольный проход и, пройдя защиту ⚽️«Витебска», зафиналила действие точным дальним ударом в ворота.
🦸🏻♀️ Супергол от супер-Сони! Дальше — больше!
#wfbelarus #ФЖЛ
АБФФ В ЕВРОКУБКАХ
Каждая еврокубковая неделя приносит нам новые назначения – на этот раз их три.
Александр Алейник отработает квалификационный матч Лиги чемпионов, в котором встретятся «Кайрат» и «Левски», в качестве делегата УЕФА. В том же качестве будет работать на матче квалификации Лиги Европы Светлана Гринкевич – ей досталась встреча турецкого «Бешикташа» и чешского «Градец Кралове». В этом же турнире на матче…
🎯 В бомбардирской гонке — без изменений: Дарья Стежко и Блессинг Окпе из ⚽️«Днепра» возглавляют рейтинг
Уже который тур подряд «львицы» делят первую строчку чарта лучших голеадоров 🤩FONBET-Женской лиги.
#wfbelarus #ФЖЛ
🔝Рейтинг ассистентов после 13 туров 🤩FONBET-Женской лиги
На первой строчке Алина Черленок из ⚽️«Динамо-БГУФК»: полузащитница отдала 12 результативных пасов.
Ближайший преследователь — Валерия Белая из ⚽️«Минска»: у нее десять голевых передач.
#wfbelarus #ФЖЛ
Турнирная таблица 1⃣ «MAXLINE-Первая лига» после 19-го тура.
#ПерваяЛига #ЛюбиСвойФутбол
❤11custom 53413830004645939305
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @abffby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,255 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АБФФ” (@abffby), 7,487 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abffby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.