Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net +6,592. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,823–28,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 17:17
23,462
-26
6 Nov 2026, 15:50
23,488
-39
5 Nov 2026, 13:48
23,527
-49
4 Nov 2026, 14:34
23,576
-28
3 Nov 2026, 13:16
23,604
-48
2 Nov 2026, 09:39
23,652
-40
1 Nov 2026, 12:37
23,692
-31
31 Oct 2026, 12:56
23,723
-29
30 Oct 2026, 14:20
23,752
-33
29 Oct 2026, 12:59
23,785
-45
28 Oct 2026, 11:29
23,830
-29
27 Oct 2026, 13:16
23,859
-79
26 Oct 2026, 10:29
23,938
-40
25 Oct 2026, 08:26
23,978
-74
24 Oct 2026, 10:26
24,052
-59
23 Oct 2026, 10:36
24,111
-82
22 Oct 2026, 11:37
24,193
-87
21 Oct 2026, 06:59
24,280
+30
20 Oct 2026, 04:30
24,250
-87
19 Oct 2026, 07:29
24,337
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.11%
avg views ÷ 23,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.795%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
96 (20 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
95,120
Reactions total
573
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 01:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
519
Videos
106
Links
224
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 19s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,797 reactions across 74 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
936
52.1%
🔥
861
47.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 94 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abdusamadtravel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ищу в Казахстане человека, который сможет с нуля запустить и развивать туристическое агентство.
Не просто менеджера, а будущего руководителя проекта.
С моей стороны — более 14 лет опыта в туризме, действующее турагентство в России, практическое понимание всех процессов, поддержка и уже зарегистрированная компания в Казахстане.
Нужен человек, который сможет собрать команду, выстроить продажи и взять на себя развити…
🚢 Из Москвы в Баку планируют запустить круизный лайнер класса люкс.
Маршрут пройдёт по Москве-реке, Оке, Волге и Каспийскому морю.
Путешествие в одну сторону займёт около 7 дней, туда-обратно — 14 дней.
Один лайнер уже готов, ещё два на подходе. Когда запустят первые рейсы и сколько будут стоить билеты, пока неизвестно.
Хотели бы отправиться в такой круиз? 🚢
🇺🇸 Регистрацию на Green Card снова отложили.
29 октября апелляционный суд США приостановил решение, по которому регистрацию на лотерею DV-2027 должны были открыть до 1 ноября.
Теперь Госдеп США не обязан открывать регистрацию в эти сроки.
Саму лотерею не отменили, но когда начнётся приём заявок, пока неизвестно.
Будем следить за новостями и сообщать об изменениях.
Перешлите друзьям, которые тоже ждут открытия ре…
🇬🇪 Есть среди подписчиков те, кто ездил в Грузию на автомобиле с кыргызскими номерами?
Поделитесь опытом в комментариях. Были ли сложности при пересечении границы и какие документы требовали?
Где лучше отдохнуть мусульманской семье?
Ответили на этот вопрос в видео, снятом у нас в офисе.
Если у вас остались вопросы, задавайте их в комментариях 👇
🇹🇷 Россиянку не пустили на рейс в Анталью из-за загранпаспорта.
23 октября во Внуково туристке отказали в регистрации на рейс Turkish Airlines, поскольку в её загранпаспорте не оказалось ни одной полностью чистой страницы.
При этом свободного места для новых штампов, по словам самой пассажирки, было достаточно.
Согласно требованиям, на которые сослались при отказе, для въезда в Турцию нужна хотя бы одна полностью пу…
⚠️В Telegram сообщают об опасной уязвимости: мошенники рассылают ссылки, после перехода по которым якобы можно навсегда потерять аккаунт.
Информация пока не подтверждена. Не переходите по подозрительным ссылкам.
Перешлите близким, чтобы они тоже не попались.
🇷🇺 Дагестан становится больше из-за обмеления Каспийского моря.
Уровень воды продолжает снижаться, и некоторые острова уже соединились с материком. Теперь до них можно добраться даже на автомобиле.
По оценкам геологов, площадь Дагестана могла увеличиться с 50,3 до 53 тысяч км².
Получается, территория республики выросла почти на 2 700 км².
Для супружеской пары выбрали отель на Пхукете, с которого началась история мировой сети роскошных курортов.
Долго подбирали отель для отдыха в Таиланде, рассматривали разные варианты и в итоге остановились на действительно интересном месте.
Здесь вместо обычных номеров — отдельные виллы с собственными бассейнами и закрытой приватной территорией. Сам отель расположен в районе одной из лучших бухт Пхукета — Банг Тао.…
Прилетели за границу. А как быть с интернетом? 🌍
Мы разработали собственный eSIM-сервис с выгодными тарифами, которым уже пользуются наши туристы.
Пока подключения обрабатываем вручную, но работаем над автоматизацией, улучшением и удобством сервиса.
Свою главную задачу — обеспечивать выгодным интернетом за границей — он уже выполняет.
Попробуйте и поделитесь обратной связью. Нам важно ваше мнение.
👇 Ссылку для п…
3 принципа которые сделают тебя богатым, если занимаешься торговлей.
Поделись с близкими 👉
👍18🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @abdusamadtravel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@abdusamadtravel edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 October 2026
Most recent edit
21 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Абдусамад про туризм” (@abdusamadtravel), 23,462 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abdusamadtravel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.