Channel
@abdelrahmencolo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,510subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001910302069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abdelrahmencolo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abdelrahmencolo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 3,510 | +30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 3,480 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 3,490 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 3,491 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 April 2025 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,477 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📌 Résumé et principales conclusions de l'article intitulé Correction d'une erreur répandue dans la traduction d'un sublime nom d'Allah. Consultez l'article entier sur le canal Telegram en cliquant ici. https://t.me/abdelrahmencolo
El-salēm ʿaleykum Voici à présent la version complète, augmentée et corrigée, de l'article intitulé Correction d'une erreur répandue dans la traduction d'un sublime nom d'Allah L'étude est désormais disponible dans un seul document PDF. Retrouvez en aussi un résumé en cliquant ici. https://t.me/abdelrahmencolo
El-salēm ʿaleykum Voici la seconde partie de la version augmentée et corrigée de l'article intitulé Correction d’une erreur répandue dans la traduction d'un sublime nom d’Allah. Vous y trouverez, in chā Allāh : - Les raisons pour lesquelles le mot « clairvoyant » ne constitue pas un équivalent satisfaisant du nom divin البصير/El Baṣīr. - L'origine et les causes de cette traduction. - Plusieurs solutions envisageab…
Parmi les points importants abordés dans cette étude, on peut notamment citer ce que l'auteur exposa aux pages 10 et 11. Il y souligna qu'un traducteur ne peut se contenter de considérer le sens linguistique d'un mot. Il lui incombe plutôt de tenir également compte de l'usage qu'en font les lecteurs auxquels sa traduction est destinée. Il écrivit dans ce sens : « Il convient aussi de souligner qu'il incombe au tra…
Voici une étude intitulée El akhṭā° el ʿaqadiyyah fī tarjamāt el-sunnat el-nabawiyyah Le cheikh Ṣāliḥ El-Sindī l'a rédigée il y a près de vingt ans. Elle traite des causes des erreurs dogmatiques présentes dans la traduction des ḥadīths prophétiques. L'auteur y a également exposé un certain nombre de moyens à mettre en œuvre pour endiguer ce phénomène. J'invite toute personne intéressée par la traduction ou inves…
El-salēm ʿaleykum Voici donc la version augmentée et corrigée de l'article intitulée Correction d’une erreur répandue dans la traduction d'un sublime nom d’Allah. Cette seconde version est en deux parties. Voici la première partie en format PDF. Vous y trouverez in chā Allāh : - La signification du nom divin البصير/El Baṣīr. - L'affirmation qu'Allah voit avec ses yeux. - La vue et l'omniscience d'Allah. - La ric…
El-salēm ʿaleykum Je vais prochainement publier une deuxième version augmentée et corrigée de cet article intitulé Correction d’une erreur répandue dans la traduction d'un sublime nom d’Allah La présente version ne me satisfait pas. Après quelques retours de lecteurs, j'ai pu me rendre compte qu'elle est incomplète et que certains passages sont imprécis. Je la laisse tout de même en ligne jusqu'à ce soir, pour qu…
El-salēm ʿaleykum Il m'arrive de voir circuler sur les réseaux sociaux des publications regroupant les noms de certains frères, étudiants en savoir religieux et prédicateurs, ainsi que leurs canaux de diffusion. Je ne souhaite pas que mon nom ni les titres de mes canaux Telegram figurent dans ce type de listes, quel qu'en soit l'auteur. Par le présent message, je demande donc à toute personne ayant mentionné mon n…
Nouvelle série de cours en direct sur le canal telegram https://t.me/cours_exhortations/2734
El-salēm ʿaleykum Je viens de terminer la traduction du prochain livre à paraître Ce fut une magnifique expérience, el ḥamdulillah. C'est un de mes travaux de traduction les plus enrichissants... La suite sur le canal Balāgh en cliquant ici.
Annonçons-le aussi haut et fort Je viens de lire cette publication sur le statut d'un frère. Ce sont quelques lignes publiées il y a plusieurs années par le cheikh Muḥammed ibn ʿUmar ibn Sālim Bāzmūl. Il dit : « Je suis faillible… et je le déclare publiquement. Que personne ne s’imagine que tout ce que j’écris, je le mets parfaitement en pratique. Le manque et les manquements sont dans ma nature. J’implore Alla…
El-salēm ʿaleykum La question suivante fut posée au cheikh Ibn 'Utheymīn : Si une personne pleure sous le poids d’une souffrance intérieure, ces pleurs sont-ils considérés comme contraires à l’endurance et comme une objection au décret et à la prédestination ? Réponse du cheikh : « Cela n’est pas considéré comme une objection ni comme du mécontentement face au décret et à la prédestination. Car cela relève d’une ch…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abdelrahmencolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 20,661 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Les carnets de ʿAbd El-Raḥmēn” (@abdelrahmencolo), 3,510 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abdelrahmencolo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.