Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Caminando el Sendero

Channel

Caminando el Sendero

@abajoelojochungo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,472subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882120830
TypeChannel
Username@abajoelojochungo
DescriptionEl genuino Bertus Reseterus Maximus en Telegram
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/abajoelojochungo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4447,5167,4807 August 2026 — 7,448 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,446 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,444 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,445 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,465 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,489 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,514 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,513 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,515 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,516 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,506 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,510 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,515 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,505 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,499 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,489 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,484 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,483 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,484 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,487 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,482 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,475 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,476 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,478 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,472 subscribers7,4727 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,433–7,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 08:577,472-6
4 Nov 2026, 14:077,478+2
1 Nov 2026, 06:597,476+1
29 Oct 2026, 10:367,475-7
25 Oct 2026, 22:367,482-5
23 Oct 2026, 06:477,487+3
20 Oct 2026, 15:277,484+1
18 Oct 2026, 00:167,483-1
14 Oct 2026, 20:497,484-5
11 Oct 2026, 04:377,489-10
4 Oct 2026, 22:177,499-6
25 Sept 2026, 21:567,505-10
15 Sept 2026, 05:217,515+5
11 Sept 2026, 08:157,510+4
6 Sept 2026, 12:167,506-10
2 Sept 2026, 03:467,516+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:557,515+2
27 Aug 2026, 13:047,513-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:037,514+25
20 Aug 2026, 22:597,489first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.8%
avg views ÷ 7,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,050
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held93 (20 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total100,590
Reactions total4,449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈371
Videos
≈289
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 33s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,486 reactions across 93 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,24433.9%
👍2,58816.7%
👏1,69110.9%
🙏1,2708.20%
🔥9095.87%
🤬3482.25%
🤮2981.92%
💩2851.84%
⚡2761.78%
🤣2491.61%
💯2441.58%
🎉1891.22%
😁1861.20%
🤔1751.13%
😱1681.08%
😢1480.956%
🤩1040.672%
🍾1010.652%
😡930.601%
❤‍🔥920.594%
31 further kinds8285.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,486 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (6.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,940 views95 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/6rctUh6GcKg?is=yAAa5_Wi7EfTO4VL

❤76👍11❤‍🔥3🥰3⚡1😢1

9 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC≈2,120 views173 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://youtu.be/wYgUGWQXjjw

❤131👍19👏13❤‍🔥4🍾3⚡2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 21:50 UTC≈2,530 views98 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://youtu.be/ftM_Ued6swM?is=3qd8kbMzBGhexi1E

❤78👏9👍8❤‍🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC≈3,530 views157 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/TsQD74ioqK4?si=XWlv1uT-a6VDhhb4

❤108👍39🥰5👏4⚡1

6 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC≈3,570 views147 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.larazon.es/espana/sorpresas-sanchez-deja-tiradas-victimas-accidente-urda-acudira-misa-funeral-toledo_202611056aece384ea8d8979977aa244.html

💩87🤬19🤡14😈10🤨7🔥5🤮2👾1

6 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,940 views94 reactionsread 11 November 2026

La Fiscalía Europea investiga tras la tragedia de Urda si hubo fraude en los contratos de la alta velocidad https://okdiario.com/espana/fiscalia-europea-investiga-tragedia-urda-si-hubo-fraude-contratos-alta-velocidad-20713793

👏64👍17🔥8❤3⚡1💯1

5 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC≈2,790 views105 reactionsread 11 November 2026

☝️último vídeo bertusiano

❤73👍24💯8

5 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC≈3,170 views101 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://youtu.be/zUvEN1GPRuc

❤69👍23👏8🗿1

5 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC≈3,510 views178 reactionsread 11 November 2026

☝️Esta gente es un chiste, van de proletarios del pueblo, de querer poner mil impuestos a los ricos y lo hacen no desde la cafetería Manolo, si no desde el Ritz...¡olé! 🥸

🤮111😁30💯16🤨7🍌5🤔4💩3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈3,400 views209 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @wallstwolverineVideo

Ada Colau presenta la tasa TAX THE RICH desde el Ritz.

🤮101💩55🤡21😈8🤣7🖕6❤4🔥4

5 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,720 views115 reactionsread 11 November 2026

☝️Tendré que verlo para creerlo, tenemos la experiencia del 2020, ojito con hacerse expectativas que luego se queden en nada. De momento Trump y JDVance han admitido públicamente haber perdido las elecciones, hoy por hoy con eso me quedo, lo que venga ya se verá.

👍85👀19👏6❤2🎉2😁1

5 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,920 views90 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @rafapalreal

Atención. La oficina del censo de votación de Texas procesó casi 3 millones de nuevos votantes entre los años 2022 y 2024 sin que aportaran ninguna prueba de ciudadanía: Ni certificado de nacimiento, Ni pasaporte ni registro de Nacionalización. Como resultado, el 55% de los "votantes" en Texas eran "nuevos". ¿Hace falta que "traduzca" lo que esto significa? https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2118248772337897554?a=A7…

🤯39🤔15🔥10⚡5🤮5❤4😈4👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @abajoelojochungo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📡 Retransmisión Bendición/Redención📽
@RetransmisionBendicionRedencion · 35,941
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
REDENCIÓN 2020
@mhc70 · 53,764
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 August 2026
CR NETWORK | CR NOTICIAS - CR NEWS
@concienciaradio · 18,863
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 October 2026
𝗦𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝘀 𝗗𝗶𝗷𝗼 🧩
@AS_SeLesDijo · 23,003
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 September 2026
Oliver Ibáñez - Canal Oficial
@oliveribanez · 18,548
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
IVAN DONALSON
@ivandonalsonoficial · 22,929
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
COMUSAV EN ESPAÑOL
@comusav · 57,542
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
CLORITO DE SODIO EN ESPAÑOL❤️🤗
@cloritodesodio · 23,339
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Caminando el Sendero” (@abajoelojochungo), 7,472 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abajoelojochungo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.