Channel
@aatyedwb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002600559664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aatyedwb |
| Description | Мысли и любопытные факты из самых разных областей. В ссылке на канал зашифровано нечто очень красивое. Угадаете, что? |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aatyedwb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 153 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 153 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (23 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,037 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
85 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 42.4% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 22.4% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 17.6% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 5.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Однако широкому изучению подобных эффектов у людей (особенно связанных с психикой) мешает трудность отделения их от культурных. Замечу, что все перечисленные элементы ламарковской эволюции объединяет их частность: каждый из них определяется конкретным метаболическим путём и обеспечивает адаптации к одному конкретному фактору. Для наследования широкого набора приобретённых признаков (заметим, что культура — это как р…
❤6
Элементы ламарковского процесса в живой природе Теория Ж.Б.Ламарка о наследовании приобретённых признаков появилась раньше теории Дарвина. В большинстве случаев оказался прав Дарвин, что было легко ожидать: эволюционирующая по Дарвину система может быть очень простой — наследственность да изменчивость с отбором; для эволюции же по Ламарку система должна уметь изменять саму себя так, чтобы максимизировать свою приспо…
❤4❤🔥2🐳1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
А теперь поговорим о том, насколько развился ИИ. К настоящему моменту с его помощью (причём в основном с помощью моделей, которые пока не вышли в открытый доступ) решено около 20 открытых математических проблем! Теперь уже нет сомнений в том, что ИИ может создавать новое знание, быть творцом! Однако уже почти исчерпан ресурс текстов, доступных для оцифровки и дальнейшего использования в обучении. Сейчас технологичес…
🔥8🐳2
А теперь я докажу вам, что русалки существуют, используя остроумный математический метод! В доказательстве используется лемма: Если данное утверждение истинно, то русалки существуют. Пусть лемма верна. Тогда по ней же русалки существует, условие выполняется. Следовательно, лемма верна и по ней же русалки существуют!
🐳8👏2🤡2
А теперь решение. Оно простое, но точно заставит подумать. 1. Если в белой шляпе только один мудрец, то он, не видя на других белых шляп, сразу поймёт, что она на нём. 2. Если в белых шляпах два мудреца, то один из них может рассуждать так: «Пусть я не в белой шляпе. Тогда единственный человек в белой шляпе понял бы, что он в ней (см.1). А раз он не назвал цвет своей шляпы при первом вопросе, я точно в белой шляпе»…
🔥10
Вот такие чудеса можно делать с пучком параллельного когерентного света.
🔥4🐳1
Ребята сделали микроскоп из капли воды, шприца и лазерной указки🔬
🔥5🐳1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6🐳1
Очень глубокая задача. Однажды царь надел на мудрецов шляпы, запретил им переговариваться и потребовал, чтобы в течение двух часов хотя бы один из них назвал цвет своей шляпы. За неправильный ответ или его отсутствие к концу срока он собирался казнить всех мудрецов. Каждые 5 минут он спрашивал, готов ли кто-то ответить. Неразрешимая задача, не находите? Но через час царь сделал подсказку: он сказал, что у некоторых…
❤3🔥3👍1
Начало в 19:00. Несовершеннолетним можно. Трансляции и записи не будет! Кто-то хочет со мной сходить?
❗️Лекция❗️ «Как нужно и как не нужно использовать лишайники» Один из самых часто задаваемых вопросов о лишайниках (по мимо того как избавиться от них на деревьях 😤) - а какая от них польза человеку? На лекции мы поговорим о традиционной медицине древних и современных БАДах. Вы узнаете как красить ткань лишайниками и почему раньше без них не могла обойтись ни одна лаборатория. Не обойдём стороной и гастрономический …
🤩2🎄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aatyedwb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 526,056 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Размышления” (@aatyedwb), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aatyedwb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.