Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,362–9,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:20
9,377
-1
15 Sept 2026, 09:38
9,378
-5
11 Sept 2026, 15:41
9,383
-22
7 Sept 2026, 03:59
9,405
+4
2 Sept 2026, 06:25
9,401
-22
30 Aug 2026, 05:37
9,423
+5
27 Aug 2026, 14:32
9,418
-7
24 Aug 2026, 07:35
9,425
-19
20 Aug 2026, 16:56
9,444
-4
14 Aug 2026, 13:07
9,448
-13
10 Aug 2026, 17:51
9,461
-14
7 Aug 2026, 20:15
9,475
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:04
9,475
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 9,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
942
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
25 (31 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
6,595
Reactions total
185
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 59s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,140 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
511
44.8%
🔥
312
27.4%
😍
91
7.98%
❤🔥
81
7.11%
custom 5343726841427405712
57
5.00%
🥰
21
1.84%
👍
18
1.58%
💘
15
1.32%
🍾
12
1.05%
🤩
7
0.614%
👏
6
0.526%
⚡
2
0.175%
🍓
2
0.175%
👀
2
0.175%
💯
1
0.088%
😎
1
0.088%
🤝
1
0.088%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2 часть.
Украшения на фото:
КОЛЬЕ «ЛЕТНИЙ ДОЖДЬ»
Стоимость украшения: от 12 000 р. до 13 000 р.
Длина: 50 см.
Пожалуйста, для заказа украшений пишите в личные сообщения @amberworkspacekld
Сами мы никогда не пишем первыми! Если вам кто-то написал от нашего имени, будьте осторожны, это могут быть мошенники!
1 часть.
Украшения на фото:
КОЛЬЕ «ЛЕТНИЙ ДОЖДЬ»
Стоимость украшения: от 14 000 р. до 16 000 р.
Длина: 70 см.
Пожалуйста, для заказа украшений пишите в личные сообщения @amberworkspacekld
Сами мы никогда не пишем первыми! Если вам кто-то написал от нашего имени, будьте осторожны, это могут быть мошенники!
ВСТРЕЧАЕМ «ТО САМОЕ ЛЕТО»
27 августа наступило, и мы рады представить вам новый drop серебряных колье с янтарем.
Мы вдохновились теплым летним дождем, тем самым коротким моментом, когда солнце еще светит, а привычный день вдруг меняется.
Серебро хранит прохладу дождя, янтарь сохраняет тепло солнца, а каждое украшение становится личным якорем воспоминания, к которому можно вернуться прикосновением.
«То самое лето»…
«То самое лето» | новый drop серебряных колье с янтарем
У каждого есть свое «то самое лето». Ливень, который застал в дороге. Теплый вечер у моря. Мокрые улицы после жары. Или тот самый момент, когда солнце еще светит, а с неба уже льется дождь и привычный день на несколько минут становится другим.
«То самое лето» посвящено воспоминанию, которое остается после такого дождя: прохладе воды на коже, свежести воздуха и…
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Совсем скоро мы представим нашу новую коллекцию, и сейчас она проходит последние этапы перед встречей с вами.
Все образцы уже готовы и проходят финальный тест-драйв, чтобы каждая деталь была именно такой, какой мы ее задумали.
Это коллекция о солнечном свете и мудрости природы, выраженной в эстетических формах и узорах, где современные технологии обработки помогают раскрыть янтарь с новой стороны.
Мы уже совсем бл…
Сегодня у бренда «Плеск» особенный праздник. День рождения нашей основательницы Елены.
Мы восхищаемся ее красотой, чувством стиля и тем особенным взглядом на прекрасное, который чувствуется во всем, что она создает. В ее идеях, в дизайне украшений, в любви к янтарю и в том настроении, которое стало неотъемлемой частью «Плеска».
Сегодня мы хотим пожелать нашей основательнице безграничного счастья, вдохновения и внут…
Теперь делимся фотографиями с открытия нашего магазина «ПЛЕСК» в Калининграде!
8 августа случился тот самый день, которого мы так долго ждали. Было много красивых моментов, долгожданных встреч, улыбок и, конечно, немного приятного волнения.
Собрали для вас фотографии, чтобы сохранить здесь атмосферу этого дня и еще раз вместе его вспомнить.
Спасибо, что были рядом с нами в этот важный момент. Нам очень ценно начин…
🔵Новая коллекция украшений со стеклом получилась легкой и прозрачной. Мы собрали в ней три орнамента, и каждый из них создает свое настроение.
Первый орнамент вдохновлен элементом нашего нового логотипа. Мы немного переосмыслили его форму и превратили в легкий всплеск. Этот мотив появился в кольцах и серьгах и добавил украшениям больше движения и воздуха.
Второй орнамент напоминает круги, которые расходятся по воде…
📎Август ощущается как глоток того самого летнего воздуха, когда хочется замедлиться, но при этом не упускать ни одной возможности.
Наряжаться без повода. Выбирать украшения под настроение. Надевать бусы просто потому, что сегодня хочется именно так.
В нашей подборке, янтарь с его теплым солнечным сиянием, графичный гематит и жемчуг, который делает образ особенно легким.
Пусть август длится чуть дольше, хотя бы в н…
Янтарь, который открывается по-новому. 2 часть.
Во второй части разговора говорим о превращении Amber Workspace в ПЛЕСК, новом пространстве бренда и будущем янтаря в современном дизайне.
О том, как меняется восприятие материала и почему иногда достаточно просто посмотреть на привычное по-новому.
Пожалуйста, для заказа украшений пишите в личные сообщения @amberworkspacekld
Сами мы никогда не пишем первыми! Если ва…
❤27❤🔥11custom 53437268414274057125🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @aamberworkspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Плеск (ex. AmberWorkspace)” (@aamberworkspace), 9,377 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aamberworkspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.