Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Админ лох

@aadmin_lo0h4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003888893511
TypeChannel
Username@aadmin_lo0h4
DescriptionХеллоо
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/aadmin_lo0h4

Growth

1411431426 August 2026 — 141 subscribers6 August 2026 — 143 subscribers8 August 2026 — 143 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:32143no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:30143+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:38141first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.3%
avg views ÷ 143 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,904
Reactions total427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
103
Videos
7
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

427 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘6916.2%
🔥6114.3%
custom 5366071236986178267409.37%
🙏358.20%
❤‍🔥347.96%
337.73%
custom 5212956395913117186327.49%
🍓307.03%
🕊245.62%
custom 5240203535294949745214.92%
custom 5415945969185356500204.68%
custom 5190640209699566321133.04%
👾71.64%
🌭51.17%
custom 547425550175778356920.468%
custom 530983240263641266110.234%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC42 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

а я еще такие брелочки сделал .

💘11🕊3custom 52129563959131171863❤‍🔥2custom 53098324026364126611

7 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC94 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кому не нравится новое на канале .то отписка бесплатная.никгго тут не держу

🙏15🍓2🔥2custom 54159459691853565002👾1🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC94 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ооооо что это Дада ,теперь канал будет мультфандом ураа .ещё мейби верну хещтеги чтоб не путаться,но там буквально тока фд будет написано

custom 536607123698617826718custom 52129563959131171865🍓2👾2custom 51906402096995663212🔥1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC97 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знаю как вам,,, но думаю сделать отдельный канал где будут эти мили датебаещечки,а тут тф. Отдельный потому что собираюсь их часто рисовать ,мне принесло больше удовольствия их рисовать чем тф в последнее время . Но если вы не против их тут видеть то я рад🥺

custom 521295639591311718692💘2🔥2custom 54742555017577835692👾1🕊1custom 52402035352949497451

6 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC98 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а еще я почти научился чиби рисовать наконецто

🔥8custom 52129563959131171863custom 541594596918535650031👾1💘1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC97 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

опа мэтт любимый я вообще собираюсь много чего еще рисовать кроме трансформеров как вамха

❤‍🔥16custom 521295639591311718611🔥7custom 51906402096995663213💘2custom 536607123698617826721👾1

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC100 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДОБРОЕ УТРО благодаря одной моей подругей (Я САМ НЕ ОЖИДАЛ) дала голоса в канал и у нас появились немного прем реакции СНОВА СПАСИБО ЕЙ,не ожидал что сработает ихихихих

custom 536607123698617826719custom 524020353529494974516custom 541594596918535650013custom 51906402096995663218💘21🔥1🕊1

5 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC126 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

я не верю

💘33🍓14🔥11🙏5custom 524020353529494974541❤‍🔥1👾1

3 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC106 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну вайб

🔥22💘8🕊5🍓21🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC134 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вы граждане уже бтв

7💘2🕊2🍓1

3 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC120 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Из канала в целую страну

5🕊2🍓1

3 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC134 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Гражданство: админолохострана Национальность: лох Пол: лох

6🙏2🍓1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aadmin_lo0h4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,620 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Админ лох” (@aadmin_lo0h4), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aadmin_lo0h4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.