Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رصمات نص كافي المعوقه🥰

Channel

رصمات نص كافي المعوقه🥰

@a_aaaaannn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534945122
TypeChannel
Username@a_aaaaannn
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/a_aaaaannn

Growth

143166154.519 August 2026 — 165 subscribers19 August 2026 — 166 subscribers27 August 2026 — 143 subscribers19 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 01:36143-23
19 Aug 2026, 23:17166+1
19 Aug 2026, 16:45165first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.0%
avg views ÷ 143 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held17 (18 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total1,800
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4455.0%
🔥1012.5%
❤‍🔥810.0%
🥰67.50%
56.25%
🤩56.25%
💔11.25%
😭11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC44 viewsread 19 August 2026

باقي انا ارسمي لي عيوني

Signed |ㅤسـواد -

19 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

اويلي ع الرصمه الخرافيه🥲 امدحوها #صورة_للأخت_رؤى

❤‍🔥6🤣3🤩2🥰1

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC81 viewsread 19 August 2026

دعممو لكم من تيه الصوره خن نوريكم غيرها حلوه واحلا صوره لسمتها لليوم😊

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC81 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

كان قراري ب الاعتزال بمحله😪

🤣6

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC86 views12 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

انا داريه اني شوهت ام الصوره 😪💔 لا تمدحوها #صورة_للأخت_سعاد

🤣9🤩3

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC85 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

دامكم مروقين خن اوريكم رصمه رصمتها الصباح رغم الاعاقات😊💔

🥰41🔥1

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC114 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

ياعيني ع رصمات البنات تخبل🥲 امدحوها #الأخت_نمارق

🔥94❤‍🔥2🥰1

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC114 viewsread 19 August 2026

استعدو برسل لكم اخر رصمه رصمتها😊

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

19 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC122 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026

باينً صادرً عن الرصامة نص كافي🤓 لقد تم اعتزال الرصم لاسباب مجهوله😬ولا احد يعلم ما هي الاسباب 😁ولكل الناس الذي تم وعدهم ب الرصم نقدم خالص اعتذارنا لانه لن نستطيع رصمكم بسبب اعتزال الرصم وبسبب حرق اصبعي😪💔 ف اشكركم ع تفاعلكم ودعمكم لي في عقوق الرصم 😊👄والا هنا تنتهي قصة الرصم المعاق الذي دامت 4 ايام 😊💔

🤣3💔1😭1

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

18 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC138 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

سواد تعلمي الابداااع ياعيني ياعيني كثرو الرصامين🌞

🤣7

Signed ألانسةه نسكافيةه☕🦋!.

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @a_aaaaannn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,018,295 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رصمات نص كافي المعوقه🥰” (@a_aaaaannn), 143 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a_aaaaannn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.