Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

A7A5 ru

@a7a5

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,181subscribers

+269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002359588577
TypeChannel
Usernames@a7a5 @a7a5official_ru
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/a7a5

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

34,500 average views per post against 11,181 subscribers — an engagement rate of 308.5%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled862,360
Mature posts only321.0% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers11,181 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,171 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.51% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.5% · p90 42.3%
Position in cohort99.961th percentile · 26.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.262% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,91211,18811,0506 August 2026 — 10,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,150 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,146 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,144 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,186 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,188 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers11,1816 August 202612 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net +269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,871–11,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:4711,181no change
12 Aug 2026, 18:2811,181-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:3211,188+2
11 Aug 2026, 15:5211,186+42
10 Aug 2026, 19:1811,144-2
10 Aug 2026, 15:4411,146-4
9 Aug 2026, 18:4111,150no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:2111,150-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:5711,151+9
8 Aug 2026, 11:4011,142+19
7 Aug 2026, 19:0411,123+16
7 Aug 2026, 08:5011,107+22
6 Aug 2026, 20:1011,085+124
6 Aug 2026, 05:2010,961+49
6 Aug 2026, 02:4610,912no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3510,912first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
308.5%
avg views ÷ 11,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
34,500
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.045%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (16 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total862,360
Reactions total389
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

357 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12234.2%
11532.2%
🔥10328.9%
🎉41.12%
👏41.12%
😁41.12%
🤣30.84%
🌚10.28%
🙏10.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,090 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈 Пример из кошелька: 63 неделя пассивного дохода 🔵27 мая 2025 мы пополнили тестовый кошелёк на 500,000 A7A5. Сегодня, на 441-ый день, баланс составляет 562 433 A7A5 🔵За 63 недели баланс вырос на 62 433. Проценты поступают автоматически благодаря механизму Rebase. Как это работает — в нашей документации. 🔵Годовая доходность с момента начала наблюдения ≈ 10,23% 💵 Напоминаем, что с 9 февраля доходность выросла и со

6👍5🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈239,000 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 Покупайте самый дешевый USDT на A7A5 Мы предоставляем лучшие условия на рынке Сравните сами: Курс на 11 августа, 10:30 МСК 🏆 A7A5 — 83 ₽ Bynex — 85,6 ₽ Rapira — 85,2 ₽ BestChange — от 86,1 ₽ 🔵 У нас вы получаете: 🔵 Чистый USDT без санкционного следа. Вся ликвидность проходит проверку через крупнейшей AML-сервис — Elliptic. 🔵 Легальную покупку крипты с банковской карты. Покупайте A7A5 и обменивайте на USDT пря

🔥1613👍11🤣3

10 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,680 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 5 правил, как сохранить депозит в мире депегов Рынок стейблкоинов постоянно проходит проверку на прочность. Согласно актуальной статистике, более 35 проектов, которые раньше имели капитализацию свыше $100M, сегодня фактически перестали работать. Что показывает статистика “кладбища” стейблкоинов: 🔵Совокупная “сгоревшая” стоимость проектов — $54.7B. 🔵Пик закрытий пришелся на 2024–2025 годы — в сумме около половины

🔥93👍3

7 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈2,320 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈 Как работает доходность A7A5 A7A5 позволяет не только хранить средства в рублевом эквиваленте на блокчейне, но и получать дополнительный доход за удержание токенов. 🔵 Разбираем, как работает эта механика и отвечаем на самые частые вопросы: 🔵 Откуда берется доход? Средства, которыми обеспечен токен, размещаются в краткосрочных инструментах денежного рынка, включая овернайт-сделки. Полученный доход распределяется

👍97🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,560 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Итоги конкурса A7A5 за август Спасибо всем, кто принял участие! За этот месяц вы прислали десятки публикаций, обзоров и видео о проекте. Особенно приятно было увидеть, насколько по-разному вы раскрыли A7A5 и сколько интересных идей воплотили в своих работах. ⭐ Поздравляем победителей: 1⃣ Лучший видеообзор проекта Crypto Decoders — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIjHuR73xwk 2⃣ Лучший обзор Цифрового векселя А7

🔥7🎉4👏4👍2

5 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈4,640 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 Резервы: еженедельное обновление Чтобы вы всегда были уверены в A7A5, мы регулярно публикуем обновлённые данные. Ниже свежая информация об обеспечении токена за прошедшую неделю. 📈 28.07.2026 совокупный объём резервов составлял ₽ 45 477 258 426 📈 04.08.2026 он вырос до ₽ 45 606 981 768 📈 Прирост за неделю за счет процентов составил ₽ 129 723 342 🔵 Актуальные данные вы всегда можете самостоятельно посмотреть на

👍74🔥4🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈570,000 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 Мы снижаем стоимость покупки USDT. Для всех. A7A5 предлагает лучший курс покупки USDT на рынке. Просто сравните. Курс на 5 августа, 11:00 МСК 🏆 A7A5 — 80,95 ₽ Bynex — 83,62 ₽ Rapira — 83,51 ₽ BestChange — от 83,67 ₽ 🎯 Но низкий курс - это только часть преимущества. Покупая USDT через A7A5, вы получаете: 🔵лучший курс покупки USDT; 🔵максимально чистые USDT - вся ликвидность проходит проверку через Elliptic. М

👍1514🔥10😁4🌚1

4 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,960 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈 Пример из кошелька: 62 неделя пассивного дохода 🔵27 мая 2025 мы пополнили тестовый кошелёк на 500,000 A7A5. Сегодня, на 434-ый день, баланс составляет 561 032 A7A5 🔵За 62 неделю баланс вырос на 61 032. Проценты поступают автоматически благодаря механизму Rebase. Как это работает — в нашей документации. 🔵Годовая доходность с момента начала наблюдения ≈ 10,17% 💵 Напоминаем, что с 9 февраля доходность выросла и со

👍64🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,220 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵Стейблкоин vs Банковский перевод: что выбрать в 2026 году? Главная разница между банком и стейблкоином — срок зачисления платежа и итоговые издержки. 🏦 Выбор в пользу банка оправдан для локальных платежей внутри одной страны, работы с госсекторами или крупными корпорациями, а также в случаях, когда контрагенту необходим классический документооборот и стандартные процедуры комплаенса. Нужно учитывать, что междуна

👍95🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,630 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 До завершения конкурса контента остался один день Это последний шанс подготовить материал и побороться за награды. Выбирайте любой формат: короткая публикация, экспертный пост, обзор Цифрового векселя А7 или видео о проекте. 🏆 Призы конкурса: 🔵100 000 A7A5 — за лучший видеообзор проекта; 🔵50 000 A7A5 — за лучший обзор Цифрового векселя А7; 🔵по 15 000 A7A5 — авторам пяти лучших экспертных постов; 🔵по 5 000 A7A5 —

🔥53👍3

30 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,050 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌ 3 частые ошибки при ончейн-переводах Блокчейн-транзакции необратимы. Невнимательность при отправке может привести к тому, что вы потеряете доступ к своим активам. 📌 Разбираем три ключевые ошибки пользователей: 1️⃣ Отправление токенов на неподдерживаемую биржу Перед переводом проверьте, поддерживает ли площадка ваш токен. Если биржа не поддерживает токен, он может поступить на её блокчейн-адрес, но не будет зачи

6👍4🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC≈1,980 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵 До завершения конкурса A7A5 осталось всего три дня У вас ещё есть время подготовить материал и побороться за награды. Короткий пост, экспертный разбор, обзор Цифрового векселя А7 или видео — участвовать можно с любым форматом. 🏆 Награды: 🔵 100 000 A7A5 — за лучший видеообзор проекта; 🔵 50 000 A7A5 — за лучший обзор Цифрового векселя А7; 🔵 15 000 A7A5 — за экспертные посты (5 победителей); 🔵 5 000 A7A5 — за коро

👍43🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @a7a5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,952 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A7A5 ru” (@a7a5), 11,181 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a7a5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.