Channel
@a365888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,180subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001314691408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a365888 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a365888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,180 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 1,184 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 1,188 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 1,189 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,195 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 1,195 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 February 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 906 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
狗狗币目前还在底部区域震荡，刚才我在0.0692又买入一些现货狗狗币。目前的价格已经低于挖矿成本。 https://x.com/i/status/2080527292321923255 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年7月24日13:36
狗狗币下跌至0.071时，我又现货买入了一些狗狗币。今日是6月最后一天，狗狗币价格也来到了本月最低点。 https://x.com/i/status/2071932727792710107 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月30日20:26
刚刚又在0.0765买入了一笔狗狗币现货，这波下跌很有可能是本轮熊市的最后一波下跌，继续坚持逢低分批买入，降低平均成本。 https://x.com/i/status/2069803795408941130 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月24日23:25
狗狗币0.0789我有买入了一些狗狗币，目前不知道这个位置能不能支撑住，即使跌破后期也会再次上涨到这个位置，所以采取逢低买入，反弹时可以考虑进行成本互换。 https://x.com/i/status/2069765476968763723 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月24日20:52
🔥狗狗币刚才下跌至0.823时，我买入了一笔狗狗币现货，目前狗狗币周线已经连续四周下跌，如果本周狗狗币周线要上涨，价格至少要在0.08627以上，如果本周继续下跌，那就是连续五周下跌，那下周上涨的概率也很大，所以继续逢低买入，有很大概率本周到下周能实现盈利。 https://x.com/i/status/2064849141499654640 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月11日07:17
刚才在0.0866，把2天前在0.0818买入的狗狗币卖出了，留点资金在手里，如果狗狗币二次探底，那么我会再次买入。 https://x.com/i/status/2063975369116721489 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月8日21:25
😊刚刚把昨天0.0798现货买入的狗狗币在0.0854卖出了，一天时间盈利7%，关键不在于盈利多少，因为最近连续的逢低买入狗狗币，手里的资金已经不多了，卖出留一点资金，万一再次跌破0.08，那我还可以再次买入。 https://x.com/i/status/2063546638535418058 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月7日17:01
🚀继续在0.0798买入现货狗狗币，无论是比特币还是狗狗币已经接近这一波下跌的底部区域。 https://x.com/i/status/2063114711017910332 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月6日12:25
🔥狗狗币自从去年10月10日大跌以来，周线跌幅很少有超过下跌18%，本周还为结束，狗狗币跌幅已经达到18%，我在0.0818又买入了一笔狗狗币。 https://x.com/i/status/2062920130091515972 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月5日23:31
刚刚在0.865又买入一笔狗狗币现货，如果狗狗币继续下跌我还会继续逢低买入。 https://x.com/i/status/2062732542558785847 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月5日11:06
狗狗币下跌至0.0885时，我又主动买入一笔现货狗狗币，另外提前挂单0.09买入的狗狗币订单也自动成交了。 https://x.com/i/status/2062357988128731494 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月4日10:20
刚刚在0.0922又现货买入了一笔狗狗币，前几天在0.095设置的挂单买入狗狗币也在几小时前自动买入了。 https://x.com/i/status/2062013623183270090 此消息已提前10分钟优先发布在“狗狗币VIP群”👉 t.me/doge365/4512 ●狗狗币资讯 @doge365 ●狗狗币交流群 @doge88 ●加密货币分析 @a36599 ●加密货币交流群 @a36522 ●韭菜君交易记录 @a365888 ●365快讯 @k365x ▲发布：2026年6月3日11:29
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @a365888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 398,139 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“狗狗币买卖记录-韭菜君🍀” (@a365888), 1,180 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a365888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.