6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,188–8,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 01:42
8,194
-10
14 Aug 2026, 20:46
8,204
-14
11 Aug 2026, 11:26
8,218
-14
8 Aug 2026, 12:01
8,232
-5
7 Aug 2026, 15:00
8,237
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:59
8,237
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 8,194 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,920
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
21 (24 June 2025 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
1,920
Reactions total
92
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
347
Videos
9
Links
287
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,870 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,090
58.3%
👍
349
18.7%
❤🔥
155
8.29%
👌
109
5.83%
🥰
39
2.09%
🤝
25
1.34%
🤯
25
1.34%
👀
19
1.02%
👏
18
0.963%
😐
15
0.802%
😎
8
0.428%
🤩
7
0.374%
💔
4
0.214%
🤗
4
0.214%
😨
2
0.107%
🫡
1
0.053%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,870reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
123
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZunXBT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2025 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Introducing the ULTIMATE NFT Minter Bot for any Opensea NFT mints
🔗 Link : Click Here
Features :
✦ Supports any OS NFT collection
✦ Supports all chains
✦ Supports all phases : WL, FCFS & Public
✦ NFT minting with multiple wallets
✦ EIP-7702 sponsored transactions
✦ Fund multiple wallets in a single tx
🙋♂️ Grab "Glyph Legend" role on Aztec
1. Visit : https://glyph.aztec.network
2. Authorise ur X acc and generate a pfp and then post it on X
3. Set the generated image as the profile picture either on X or on Discord
4. Then fill up this form
FIRST 3K USERS WILL GET THE ROLE
Update : Claim Legacy role on Oshi's DC
If you participated in Oshi's GATE2 : Tides of Conflict event then claim this role on their discord.
More details : Click Here
Lamumu GTD WL Giveaway
Lamumu is the official NFT collection of Commondotxyz which already have $20M funding
🏆 Reward : 8 GTD spots
+ Follow Lamumu and Common on X
+ Like, RT giveaway tweet
Participate : Click Here
Sentient 2nd Galxe Task
+ Funding : $85M
+ New users can join now
Join : Click Here
Sentient already confirmed reward for completing Galxe tasks for the long term contributors.
If you missed this NFT minting, they have brought another task.
More details : Click Here
Read whole tweet, I even mentioned a simple way to find available domains
Update : Doma Protocol Sand NFT Task
If you all are facing difficulties in finding a real English dictionary word domain with 4 letters, here is the list of those domains, currently available on Doma
+ Link : Domains List
+ Search and register domain here
Main tweet : Click Here
🧩 Alpha : Common and Lamumu (NFT of Common)
+ Raised : $20M + another Undisclosed round from Dragonfly, ParaFi Capital
+ Aura point holders might be eligible for the WL of Lamumu NFT+ airdrop
👉 Read : Click Here
Educational Tweet : What is Rollups? What is the difference between OP and ZK rollups
How does OP Kailua of boundless, making it possible for OP rollup to generate proof ?
Read : Click Here
🔥46😐8
Signed Z U N
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ZunXBT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZunXBT” (@ZunXBT), 8,194 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZunXBT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.