Channel
@ZoomersBookCorner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
616subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001913473220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZoomersBookCorner |
| Description | We do a little reading |
| Created | 2 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZoomersBookCorner |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 616 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 616 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
494 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 109 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 85 | 17.2% | |
| ⚡ | 71 | 14.4% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 12.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 10.1% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 9.92% | |
| 🤯 | 21 | 4.25% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 3.04% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 2.43% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 1.42% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 1.42% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.405% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.405% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.202% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.202% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 6 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I don't usually care about anything non-European in the slightest really but I do find the Ottomans and the Persians interesting to a degree. This is a great overview of the entirety of Persian history from the very beginning up until today. Never got too bogged down and was just the right size for someone who's interested but not obsessed with the topic. Great overview from a great author. Loved his book on Charle…
❤27🔥5🐳1
A gem of a book. Very concise (perhaps too concise?) but to a new reader this book lays out the events brilliantly from the early days of the party all the way up until the seizure of power. Since this book was written at the time, too, there is a lot of details that later historians have felt convenient to leave out. Being written at the time by the literal SS Main Office obviously also causes it to be bias, but it'…
⚡48❤4
There is only so much you can do with so little sources. Edward's Father, Alfred, was obsessive when it came to literacy and learning and the difference in sources really reflects that. Key did his best to form a narrative here but ultimately it's a near impossible task. Interesting nonetheless and truly one of the greats. The Alfred/Edward/Aethelstan trio might be the greatest run we've had. 6/10
👍15
Saint Francis was assigned to the town of Chablais by the Duke of Savoy, a location in which Calvinism had become the new faith 60 years ago and in which anti-Catholic feeling was immense. With a 'gentle' approach however in the form of first preaching and then by slipping Catholic Apologia leaflets into letterboxes and other similar methods he turned the tide. When Francis arrived there was merely 27 Catholics out …
🔥27🤡7❤3👍3
An excellent and highly readable narrative of one of England's greatest Kings. Easy to follow and doesn't get lost in bizarre details. Can't really fault it. 10/10
🤯12❤5👍2🔥2
Sometimes hard to follow Bain's narrative here but that's probably because the situation itself at the time was so unbelievably confusing. An excellent short read of one of the most interesting men of the time. Very little in English on the topic or Scandinavia in general! What a man Charles XII was! 8/10
😁11🔥6👎1
Absolute masterpiece. Marc Morris is probably my favourite British medevial author and once again it's an essentially perfect book. Just the right amount of detail is focused on everything so that the narrative doesn't veer off in bizarre directions and you're able to actually grasp everything that you're reading. Honestly can't fault it. The ultimate history of my people. 10/10
🔥30
Very interesting but also very much a product of its time by which I mean that much of the book is not relevant at all to todays political climate. This mostly applies to the first essay of the two. In general though Maurras was an extremely interesting man. This is all there is of him in English as far as I know and so there isn't much for me to compare this to but it was a very interesting short read. Anyone inte…
🔥18
Excellent military history. At times there can almost be too much detail and it became a little boring, but is that really a knock? It's almost certainly the go-to however when it comes to understanding what on earth was going on with Italy's disasterous second world war (or less disasterous Ethiopian war or Spanish Civil War) 8/10
🔥21
These 'Dark Age' Britain books can really be hit or miss sometimes. I suppose it takes a certain type of person to enjoy such books where the hyperfocus seems to be on autistic details about archeology rather than stringing together a narrative. What some form of narrative does appear the book is great and I couldn't put it down. So much of it is just hyperfixating on archeology though. It's alright. 6/10
👍13
Like the other book I read from him 'Mussolini's Italy' the narrative is just so disgustingly disjointed. Genuinely hard to read at times. There is interesting information in here but due to the way its written there is just so much context missing. Extreme self-admitted anti-Mussolini bias, too. Leaves a lot to be desired. 5/10
😭7😁2
Lacking on details of his early days but really really picks up after his rescue on Gran Sasso. Other books on Mussolini's life tend to be extremely light on content when it comes to Salo and even his death but here Hibbert goes absolutely above and beyond in such incredible detail. Worked wonders for the end of my video and so much information here that is just left out of other biographies. Extremely fairly writte…
👍12⚡8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZoomersBookCorner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,306,452 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zoomer’s Book Corner” (@ZoomersBookCorner), 616 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZoomersBookCorner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.