New article out now on the completely forgotten nationwide anti-Jewish protests of 1753 https://zoomerhistorian.substack.com/p/britains-forgotten-anti-jewish-uprising
❤76🔥23⚡9👏2🏆1

Channel
@ZoomerHistorian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,773subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001820143848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZoomerHistorian |
| Created | 22 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZoomerHistorian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 10,773 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 10,768 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 10,771 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 10,769 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 10,772 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 10,750 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 10,756 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 March 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 19,850 |
| Reactions total | 494 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,943 reactions across 20 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 925 | 31.4% | |
| 🔥 | 605 | 20.6% | |
| 👍 | 387 | 13.1% | |
| ⚡ | 252 | 8.56% | |
| 💯 | 139 | 4.72% | |
| 👀 | 138 | 4.69% | |
| 👏 | 100 | 3.40% | |
| 👎 | 72 | 2.45% | |
| 😭 | 68 | 2.31% | |
| 🫡 | 44 | 1.50% | |
| 💔 | 37 | 1.26% | |
| 🤬 | 32 | 1.09% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 0.815% | |
| 🤓 | 21 | 0.714% | |
| 🖕 | 14 | 0.476% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 0.476% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 0.442% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 0.272% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.238% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.204% | |
| 13 further kinds | 37 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,943reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New article out now on the completely forgotten nationwide anti-Jewish protests of 1753 https://zoomerhistorian.substack.com/p/britains-forgotten-anti-jewish-uprising
❤76🔥23⚡9👏2🏆1
Have you seen someone is finally reuploading all your old videos to YouTube in order? https://www.youtube.com/@zoomerarchive
👀64👍18🙏3🌭2⚡1❤1
Other archives were incomplete and in the wrong order; it seems this one is the only one actually uploading them in order. Anyone is welcome to use any of my stuff and reupload it wherever btw, all yours
❤59👍3⚡1
New Zoomerslop video for Paid Subs The history of the Spanish expulsion of the Jews, the largest and most famous expulsion, and yet done for different reasons to all of the other expulsions. Still working on the very long Oswald Mosley video, as well as a long Enoch Powell video, bear with me! https://zoomerhistorian.substack.com/p/the-spanish-expulsion-of-the-jews
👍73🔥28⚡15❤7👎5😁4
New book review up on Substack, this time Jared Taylor's 'If We Do Nothing: Essays and Reviews from 25 years of White Advocacy' Kindly sent to me by Oldspeak books who now has some of Jared's books in stock in the UK! Most fascinating part for me was Jared's piece about Hurricane Katrina, 'Africa in Our Midst'. I knew there was some looting etc, but I had no idea things were quite so bad, with a complete breakdown …
❤63⚡25🔥4🤮4🌚3
Latest episode in my history of the Jews in Britain for paid subs on Substack is out now Takes us from William of Orange's largely Jewish-funded Glorious Revolution, to the enlargement of the Jewish community in England in the 17th century, and then onto the Jew Bill of 1753, which allowed Jews to become naturalised via application to Parliament. In response to this, there was large scale protests all across the co…
👏73👀21⚡12❤7👍4💊2👻1
Latest episode of the Rhodesia series out now, covering 1972-1977 https://substack.com/home/post/p-205293614
❤87👀23⚡14🔥8👎3🤡1🙏1
It is a damning indictment of the so-called 'white nationalist' movement that some within it are now so obsessed with the idea of forming an alliance with anti-Zionist Muslims that they are actively denying the rape of hundreds of thousands of white females by Afghans, Syrians, Pakistanis and other Muslim migrants.
👍217💯132❤13👎8🖕5🤬4💩2🤡2
The matter of Cromwell readmitting the Jews to England often crops up on the nationalist side of X, some arguing that he did so, others arguing that actually he ignored the Jewish petition to be readmitted. This is a very short article of what actually happened to put the matter to bed, as it's actually a little worse than it sounds https://zoomerhistorian.substack.com/p/did-cromwell-really-let-the-jews
🔥71👍23❤11👀2🤓2⚡1
Second Episode of my history of the Jews in Britain for Paid Subs out now. Cromwell's reputation is in tatters amongst the goyim since they remembered that he let the Jews back in, but what actually happened? No one ever goes into detail on here, but this is the full story. This episode will take us from 1290, when the Jews were expelled in 1290, up until shortly after Cromwell readmitted the Jews in 1656. The shor…
⚡87👀16❤15🤡10💯5🔥3👍2
New Zoomerslop Non-White immigration to Colonial Australia, how it was halted, how the White Australia Policy came to be, and how it was dismantled All Anglosphere patriots will be forced to shill 🇦🇺🇬🇧 https://zoomerhistorian.substack.com/p/the-history-of-the-white-australia
❤146🫡37👌13⚡9🤮8
Started a new paid sub only video series on Substack The Jews have become the main character of the 21st century and the goyim are going absolutely bananas! Much of even our own history is now seen through a purely Jewish lens, leading many to dismiss figures such as Oliver Cromwell out of hand, merely because of a footnote in their careers regarding Jews. Most people ranting about Jews every five seconds actually …
🔥120👎52👍16👀12❤11🤔4🤪3⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZoomerHistorian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 854,862 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zoomer Historian” (@ZoomerHistorian), 10,773 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZoomerHistorian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.