3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,332–1,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:57
1,332
-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
1,333
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:30
1,334
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
14
40.0%
👍
8
22.9%
❤
5
14.3%
🐳
4
11.4%
👏
4
11.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2024 to 2 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Zomma Protocol Poll📢
Options traders, listen up! If you're IN for #USOptions ONCHAIN, imagine trading #CRCL, #COIN, #TSLA or #MSTR options on Zomma (beyond BTC & ETH)! How excited are you? 🔥
YES! Take my money 💰45%
Excited, tell me more 👀45%
Intrigued, need details 🤔55%
Not for me 🤷🏻♂️36%
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊Zomma's Weekly Top Trades (02/09 - 02/15)📊
🔥Big wins this week! Congrats to the traders- Zomma is proud to be on this journey with you! 🚀
ETH $2,400 Put Buy 🟢 +341,236.67%
ETH $2,750 Call Sell 🟢 +147.38%
Ride the waves of volatility⚡ #DeFiOptions #Zomma
More Wins: https://arb.zomma.pro/en/main/trade/BTC-USDC
Looking for options expiring Dec 27? @ZommaProtocol is dominating with the best prices near the spot. 🔥
@GrixFinance's options-chain view gives traders the full picture—real-time quotes, strike prices, and unmatched clarity in one place. 🚀
Don’t miss out—start trading today! 👉 https://bit.ly/x-zomma-loss-coverage
#BTC $100K 🎉🎉🎉
🎟️Loss Coverage Carnival is here🎟️ Keep Your Wins, Zomma Covers Your Loss🛡️
#LossCoverageVoucher supercharges your bull market trades. Claim your voucher, open a position, and predict BTC and ETH price movements. Maybe $120K next?
Claim Voucher Here👉 https://bit.ly/x-zomma-loss-coverage
Easy Poll: Who would have a bigger impact on #Bitcoin and #Ethereum if they won the 2024 U.S. Election?
What #options strategies are best to navigate potential election-driven volatility? 📉📈
🔵 Harris: More Regulation22%
🔴 Trump: Less Regulation44%
⚖️ Neutral: Minimal Impact22%
💡 Uncertain: Wait and See11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⏰Countdown in 30 minutes for your #Options Strategies- #60U would be drawn from listerners who GM below 👋👋 Secret Prizes would also be drawn!
Tune in with top experts from @CegaFinance & @GrixFinance to learn your option strategies!
🗓️ Oct 17, 2024, 22:00 (UTC+8)
Tune in Here 🚀 https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vOGwrgRMPqKB
🚀Pro Strategies for DeFi Options Trading💡
$15M ETH shorts were liquidated—learn how options strategies offer flexibility and protection.
Join top experts from @CegaFinance & @GrixFinance to learn your option strategies!
🗓️ Oct 17, 2024, 22:00 (UTC+8)
Tune in Here 🚀 https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vOGwrgRMPqKB
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ZommaProtocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📢 Zomma Protocol Poll📢
Options traders, listen up! If you're IN for #USOptions ONCHAIN, imagine trading #CRCL, #COIN, #TSLA or #MSTR options on Zomma (beyond BTC & ETH)! How excited are you? 🔥
YES! Take my money 💰45%
Excited, tell me more 👀45%
Intrigued, need details 🤔55%
Not for me 🤷🏻♂️36%
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Easy Poll: Who would have a bigger impact on #Bitcoin and #Ethereum if they won the 2024 U.S. Election?
What #options strategies are best to navigate potential election-driven volatility? 📉📈
🔵 Harris: More Regulation22%
🔴 Trump: Less Regulation44%
⚖️ Neutral: Minimal Impact22%
💡 Uncertain: Wait and See11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2024 to 2 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zomma Protocol” (@ZommaProtocol), 1,332 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZommaProtocol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.