25 measurements spanning 30 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,925–11,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 02:39
11,957
+2
4 Sept 2026, 12:21
11,955
-3
3 Sept 2026, 02:24
11,958
+2
1 Sept 2026, 20:57
11,956
+7
31 Aug 2026, 17:58
11,949
+8
30 Aug 2026, 20:17
11,941
+6
29 Aug 2026, 19:54
11,935
+4
27 Aug 2026, 20:18
11,931
-3
26 Aug 2026, 23:24
11,934
+2
25 Aug 2026, 03:47
11,932
+3
22 Aug 2026, 07:08
11,929
-5
20 Aug 2026, 21:06
11,934
-4
19 Aug 2026, 19:58
11,938
-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:56
11,941
+8
17 Aug 2026, 19:15
11,933
-2
16 Aug 2026, 17:08
11,935
-10
15 Aug 2026, 01:25
11,945
-6
13 Aug 2026, 17:17
11,951
-2
12 Aug 2026, 17:55
11,953
+4
11 Aug 2026, 14:31
11,949
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.9%
avg views ÷ 11,957 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,420
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
17 (6 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
26,500
Reactions total
1,265
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,585 reactions across 17 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,131
31.5%
👍
1,121
31.3%
❤
869
24.2%
😁
170
4.74%
👏
78
2.18%
❤🔥
34
0.948%
🤮
25
0.697%
⚡
24
0.669%
🏆
24
0.669%
👎
21
0.586%
🎉
20
0.558%
😐
19
0.53%
💩
8
0.223%
🕊
8
0.223%
🤨
6
0.167%
🤡
5
0.139%
🥰
5
0.139%
🍓
3
0.084%
🗿
3
0.084%
🤓
3
0.084%
8 further kinds
8
0.223%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,585 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZloyKOTLive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Поздравляю всех с Днём знаний!
Это я в первом классе учусь писать, вместо того, чтоб монтировать видео. Хотя по заброшкам лазили уже тогда. Это начало 90х, их было много!
Я точно знаю, что здесь есть и школьники и студенты. Их не много, но они есть, среди моих подписчиков!
Вам я желаю хорошо учиться! Не "на одни пятёрки", а именно хорошо. Впитывайте знания, повышайте свою эрудицию и интеллект, потому что если прост…
🔦ПОГНАЛИ! Это реальный эксклюзив! Вы этого ни у кого не видели и не увидите!
Мы смогли попасть ОЧЕНЬ глубоко под Институт ядерной физики при МГУ и нашли там заброшенный ЦИКЛОТРОН. Это такая ядерная установка=) Выпуск просто ТОП и доступен на всех площадках
⛔️ СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
❤️ Смотреть в ВК Видео
📹 Смотреть на RUTUBE
Разбирался в архивах и наткнулся на интересные фото. Я уж и забыл, что когда мы разрабатывали концепт "Злого Кота", один из вариантов образа был не тактический черный костюм, как сейчас, а вот такой стиль😁 Как вам? Смотрели бы такое?
В процессе создания концепции было вообще много разных забавных историй. Если хотите их послушать лично от меня, то у вас есть такая возможность. В сентябре я буду выступать с рассказом …
🔦Погнали!
🇯🇵ФИНАЛ Японской саги о нашем путешествии!
Реальный эксклюзив и полная хронология событий того, что же НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ произошло в сентябре 2025 года на Фукусиме! Приятного просмотра.
⛔️ СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
❤️ Смотреть в ВК Видео
📹 Смотреть на Rutube
🇯🇵ФИНАЛ БЛИЗКО!
10 серия нашего безумного путешествия. КАК ЭТО БЫЛО НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ.
В этой серии вы увидите всю правду без прикрас, что будет, если пойти в красную зону Фукусимы!
Приятного просмотра.
⛔️СМОТРЕТЬ НА YouTube
❤️Смотреть в ВК видео
📹Смотреть на Rutube
Меня очень веселит использовать нейросетки во время монтажа. В выпуске из бомбаря и лагеря отвел душу и комменты разделились на два лагеря. Одним очень зашло, другие стерли пальцы о том, что ИИ это зло. В любом случае - раньше ломал голову, какой мем вставить, чтоб вот в этот момент зритель понял, что именно я почувствовал, а теперь вжух и нарисовал🤭
Точно так же нейросетки можно использовать и с текстами. Я пока не…
🔦Погнали! ЕДЕМ ИЗ Токио в ФУКУСИМУ!
8-ая серия Безумных приключений в Японии🇯🇵
ЗА КАДРОМ основных выпусков!
⛔️ СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
❤️ Смотреть в ВК Видео
📹 Смотреть на RuTube
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ИТОГИ КОНКУРСА!
Кто пропустил, в видосе про министерский бункер, я разыгрывал наши кружки!🍻
Напомню, что суть была в том, что бы разгадать то, как я запутал следы, дабы скрыть реальное местоположение объекта.
Была подсказка "Причем здесь кофе?"
Ответ был почти на поверхности.
Как есть кофе 3 в 1, так и в видео снято 3 разных места. Они находятся относительно недалеко друг от друга, но всё же не слоёным пирог…
По всей России горят хрущевки и панельки! Понимаю, что вы устали от подобных новостей, но если вы давно думали заказать нашу кружку, кажется сейчас самое время.
Вб в огне и мы в огне, думаем, где брать денег, чтоб заказать новую партию😐
Сюда тыц 👇
🍺КРУЖКА ХРУЩЁВКА
🍺КРУЖКА ПАНЕЛЬКА
👍93😐19❤15💩5🕊5👎4🔥3🗿3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ZloyKOTLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ютуб канал "Заброшенная Россия" @AbandonedRussia · 43,223 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
Custom Truck @customtrucktelegramm · 30,659 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZLOY KOT - Хроники забытого” (@ZloyKOTLive), 11,957 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZloyKOTLive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.