Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 91 days, net +171. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,900–12,154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 01:56
12,124
-1
6 Nov 2026, 00:06
12,125
+7
4 Nov 2026, 21:00
12,118
+4
3 Nov 2026, 17:07
12,114
+8
2 Nov 2026, 14:06
12,106
+3
1 Nov 2026, 14:36
12,103
-2
31 Oct 2026, 15:30
12,105
+10
30 Oct 2026, 12:16
12,095
+14
29 Oct 2026, 15:10
12,081
+13
28 Oct 2026, 11:08
12,068
+10
27 Oct 2026, 14:04
12,058
+4
26 Oct 2026, 12:11
12,054
+2
25 Oct 2026, 15:16
12,052
+7
24 Oct 2026, 14:45
12,045
-2
23 Oct 2026, 15:10
12,047
-2
22 Oct 2026, 11:59
12,049
-3
21 Oct 2026, 02:38
12,052
+1
18 Oct 2026, 21:06
12,051
-1
17 Oct 2026, 20:06
12,052
-6
16 Oct 2026, 22:37
12,058
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 12,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,050
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held
25 (6 July 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total
24,320
Reactions total
1,145
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,240
Videos
≈75
Links
≈194
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,199 reactions across 25 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,796
34.5%
🔥
1,400
26.9%
❤
1,111
21.4%
😢
189
3.64%
❤🔥
180
3.46%
😁
170
3.27%
👏
81
1.56%
🤮
34
0.654%
🎉
31
0.596%
⚡
24
0.462%
🏆
24
0.462%
👎
21
0.404%
😭
20
0.385%
😐
19
0.365%
💘
12
0.231%
💩
9
0.173%
🕊
8
0.154%
🥰
8
0.154%
👀
6
0.115%
🤡
6
0.115%
20 further kinds
50
0.962%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 25 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZloyKOTLive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вышли прогуляться на заброшку с Аней, Мухом и Димоном Эмигрантосом. Конечно мы снимали выпуск, но он выходил довольно скучноватым, однако потом произошло то, чего я не ожидал вообще никак. Под конец прогулки мы встретили подписчиков. Сначала мы их приняли за охрану, потом они нас. Пошугались друг друга, но в итоге познакомились и это оказалось настоящим подарком судьбы, потому что как оказалось мы за 4 часа не нашли …
🔦 Погнали! Нашли заброшенный санаторий со светом и водой, но его сносят!
На лайт канале новый видос!
▶️Смотреть на YOUTUBE
🟦Смотреть в ВК Видео
📹Смотреть на rutube
⛴Заброшенная подводная лодка в Китае!🇨🇳
Друзья, мы в своем небольшом, но очень дружном сообществе блогеров-сталкеров, очень давно хотели попасть в это место, но Димон Эмигрантос опередил нас всех и это однозначно заслуживает вашего внимания!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7d_eCQqeg0
🔦Погнали!
😝САМАЯ засекреченная дача Сталина "Зелёная роща"🩸
Мне кажется, я еще никогда не находил так много исторических фактов и при этом всё равно думал, что ничего не знаю об этом месте, потому что 90% материалов ДО СИХ ПОР под грифом СЕКРЕТНО! Приятного просмотра!
▶️ Смотреть на YOUTUBE
🟦 Смотреть в ВК ВИДЕО
📹 Смотреть на Rutube
ZLOY KOT 🐈 «Хроники забытого. Япония» — в подборке лучших travel-блогов 2026 года!
После «Слёта под рюкзаком» вышла большая подборка проектов премии «Звезда под рюкзаком», в которую вошли победители и финалисты этого года. И среди них — мой проект!
Организаторы отметили наши экспедиции по заброшенным японским шахтам, опустевшим городам Фукусимы и другим местам, где история буквально застыла во времени.
Приятно оказат…
Друзья!
Многие мне писали, что настоящая романтика, это не приехать к буранам на машине, как это сделал я, а трушно протопать по степи 35км в одну сторону, не приняться и пройти еще столько же обратно!
Вот специально для вас у меня есть прекрасная новость! У Толяныча вышло видео про его поход на Байконур! Приключения и адреналин просто зашкаливают. Очень рекомендую к просмотру и тем, кто хотел посмотреть на нелегаль…
Поздравляю всех с Днём знаний!
Это я в первом классе учусь писать, вместо того, чтоб монтировать видео. Хотя по заброшкам лазили уже тогда. Это начало 90х, их было много!
Я точно знаю, что здесь есть и школьники и студенты. Их не много, но они есть, среди моих подписчиков!
Вам я желаю хорошо учиться! Не "на одни пятёрки", а именно хорошо. Впитывайте знания, повышайте свою эрудицию и интеллект, потому что если прост…
🔦ПОГНАЛИ! Это реальный эксклюзив! Вы этого ни у кого не видели и не увидите!
Мы смогли попасть ОЧЕНЬ глубоко под Институт ядерной физики при МГУ и нашли там заброшенный ЦИКЛОТРОН. Это такая ядерная установка=) Выпуск просто ТОП и доступен на всех площадках
⛔️ СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
❤️ Смотреть в ВК Видео
📹 Смотреть на RUTUBE
Разбирался в архивах и наткнулся на интересные фото. Я уж и забыл, что когда мы разрабатывали концепт "Злого Кота", один из вариантов образа был не тактический черный костюм, как сейчас, а вот такой стиль😁 Как вам? Смотрели бы такое?
В процессе создания концепции было вообще много разных забавных историй. Если хотите их послушать лично от меня, то у вас есть такая возможность. В сентябре я буду выступать с рассказом …
❤102👍67😁18❤🔥10🔥7⚡5🤮2💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ZloyKOTLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Русские тайны @russecrets · 18,895 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
ютуб канал "Заброшенная Россия" @AbandonedRussia · 43,169 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
ШТРЭБУХ @Shtrebuh · 32,710 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 10 September 2026
Custom Truck @customtrucktelegramm · 31,064 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZLOY KOT - Хроники забытого” (@ZloyKOTLive), 12,124 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZloyKOTLive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.