Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Живич (мой никнейм не склоняется)

Channel

Живич (мой никнейм не склоняется)

@Zhivich_gnomik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,978subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517338739
TypeChannel
Username@Zhivich_gnomik
Created4 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zhivich_gnomik

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,9786,0536,015.57 August 2026 — 6,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,043 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,037 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,040 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,031 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,029 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,024 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,017 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,014 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,998 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,989 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,978 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,967–6,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:415,978-11
13 Sept 2026, 19:395,989-9
10 Sept 2026, 09:015,998-16
5 Sept 2026, 03:216,014-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:186,017-7
29 Aug 2026, 21:346,024-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:476,029-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:436,031-9
17 Aug 2026, 09:436,040+3
13 Aug 2026, 18:146,037-6
10 Aug 2026, 21:386,043-9
7 Aug 2026, 21:326,052-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:156,053no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:046,053first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,176 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,83257.7%
🍓34811.0%
👍32810.3%
😭2136.71%
🎉1996.27%
😈1434.50%
👾983.09%
💅100.315%
😇50.157%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Zhivich_gnomik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC837 views342 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Постепенно возвращаюсь в строй, накопилось всякого🫡

210🍓73👍37🎉13💅3👾2😇2😈1

10 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,610 views256 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Фу мне непонравилось забейте

😭19235👾21🍓8

10 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,840 views434 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Внимание опущенный говноед, король чуханов

👍254106😈64🍓10

10 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,210 views196 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chertopolokhbPhoto

Мошенники создают ботов с юзернеймом художников и через них предлагают купить якобы подписку за звëзды. Не ведитесь! Также проверьте свои каналы и предупредите аудиторию, под разнос попадают даже самые маленькие авторы

165🍓30🎉1

9 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,890 views407 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мерч по кроворостку чтооооо

285😈64🍓45🎉13

7 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈2,380 views545 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет у меня отходняк от пищевово отравления

354🍓95👾73🎉17😇3😈3

30 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,800 views286 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нянч брелки кстати одна из последних поставок на БП больше я их допечатывать не буду 🤫🤫🤫

190🎉43🍓33😭20

30 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,390 views253 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Болотная полка снова пополнена! Из новенького пока только зеленый бабизянчик из стикерпака, но брелочек!!! А еще всеми любимые принты Птицу ЕМЪ и брелки по НЯНЧ снова доступны😘😘😘 МЕТРО ЧИСТЫЕ ПРУДЫ ПОЛКА 6.5

166🎉39🍓35😈11💅2

26 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈3,180 views457 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ПРИВЕТ ЗДОРОВЯЯЯК СПАСИБО ЧТО ПРИШЕЛ НА МОЮ ФАНВСТРЕЧУ И НАРИСОВАЛ ЧУДЕСНЫЕ КАРТИНОЧКИ🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 Охуенно посидели друзья, реально большое спасибо! То что мне нарисовали в скетчбуке и наброски с подписчиков😇 можете в комменты кидать что вам нарисовали другие и я😘

321🎉73👍37🍓19💅5👾2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Zhivich_gnomik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Живич (мой никнейм не склоняется)” (@Zhivich_gnomik), 5,978 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zhivich_gnomik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.