Channel
@Zhenskyy
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,935subscribers
-658 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001109871037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zhenskyy |
| Description | Без глянца, но с душой Здесь можно быть собой. Без суеты. Без перегруза. Просто и с теплом. Контакты: @kristina_tg |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zhenskyy |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
9,700 average views per post against 7,969 subscribers — an engagement rate of 121.7%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 116,350 |
| Mature posts only | 121.7% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 7,969 measured 3 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.603th percentile · 8.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.045% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 22:14 | 7,935 | -20 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 7,955 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:39 | 7,969 | -289 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 8,258 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 8,273 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 8,279 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 8,290 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 8,303 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 8,318 | -13 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 8,331 | -20 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 8,351 | -31 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 8,382 | -37 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 8,419 | -42 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 8,461 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 8,486 | -42 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 8,528 | -38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 8,566 | +280 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 8,286 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 8,299 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 8,328 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (25 May 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 88,390 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 02:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (36.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ч.3 И, наверное, самое сложное перестать ждать, что однажды человек станет таким, каким ты его когда-то увидела или каким очень хотела его видеть. Ведь жизнь проходит здесь и сейчас. Не в тот момент, когда он изменится, не тогда, когда наконец всё поймёт, а именно сейчас!!! Стоит задать себе один очень простой вопрос: Сколько ещё своей жизни я готова отдать на то, чтобы эти отношения наконец стали такими, какими …
Ч.2 А если посмотреть на это с точки зрения энергии… Подумайте, сколько сил уходит на человека, который постоянно занимает ваши мысли. Ты просыпаешься и думаешь о нём, занимаешься своими делами и всё равно мысленно возвращаешься к вашим разговорам. Анализируешь его слова, поступки, которые ранили твою душу, пытаешься понять, что он имел в виду, почему так поступил, что чувствует, чего хочет. Что происходит у него в …
Ч.1 Почему в разрушительные отношения часто попадают женщины с большим внутренним ресурсом? Знаете, я давно хочу обратить внимание на одну вещь. Почему-то принято считать, что в отношения с нарциссами попадают женщины, у которых низкая самооценка, которые не умеют за себя постоять, боятся одиночества и слишком сильно зависят от мужчины. Но я бы не стала так упрощать эту историю. Потому что в жизни всё совсем не та…
Состояние души многих женщин во всем мире… а после мы станем целостными…
Сказка ложь, да в ней намек! Добрым молодцам урок Вижу сейчас в отечественном кинематографе экранизации сказок и сериалы по мотивам фантастики братьев Стругацких. И знаете, мне это даже нравится. Психологически поучительные сценарии, которые показывают вероятность событий и выборов в положительном направлении. Фантастика, сказка - это ведь далеко не инфантильная история… а глубокий смысл. И чем дальше думаю, тем я…
Как же мне красиво! Такая мудрость, свет, грусть и любовь необъятная одновременно. 🕊️ Такая глубина … жизни людей
Ааа… новый айфон для совсем лютых СДВГешников…
Я выбираю, чтобы наши дети не несли через всю жизнь боль, с которой мы можем начать разбираться уже сегодня. Я выбираю для них новый, прекрасный мир, где дух, душа и тело будут в гармонии. Где разум и душа будут помогать друг другу, быть союзниками. Где человек сможет раскрыть себя, свои возможности. Мир, где не нужно прятать себя, чтобы быть удобным и потом страдать из-за этого, подавлять свои чувства и гасить свою…
Если человек всю жизнь жил в страхе, подавлял свои чувства, терпел, не умел говорить о своих переживаниях, срывы, агрессия, то он мог передать это своим детям не потому, что хотел причинить им боль, а потому, что сам по-другому не умел, не видел, а кто-то видел, но выбирал привычное, так проще и легче… А дети вырастают и продолжают жить по тем же сценариям, и не всегда или не сразу понимая, откуда у них это берётся.…
Обратите внимание, сколько сейчас людей сталкиваются с депрессией, паническими атаками, тревожностью. Я сама знаю, что такое панические атаки, ощущения удушья/нехватка воздуха. Ох… 😢 Что я поняла? Как же важно, чтобы рядом в такие моменты был человек, который тебя понимает и воспринимает твоё состояние серьёзно. Потому что очень часто вместо поддержки ты слышишь: «Ой, ты опять себе что-то напридумывала», «Ты всё ус…
💍 Оригинальное кольцо-браслет из 19 века. Очумелые ручки ювелира.
Эта мода в народе называется «Голодранцы» Tom Ford… эхххх…. Порвать задние карманы и носить под джинсами семейные трусики-тусики. И всё это очередное продвижение нормализации нищеты, искусно упакованной в модный тренд и продаваемой за большие деньги.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Zhenskyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Женская Корпорация ⚜️” (@Zhenskyy), 7,935 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zhenskyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.