#斗门会所 #珠海会所 #中山会所 #江门会所 #斗门 斗门西埔 上图为店内佳丽 店铺名: 观乐会所 体验项目:全裸胸一手一 价位:580元 时常:70分钟 服务满意度:9分 环境满意度:8分 在斗门附近的可以预约 这店质量挺高 香洲‖拱北‖斗门‖金湾‖横琴‖金鼎‖湾仔 全方位安排 珠海客服: @UUmm121 江门专属客户: @ffooh4
❤2

Channel
@Zh95zhen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11,537subscribers
+3,876 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002584851211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zh95zhen |
| Description | 新加入的朋友可以点入关注,进频道不迷 致力于会所 珠海商K 甄选客服: @UUmm121 聊天群:https://t.me/YaoJing9596 反馈频道: https://t.me/YuJi9494 澳门桑拿:https://t.me/AaoMen956 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zh95zhen |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 04:20 | 11,537 | +140 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:18 | 11,397 | +37 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 11,360 | +46 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 11,314 | +72 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 11,242 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:25 | 11,243 | +17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:56 | 11,226 | +46 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:08 | 11,180 | +53 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:39 | 11,127 | +74 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:27 | 11,053 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 11,050 | +49 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:49 | 11,001 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 11,009 | +52 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 10,957 | +39 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 10,918 | +43 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 10,875 | +43 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:30 | 10,832 | +38 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 10,794 | +32 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 10,762 | +23 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 10,739 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (20 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 46,766 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 90.2% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#斗门会所 #珠海会所 #中山会所 #江门会所 #斗门 斗门西埔 上图为店内佳丽 店铺名: 观乐会所 体验项目:全裸胸一手一 价位:580元 时常:70分钟 服务满意度:9分 环境满意度:8分 在斗门附近的可以预约 这店质量挺高 香洲‖拱北‖斗门‖金湾‖横琴‖金鼎‖湾仔 全方位安排 珠海客服: @UUmm121 江门专属客户: @ffooh4
❤2
#珠海会所 #珠海水疗 #珠海94 #珠海 #全裸水床 珠海T4 · 94会所【全场00后水床!】 黄婆帮不了你的 交给客服来安排 以前没开吾之前总觉得:哪个好人会 去这种地方,现在开智了只想:哪个 好人带我去这种地方😄 经理靓仔🧑💼 @UUmm121 私信限制🤖@nnnnoteamb_bot 绕开中介(免费提供咨询)靠谱经理
❤1
#澳门会所 #澳门水疗 #澳门桑拿 #珠海会所 珠海T4 · 会所【澳门桑拿水疗】 澳门桑拿水疗挑选技师,经专人由中国、日本、韩国、欧美、越南、泰国、台湾等地区精心挑选驻场,样貌精致,身材窈窕,并且必须付合体检, 唯一客服经理: @UUmm121
❤2
#珠海会所 #珠海水疗 #珠海水床 #澳门桑拿 #澳门会所 珠海.澳门T4 · 94会所【全场00后水床!】 做的是会所、交的是朋友处的是信任 不管我们认不认识,只要你来到珠海 报“预约即可”,为您安前马后 想要娱乐更有性价比(我在珠海等你) 全区项目覆盖:拱北、夏湾、前山、吉大、唐家湾、南平、金鼎、湾仔、三灶、白蕉、井岸、平沙、南水、乾务、红旗等等各区 资深客服🧑💼 @UUmm121 私信限制🤖@nnnnoteamb_bot 绕开中介(免费提供咨询)靠谱经理
❤2👏1
#珠海会所 #珠海水疗 #珠海水床 #澳门桑拿 #澳门水疗 珠海T4 · 94会所【澳门桑拿水疗】 👅年级:99 🎀花名: 横琴湾仔店111技师 👙三围: 165-D 💵课费:479 🏷️班次: 夜班 07.00 特点: 服务之星,服务非常好 多位客人认可 服务非常好 喜欢服务型的可以多来 资深客户经理: @UUmm121
#珠海会所 #海选 #珠海水床 #全裸海选 圈子里信息繁杂,各类消息真假难辨,与其盲目四处打听、踩坑碰壁,不如直接找靠谱的人对接。 ——大队唯一认准商家 所有流程透明清晰,没有隐形消费,不捆绑办卡充值,安心省心。 周末客流比较集中,位置有限,有计划过来的师兄,建议提前和我沟通安排。 我一直坚守初心,踏踏实实做好每一次接待,用真诚换信任,希望每一位过来的朋友,都能拥有舒服自在的体验,不负这份相遇! 大队认证客服:@UUmm121 双向机器人🤖 @nnnnoteamb_bot
💩3
#珠海 #珠海全区 #珠海海选 #珠海水床 惠州.江门T4会所—珠海T4胸推海选会所】 抛掉矜持,释放男人的兽性🐅这里 不玩虚的 直接开整 肢体升温,雪白大奶让你触感爆表 全程无死角零距离接触,让你上手体 验感拉满🤗 萝莉、御姐、辣妹、清纯学妹等等 客服经理 @UUmm121 双向联系: @nnnnoteamb_bot
📍吉大新店|静谧会所 风格欧式 干净卫生 暖黄光影,雅致空间 沉浸式放松,给身体一场温柔疗愈 #珠海会所 #海选 #珠海水床 #全裸海选 唯一客服经理: @UUmm121
#珠海会所 #海选 #珠海水床 #全裸海选 女人好比车⛽,既然玩到高配,何必在付油钱,舍得加油才有推背感,习惯自动挡玩什么其他档 人生苦短,及时行乐,难道你是为了省那点不值得一提的小钱吗?师兄们60岁以后看的逼空流泪呀,珍惜眼前,活在当下,趁年轻,加油寻找不一样的感觉 我的大哥们屹立不倒,永远雄起 唯一客服经理: @UUmm121
❤2
湾仔888技师好评 还是一如既往的好身材,颜值,服务都挺好的 他的老顾客回头 #珠海会所 #海选 #珠海水床 #全裸海选 唯一客服经理: @UUmm121
珠海 9️⃣4️⃣高端商务场 澳门桑拿商务接待 最近价格实惠,优惠多多,澳门那边 更有买一送一活动 您的专属模式已启动 横琴水🛏️.拱北水🛏️.前山水🛏️--豪华高大上 水床爽歪歪 斗门井岸,金湾南水 环境好 南屏店里美女多多 明珠店,坦洲14村口 24小时 预约客服: @UUmm121 ps:94跟95的区别就是 流程一样,只是无爆。中式按摩、波推臀推、过水刮痧、毒龙,漫游,舔蛋蛋 #珠海会所 #澳门桑拿 #海选 #水床 联系客服: @UUmm121
❤2
#珠海会所 #中山会所 #江门会所 斗门西埔新青附近 店铺名: 澜玉SPA会所 体验项目:全裸胸一手一 价位:580元 时常:70分钟 服务满意度:9分 环境满意度:8分 香洲‖拱北‖斗门‖金湾‖横琴‖金鼎‖湾仔 全方位安排 珠海客服: @UUmm121 江门专属客服 @ffooh4
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @Zh95zhen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Zh95zhen edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Zh95zhen named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“珠海.澳门会所探花甄选” (@Zh95zhen), 11,537 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zh95zhen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.