Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zevakkina

Channel

zevakkina

@ZevakkinaZevaet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

498subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003732584401
TypeChannel
Username@ZevakkinaZevaet
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 22 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZevakkinaZevaet

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

467498482.511 August 2026 — 476 subscribers11 August 2026 — 476 subscribers17 August 2026 — 471 subscribers25 August 2026 — 472 subscribers31 August 2026 — 467 subscribers9 September 2026 — 491 subscribers18 September 2026 — 498 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:21498+7
9 Sept 2026, 13:35491+24
31 Aug 2026, 18:56467-5
25 Aug 2026, 14:45472+1
17 Aug 2026, 18:43471-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:41476no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:16476first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 47s
Average length
3m 47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3732.7%
💘2320.4%
🍓2118.6%
🔥1715.0%
1513.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
46
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZevakkinaZevaet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC481 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

💚💚 Сегодняшний пост будет 💚💚 немного не по теме канала, хотя, как знать, в дальнейшем мне бы хотелось больше делиться не только разборами, но и какими-то своими мыслями и идеями. Будем считать это первым шагом. 💚 Так вышло, что сегодня, 💚 14 июля, у меня happy birthday. Этот год был по-настоящему насыщенным, особенным, и, к сожалению, мне пришлось столкнуться не с самыми приятными событиями, это также послужило тому

17 Jun 2026, 23:03 UTC874 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌫️🌫️ На данный момент я изучаю информацию для разборов и подбираю темы для будущих разговорных видео в тик-ток! Интернет-пространство всегда активно, а мне есть чем поделиться и какие темы поднять касаемо визуальных новелл. 🤩 Я хочу разбавить канал более лёгким контентом. Помимо разборов, планирую добавлять больше хед-каноны и зарисовки сценок по вашим предложениям, ну и, конечно, по своим идеям. Вы можете предлага

13 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌫️🌫️Теперь у канала есть (чат) Здесь можно просто поболтать, поделиться мыслями, задать вопрос или обсудить что-то интересное. 🤩

13 Jun 2026, 00:05 UTC≈4,060 views0 reactions46 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Итак, МС, твой выбор: дрель или молоток? 🌟🌟 Наконец-то я 🌟🌟 закончила разбор, о котором меня просили, особенно один ну очень нетерпеливый подписчик, который уж очень неравнодушен к этому изобретательному немцу. Уверена, здесь найдутся те, кто разделит ее. любовь и мнение. Разбор дался мне немного дольше и сложнее, чем я думала, но, думаю, оно того стоило: материала было много, и мне действительно было о чём порасс

7 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 11 August 2026

✨Про разбор я не забыла, опубликую его на днях, ожидайте! ✨В жизни сейчас происходит достаточно важный этап, я стараюсь что-то делать, когда есть на это время и силы, спасибо, что ждёте. Поскольку создание контента требует времени, а мне не хочется, чтобы канал совсем пустел, я думала сделать отдельный чат. Не думаю, что туда вступит много людей, но даже в этом случае хочу создать спокойное и непринуждённое место дл

7 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

🌫️🌫️ Кстати, недавно я 🌫️🌫️ сняла с этим отзывом на "Craks – too late frozen" видео в TikTok, с которым вы можете ознакомиться и поделиться. Для удобства и для тех, у кого нет Tiktok, продублирую его сюда.

7 Jun 2026, 18:21 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 Любите мрачные 🌟 🌟 визуальные новеллы 🌟 о депрессии, выгорании и попытках спрятаться от всего внешнего мира, потому что жизнь стала почти невыносимой? Лично я, очень ценю подобные проекты: не романтизируя, а именно передавая вязкую натуральность ужаса происходящего. В этом "Craks – too late frozen" звучит как проект заслуживающий вашего внимания. Это визуальная новелла, которая заметно выделяется на фоне больш

20 May 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Делать ли разбор на Стрейда? 💀

  1. да95%
  2. нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳 В последнее время я перебирала варианты следующего разбора и выбирала между Стрейдом и Лоуренсом. Поскольку про Лоуренса мало что можно сказать, да и до версии YKMET с ним остается около года, я решила, что будет логичнее сделать разбор уже после выхода игры, мне также хочется провести параллели между новой и старой версией. Поэтому мне хотелось бы сделать разбор Стрейда, после чего я сяду за две круп

3 May 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,820 views0 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Твоя задача - выжить. Горы место опасное, понимаешь? Наконец-то я завершаю серию разборов главной троицы «The Price of Flesh» последним участником торгов! Его особенно ждали, просили все последние недели, так что пришлось поработать над ним дольше обычного - но, думаю, оно того стоило. Чуть позже я вернусь к переводам на английский, которые в ближайшие часы опубликую на своём Tumblr, и займусь другими разборами, ко

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZevakkinaZevaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 May 2026, 18:27 UTCFinal Results245 voters

Делать ли разбор на Стрейда? 💀

  1. да95%
  2. нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zevakkina” (@ZevakkinaZevaet), 498 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZevakkinaZevaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.