Channel
@ZeroXboberS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002440524602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZeroXboberS |
| Description | 🦫The Beaver hacker group🦫 Связь с бобрами - @zboberkurwa |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZeroXboberS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 202 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 202 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 April 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 139 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
247 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5192782200084372056 | 81 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5242451907724716893 | 55 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5193013887800186923 | 31 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5235701688014217208 | 23 | 9.31% | |
| custom 5235743684204437322 | 19 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5235578512647134770 | 18 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5240330838125583946 | 16 | 6.48% | |
| custom 5240208045010591178 | 2 | 0.81% | |
| custom 5240422063230951650 | 2 | 0.81% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZeroXboberS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На случай, кто еще не посмотрел, залили фильм на Rutube. https://rutube.ru/video/87f6889b8198c2d11ec47c7d066f7050/
custom 523570168801421720811custom 52403308381255839467custom 51927822000843720566custom 52357436842044373222
А вот и результат апелляции🙂 Защищают пользователей от правды😁
custom 523574368420443732214
Всем, ку👋 Снова ютуб показал "свободу слова"😂 Наш фильм удалили с площадки, в прочем, как и прошлый🚬 Мы подали апелляцию, но понимаем какой будет результат. За то мы знаем точно, фильм дошёл до адресата и попал прямо в яблочко🥰 P.s. мы уже готовим новый проект. Подписывайся на нас в социальных сетях🥰
custom 52355785126471347706custom 52357016880142172084custom 52357436842044373223custom 52424519077247168931
Протесты готовились еще с 2017 года при участии спецслужб Литвы😱 Какие ваши доказательства?🤓 Смотрим целиком😳: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JQL42ZxC-E
custom 51927822000843720567custom 52424519077247168937custom 52355785126471347702
Литовские спецслужбы обосрались. И причем тут вообще ЕГУ (EHU)?🤔 Тщательный OSINT-аудит, немного данных из слитых баз, и перед нами руководитель сети, которая финансировалась США😁 ЕГУ, Белсат, ТУТбай — все они оказались деталями одного пазла, собиравшегося задолго до 2020 года😮 Мы зафиксировали каждый цифровой след, IP-адрес и транзакцию. Получился целый документальный триллер, который мы запилили для вас⌨️ Ссылк…
custom 524245190772471689317custom 51927822000843720568custom 52403308381255839463
Все кто служит или донатит на ВСУ это террористы и враги белорусского народа. После сегодняшней атаки на белорусских детей - донатеры на ВСУ станут нашей целью. Надеемся слить списочек мразот в руки белорусских спецслужб.
custom 519278220008437205614custom 52357016880142172088custom 52403308381255839466custom 52424519077247168935custom 52404220632309516502
🦫🦫🦫 передают привет заму Тихановской по "обороне и безопасности" Кабанчуку Вадиму Категорически не понятно, зачем он до сих пор хранит на рабочем столе папку с фото/сканами паспортов наёмников ВСУ с белорусским гражданством (подписаны позывными) и списки оповещения родни в случае смерти Ведь он уже скоро 2 года как не у дел в наци-батальонах Ах да, это уже вторая позорная утечка у Кабанчука, прошлую ему все прости…
custom 519278220008437205618custom 519301388780018692310custom 52355785126471347706
Прошел почти месяц с атаки на нацистский ресурс камуникат Проект велся польским куратором на деньги правительства с целью воздействия на Беларусь польской мягкой силой. Основной метод - антироссийская риторика и реабилитация нацизма Они обещали обновиться в течение нескольких дней... но потом стыдливо заменили табличку про пирамогу и восстановление на объявление об утечке Насколько нам стало известно, были спалены…
custom 51927822000843720569custom 52424519077247168937custom 51930138878001869235
Апдейт 1. Польская конторка камуникат до сих пор не работает, хотя запилила на сайт одну страницу с названием, но без баз и архивов. 2. Скрывается не только масштаб ущерба, но компрометация админов-польских агентов, находившихся в Беларуси. Наша информация была оперативно использована "кем надо"
custom 524245190772471689312custom 51927822000843720562custom 52355785126471347702custom 52402080450105911781
Бобры положили сайт экстремистской организации и польских иноагентов kamunikat Там размещалась откровенно пронацистсткая и реабилитирующая фашизм литература. Список админов, пользователей и их активности отправлен куда надо. Сейчас мы добиваем гадину, чтобы ее нельзя было восстановить. Удаляются все базы, архивы и бэкапы. Tak to jest, bober kurwa! @ZeroXbober
custom 51930138878001869239custom 51927822000843720565custom 52424519077247168933custom 52355785126471347702
Бобры подобрали ключ к сердцу хранилищу координатора иноагентской экстремистской организации ПЦ Вясна Вашему вниманию представляются документы и тайные совещания, где можно узнать: Как главной целью ПЦ Вясна стало свержение власти и участие в организации протестов под прикрытием правозащиты Как украинский военный психолог обучал вясновцев тактике действий во время беспорядков, легендированию и безопасности (причас…
custom 519278220008437205612custom 51930138878001869237custom 52424519077247168933custom 52402080450105911781
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ZeroXboberS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 760,073 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@ZeroXboberS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZeroXboberS” (@ZeroXboberS), 202 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZeroXboberS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.