Even axiom wants u to be protected ! Raw dog isn’t good ! https://x.com/axiomexchange/status/1989394901033979924?s=46&t=g69Iy1uVhT5e7BIg9Kd8Hg

Channel
Zero Gems
@ZeroGemsHere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
602subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002009153218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZeroGemsHere |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZeroGemsHere |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 602 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 603 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 605 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 604 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 604 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2024 to 14 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Lowkey I forgot this shit existed time to start using it again 1) https://x.com/nomoreliquidity/status/1985800934493208860?s=46&t=g69Iy1uVhT5e7BIg9Kd8Hg swap.vanish.trade/@NML If you want to trade in privacy, maybe farm chance here as well
Video, posted without a caption
Sitting at 30M ATH is like 65M
Well I guess we all love the numbers
I seen enough mental astrology bitches to know one day this might do something (or 0 idk)
I came across this Chart kinda looks cooked and ETH is dead but I threw some in earlier and by some I mean 2E for dust or moon if it comes https://x.com/numbertokeneth/status/1870748068041417077?s=46&t=g69Iy1uVhT5e7BIg9Kd8Hg https://number.club/ Looks like some mental patient build this https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd2f0F0A314C4075C421b88607655Feb34D31b3Dc
Wanted to share
I was looking thru my old self DMs https://x.com/brianleetrades/status/1727168627521319421?s=46&t=g69Iy1uVhT5e7BIg9Kd8Hg
❤2
And found this
Been moving nice hit 12M and change earlier
https://dexscreener.com/solana/FwrDhGMkpcYBF4Z2vvJYvvervqfNN5Lm2yyKngYMDFjW
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ZeroGemsHere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zero Gems” (@ZeroGemsHere), 602 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZeroGemsHere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.