Launching soon gonna ape https://t.me/Florkinomics

Channel
ZeroDayCalls
@ZeroDayCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001445087871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZeroDayCalls |
| Description | ZeroDay is bringing you some good calls |
| Created | 10 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZeroDayCalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Next tiny mcap one: Quarter Past Bitcoin https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x8e28718c5e0f70e7f75051dcf32331220be0a032 Mcap 49 USD
Lunacy launch went well, went to around 10x buying with poocoin, will be keeping my eye on it https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x68dc096f9de9d293051c660a7351c6680a693ce0
This will be interesting: https://t.me/Lunacy_official Dev is safe, some good callers backing it
Next tiny cap play: Mcap 41 usd https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x14a7d75b6537be76888c156610aa6e32c00601a3 https://t.me/BabyBitcoinHalfBSC LP locked for a month
Update, it has done 1000x already and will likely send much harder. Community is great: https://t.me/solanahalf Max wallet was increased from 0.1% to 1%
Solana 0.5 (BSC) - $39 mc Erectile is the dev, max bag is $0.05 so just a fun degen one https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x225e30dc45cdf8619dfa48824f04b3f4e488971d https://t.me/solanahalf
https://t.me/+S8aQlNj1RcEwNTZk Pola launchin again this one will be good Sniping is not the best idea on that one 😄
Zoro launched this one: https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x13c4fd7321214542065a592b400f4421ec5d96c6 https://t.me/ETHHALVE Edit: added TG
Good dev. Good name and logo, likely good reversal play @DCAPortal https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x254708f426ef8cc76d5ad5d4ffde6a3e8a2fd310
Channel name was changed to «xBeaztCalls»
Dev is doing like 3-4 projects a week. So this will be likely quick play, likely good to buy if it dips really hard https://t.me/Bitcoinv2launch
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ZeroDayCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ZeroDayCalls named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZeroDayCalls” (@ZeroDayCalls), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZeroDayCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.