Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Zensus2022-Grundsteuer Kanal

@Zensus_2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,800subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701655722
TypeChannel
Username@Zensus_2022
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zensus_2022

Growth

6,8006,8096,804.57 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,807 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,800 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,799–6,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:256,800-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:356,802-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:166,807-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:156,809no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:086,809first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47m 44s
Average length
15m 55s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

907 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49554.6%
12413.7%
👏748.16%
🔥687.50%
👎454.96%
🤬293.20%
🤮131.43%
💯111.21%
🖕111.21%
🙏111.21%
🎉80.882%
😁50.551%
💩30.331%
🤡30.331%
🤔20.221%
🤪20.221%
👌10.11%
🤷‍♂10.11%
🥱10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 907reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2026, 02:43 UTC≈4,760 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Praktischer Mehrwert des Videos: Am Ende erklärt Lederer konkret, wie Betroffene sich auf diese Musterprozesse berufen können: Mit Vorlagen von PepperPapers.de (kostenpflichtig) kann man ein ruhendes Verfahren beantragen und die eigene Grundsteuerfestsetzung aussetzen, bis die Musterklagen entschieden sind. Ziel: Keine voreilige Zahlung oder Einspruch, solange die Verfassungsmäßigkeit noch geklärt wird. Zielgruppe &

19🤪2🤷‍♂1

Signed Bastian

25 Apr 2026, 02:43 UTC≈4,140 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Zusammenfassung und ausführliche Detaillierung des YouTube-Videos Link zum Video: https://youtu.be/muXP3d7bHhQ (oder vollständig: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muXP3d7bHhQ) Metadaten (Stand: kurz nach Veröffentlichung am 25. April 2026): Titel: Grundsteuer vor Gericht I DAS ist im Gerichtssaal WIRKLICH passiert! Kanal: TaxPro GmbH (Steuerrechts-Experten aus Frankfurt am Main, geführt u. a. von Rechtsanwältin Patriz

19👍2

Signed Bastian

11 Apr 2026, 16:16 UTC≈6,910 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Das folgende Video befasst sich mit einem Gesetzesentwurf zur Modernisierung des Städtebaurechts, der weitreichende Konsequenzen für Immobilienbesitzer in Deutschland haben könnte. ​Enteignung 2026? Neues Gesetz erlaubt Zugriff auf Ihr Haus! (2026-04-10) ​Das Video der Kanzlei TaxPro GmbH, präsentiert von Rechtsanwältin Patrizia Lederer, thematisiert den Entwurf des "Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Städtebau- und Rau

👎2313🔥6

Signed Bastian

3 Apr 2026, 20:14 UTC≈10,700 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Bargeld & Finanzamt: BFH stoppt Schätzungen (2026-04-03) ​Das Video der Kanzlei TaxPro (RA Patrizia Lederer) thematisiert ein wegweisendes Urteil des Bundesfinanzhofs (BFH) zum Thema Steuerschätzungen bei Bargeldbetrieben. Der Fokus liegt auf der Unzulässigkeit von Schätzungen, die auf geheimen oder nicht offengelegten Vergleichsdaten basieren. ​Zusammenfassung des Videoinhalts ​Eine selbstständige Prostituierte aus

👍309👌1🔥1😁1

Signed Bastian

13 Dec 2025, 21:25 UTC≈10,800 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/jFfLp9x4U5E

👏48👍119

Signed Bastian

22 Feb 2025, 15:25 UTC≈17,800 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/jkpyC7xETos?si=LXXl-WpHzmK8o4kl

18🤮11👍6

Signed Bastian

14 Feb 2025, 17:41 UTC≈17,600 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/URCsjKXpV1E?si=I4qHR3izF5A2alXY

👍37💯9🙏64

Signed Bastian

3 Feb 2025, 20:10 UTC≈17,600 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/OV80BEkn5zU?si=Y4pCb4En88DARFVt

👎20👍9🖕95

Signed Bastian

25 Jan 2025, 07:00 UTC≈16,200 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kurzum: Ja, wenn Gesetze oder Bescheide so oft geändert oder so kryptisch formuliert werden, dass die Adressaten sie nicht mehr mit vertretbarem Aufwand verstehen können, kann das gegen das Bestimmtheitsgebot verstoßen. In der Praxis schauen die Gerichte aber genau auf den Einzelfall: Wie klar war die Regelung bei sorgfältiger Lektüre wirklich? Gibt es Hilfestellungen oder Auslegungshilfen? Erst wenn das alles nicht

👍152🖕1

Signed Bastian

25 Jan 2025, 07:00 UTC≈6,670 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ein Bescheid darf nicht so formuliert sein, dass sein Inhalt ohne größeren Interpretationsaufwand unklar bleibt. Es ist aber zulässig, bestimmte Ausführungen mit Verweis auf Rechtsgrundlagen zu treffen, wenn diese Rechtsgrundlagen selbst klar genug sind. Beispiel: Eine Baugenehmigung muss eindeutig beschreiben, welche Baumaßnahmen genehmigt sind. Eine bestimmte Fachsprache kann notwendig sein, ist aber nicht zu verwe

👍18🙏2🖕1

Signed Bastian

25 Jan 2025, 07:00 UTC≈7,280 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ich möchte gerne noch einmal zum allgemeinen Verständnis das Bestimmtheisgebot erörtern. Dieses leitet sich Aus Art, 20 Abs. 3 ab. (kurz formuliert: Alle müssen sich an Recht und Gesetz halten und das Gesetz muss für einen durchschnittlich informierten Bürger verständlich sein) Damit Ihr jetzt einschätzen könnte, ob das Bestimmtheitsgebot in Eurem Fall verletzt wurde. Aus meiner Sicht verletzen fast alle Bescheide di

👍227🙏2😁1

Signed Bastian

25 Jan 2025, 07:00 UTC≈10,400 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Die Grenze ist überschritten, wenn ein durchschnittlich informierter Mensch selbst mit zumutbarem Aufwand nicht mehr ermitteln kann, was gerade gilt. In der Praxis wird ein Bürger oft auf Informationen, z. B. auf offiziellen Internetseiten (Landesregierungen, Gesundheitsämter) oder Hotlines, zurückgreifen. Solange diese leicht zugänglich und verlässlich sind, könnte man argumentieren, dass die Verordnungen noch hinre

👍171🙏1

Signed Bastian

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zensus_2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,072,927 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zensus2022-Grundsteuer Kanal” (@Zensus_2022), 6,800 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zensus_2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.