27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,936–13,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 23:58
12,996
-36
3 Sept 2026, 20:17
13,032
-26
2 Sept 2026, 10:33
13,058
-10
1 Sept 2026, 07:58
13,068
-14
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
13,082
-7
30 Aug 2026, 13:33
13,089
-17
29 Aug 2026, 09:56
13,106
-11
28 Aug 2026, 07:58
13,117
-11
27 Aug 2026, 05:27
13,128
-9
26 Aug 2026, 08:25
13,137
-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:08
13,149
-16
24 Aug 2026, 00:09
13,165
-42
22 Aug 2026, 04:48
13,207
-16
20 Aug 2026, 21:02
13,223
-11
19 Aug 2026, 18:52
13,234
-11
18 Aug 2026, 18:52
13,245
-24
17 Aug 2026, 15:28
13,269
-12
16 Aug 2026, 08:05
13,281
-24
14 Aug 2026, 19:16
13,305
-20
13 Aug 2026, 12:06
13,325
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 40s
Average length
2m 20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
127
72.6%
❤
43
24.6%
👍
5
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨On March 26, 2026, at approximately 9AM ET, a significant amount of $ROCK tokens were stolen from the Zenrock foundation on zrChain. We are investigating and here are the facts as we understand them now.
A sophisticated attacker identified and exploited a vulnerability in zrChain's authorization logic. This exploit allowed the attacker to move $ROCK tokens from internal wallets without authorization.
We want to ma…
Here’s why the wBTC supply has been taking a hit. In this article, we share a few thoughts on what’s driving BTC holders to explore safer, non-custodial alternatives to wrapped BTC.
Full Read Here
Do not let your Bitcoin sit idle.
12% APY with zenBTC, the best Bitcoin on Solana is up for grabs.
https://x.com/Loopscale/status/2026659716190056555?s=20
ICYMI: The Zenrock Litepaper is live 👇
https://docs.zenrocklabs.io/zenrock-litepaper.pdf
Zenrock is building decentralized custody and privacy infrastructure on Solana and $ROCK captures value from all of it.
What's live:
🟠 zenBTC: Decentralized wrapped BTC on Solana. No lending, no vaults. Yield paid in real sats daily, funded by protocol fees.
🤫 Hush: Solana's privacy layer. Shield, transfer, and unshield with…
We got rugged but the privacy revolution will be televised.
We’ve rescheduled the privacy szn space with @ad1_onchain, @Jack_Krevitt1, & @jito_sol for 2/17 at 12p ET.
Set a reminder here:👇
https://x.com/i/status/2021273538078834710
@everyone
ICYMI: Zenrock January Recap📍
Here were some of the major updates:
✓ We integrated ManifestTrade’s onchain order book bringing deeper liquidity for $ROCK and $zenBTC on Solana.
✓ We launched Solana’s first yield-bearing 10x leveraged BTC market through
zenBTC_Official in partnership with Mooncake_fi × RateX_Dex
(with zenBTC liquidity on Mooncake reaching ~36% APY).
✓ We resolved recent $ROCK liquidity issues and …
Privacy is becoming core infrastructure for crypto.
On ZR Talks Ep.12, Zenrock CTO @zkshulgin joins @ad1_onchain and @Jack_Krevitt1 to break down @Hushprotocol_ , how it enables private onchain activity while still earning yield, and how AI-driven development, zrChain, and zero-knowledge proofs are shaping what comes next.
Watch the full episode 👇
Here
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zenrockannouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When it comes to BTC yield in Defi, what is most important to you?
Trackable41%
Sustainable65%
Big APY29%
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 26 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Zenrockannouncements named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ad1_onchain named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
@jack_krevitt1 named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
@jito_sol named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@hushprotocol_ named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
@zkshulgin named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Official Zenrock Announcements” (@Zenrockannouncements), 12,996 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zenrockannouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.