Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zelzo Ads

Channel

Zelzo Ads

@ZelzoAds

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004328246826
TypeChannel
Username@ZelzoAds
Created24 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded30 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZelzoAds

Growth

10302030 September 2026 — 10 subscribers30 September 2026 — 10 subscribers5 October 2026 — 21 subscribers14 October 2026 — 30 subscribers30 September 202614 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 02:5030+9
5 Oct 2026, 18:5721+11
30 Sept 2026, 21:2210no change
30 Sept 2026, 20:4710first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1504.0%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
451
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held10 (24 September 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total2,256
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC115 views0 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @V2rayNGcnfg

سلام ، مجموعه ما از سرویس مدیریت تبلیغات تلگرام ادز Zelzo به مدت طولانی استفاده کرده و بصورت کامل از هر لحاظ راضی بودیم . https://t.me/ZelzoAds September 30, 2026 کامنت مشتری : سلام و وقت بخیر 🌹 مجموعه ما برای مدت طولانی از خدمات مدیریت و اجرای تبلیغات تلگرام ادز Zelzo استفاده کرده و در این مدت از عملکرد این مجموعه، کیفیت خدمات و پشتیبانی، کاملاً رضایت داشتیم. تجربه همکاری ما با Zelzo بسیار مثبت بوده و رو…

30 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTCviews —

Zelzo Ads pinned «تعرفه تبلیغات تخصصی 50 کا ویو - 10 گرام (GRAM) 100 کا ویو - 19 گرام 200 کا ویو - 37 گرام 400 کا ویو - 73 گرام بدلیل هزینه ها و جذب قابل شهود کمتر از 50 کا ویو معذوریم . نکته : با انجام دادن مأموریت هایی میتونید تخفیف ویژه بصورت موقت یا…»

30 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC116 viewsread 30 September 2026

مأموریت های حال حاضر برای گرفتن تخفیف : معرفی مشتری جدیدی که سفارش اش را نهایی کند ده درصد مبلغ اولین سفارش اش تخفیف خواهید گرفت ، باید مشتری معرف خود را اعلام کند . پس از یک ماه تبلیغ مداوم و استفاده از خدمات ما می‌توانید در چنل خود اعلام رضایت کنید تا 5 درصد تخفیف دائمی تا زمانی که پست در چنل شما وجود داشته باشد برای همان چنل برخوردار بشید . (اختیاری)

30 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 30 September 2026

تعرفه تبلیغات تخصصی 50 کا ویو - 10 گرام (GRAM) 100 کا ویو - 19 گرام 200 کا ویو - 37 گرام 400 کا ویو - 73 گرام بدلیل هزینه ها و جذب قابل شهود کمتر از 50 کا ویو معذوریم . نکته : با انجام دادن مأموریت هایی میتونید تخفیف ویژه بصورت موقت یا دائمی برخوردار بشید . برای ثبت سفارش و سوالات به دایرکت مسیج چنل پیام بدید . https://t.me/ZelzoAds

30 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC107 viewsread 30 September 2026

درود ما یک تیم تخصصی مدیریت تبلیغات تلگرام ادز هستیم که فعلا فقط در موضوع فروش کانفیگ / فیلترشکن فعالیت میکنیم . تفاوت ما با رقبا : کمیسیون فوق رقابتی و ارزان کیفیت و جذب فوق‌العاده پشتیبانی حرفه ای منابع با کیفیت و به روز با بیش از 1000 چنل و بات همکار و رقیب آماده استفاده برای تارگت تبلیغات .

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ZelzoAds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zelzo Ads” (@ZelzoAds), 30 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZelzoAds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.