Channel
@ZaviCryptoChannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,574subscribers
-547 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001361931453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZaviCryptoChannel |
| Created | 11 February 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZaviCryptoChannel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:44 | 8,574 | -20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 8,594 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 8,609 | -23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 8,632 | -54 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 8,686 | -75 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 8,761 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 8,774 | -12 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 8,786 | -37 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 8,823 | -42 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 8,865 | -72 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 8,937 | -22 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 8,959 | -19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 8,978 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 9,007 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 9,030 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 9,043 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 9,057 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 9,074 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 9,099 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 9,113 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 11 February 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (11 February 2018 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
This was half way through the trade. Who can guess my profits? 🤣 PREMIUM GROUP GOT BOTH OF THESE CALLS AT THE SAME ENTRY PRICES. 🧠🫡
Proof is in the pudding. #ZaviWins Simple but effective. 🧠
Update on the $100k to $1M Challenge, we’re currently at $182k from the two calls I dropped in the premium. 🧠 More importantly, $BTC has reached new all-time highs—no coincidence given Trump’s influence on the markets. I have been more focused on the future calls over the past week. In the premium, I been actively capitalizing on market moves sparked by recent election events—the #TRUMP effect.
Following amounts invested in $CNET from my entry call would be: $5,000 = $11,500 $10,000 = $23,000 $25,000 = $57,500 $50,000 = $115,000 💎💎💎💎
2.3X in under 24 hours on the $CNET call. 🫡
So on Tuesday I announced my first trade and purchased $30k USDT worth of $CNET at $0.0066. This signal was dropped in the premium group.
Photo, posted without a caption
I have announced that I will be starting a challenge where I start with $100k and trading it all the way to $1m. All of my trades will be shared in the premium group in live time. I will also be dropping updates on the challenge here! Sit back and enjoy the show. 🫡
I have been posting regularly on my snapchat but will also be posting content here from now on.
Feel free to add me on Snapchat @zaviwins for daily updates and a glimpse into my day-to-day life!
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ZaviCryptoChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zavi’s Crypto Channel” (@ZaviCryptoChannel), 8,574 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZaviCryptoChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.