Channel
@Zaraban_4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001875989844 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zaraban_4 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zaraban_4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 202 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 198 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 198 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,523 |
| Reactions total | 88 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 47.7% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 4.55% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
زندگی در پرتو اسماء الهی(۱) المُجیب؛ آنکه پیش از زبان، صدای دل را میشنود برای آغاز این مجموعه، نام «المُجیب» را برگزیدم؛ نه بیدلیل. سالها پیش، در دوران دانشجویی، شرح این نام را از زبان استادم شنیدم؛ و آن روز، چیزی از «المُجیب» در دلم نشست که با گذشت سالها، هنوز از خاطرم نرفته است. بعضی از نامهای الله را فقط میشنویم؛ اما بعضی را یکبار میشنویم و بعد، سالهاست که با ما زندگی میکنند... المُجیب، برای من از …
❤2
آغاز یک همراهی با نامهای خدا... در میان شلوغیهای زندگی، گاهی بیش از هر چیز به یادآوری نیاز داریم، به یادآوریِ خدایی که نامهایش هرکدام دریچهای از آرامش، امید و شناختاند. از امروز، به یاری خدا، مجموعهای را آغاز میکنیم با عنوان: «زندگی در پرتو اسماء الهی» در این مسیر، هر روز با یکی از نامهای زیبای پروردگار همراه میشویم؛ نه فقط برای دانستنِ یک نام، بلکه برای آنکه ببینیم چگونه شناخت اسماء خدا میتواند نگاه م…
❤4
شاید بلندترین نشانهی اخلاص این باشد که انسان، حتی از اخلاصِ خود نیز احساس مالکیت نکند؛ هر خیری را تنها توفیقی از جانب خدا بداند..! @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤3
امام ابن قیم جوزی رحمه الله میگوید: «بیشتر سلف صالح و غالب احادیث بر این نظرند که ساعت استجابت دعا، در اواخر عصر جمعه است». 📚زاد المعاد ۱۰۴ برای هم دعا کنیم...🤍🤲🏻 @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤3
جمعه، بهانهای است برای تازه کردن محبت نسبت به برترین انسان تاریخ؛ همان پیامبری که با مهربانی دلها را زنده کرد، با اخلاقش جهانی را دگرگون ساخت و رحمتش همه انسانها را دربر گرفت. اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على نبينا محمد ﷺ @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤4
یادآوری برای خودم و شما 🤍 سورهی مبارکهی کهف را فراموش نکنیم... @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤1🤩1
پیش از اینها، نوشتههایم را با خطی نسبتاً خوب و رسمی، با حوصله و دقت، روی دفتری مینوشتم و برای خودم نگه میداشتم. دفتری هم داشتم که نامههایم به خدا را در آن مینوشتم؛ با خطی خوشتر از خطی که هر روز مینوشتم. برگهایش را یکییکی از دفتر جدا میکردم و در چاهی که گوشهی حیاط سالها بیاستفاده مانده بود، میانداختم؛ گویی مطمئن بودم هیچ نامهای که برای خدا نوشته شود، گم نمیشود. حالا بیشتر اینجا مینویسم و گاهی فقط …
🕊3
– پس با کی راحت حرف میزنی؟ + با خدا... تنها کسی که پیش از آنکه لب بگشایی، دردت را میداند؛ اشکهایت را پیش از آنکه بر گونه بنشینند، میشمارد؛ و سکوتت را بهتر از تمامِ حرفهای دنیا میفهمد. گاهی گمان میکنی پاسخی نشنیدهای، اما ناگهان، بارِ دلت سبک میشود، ترسی فرو میریزد و نوری آرام در تاریکیِ جانت میتابد... شاید این، زیباترین پاسخِ خدا باشد. #رزق_دل @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤2🕊2⚡1
📚از تاریخ بیاموزیم! حاکمان دانا از جنگ پرهیز میکنند، نه از ترس شکست، بلکه به دلیل نگرانی از ویرانی کشورشان، حتی در صورت پیروزی. آنها میدانند که جنگ، حتی با پیروزی، هزینههای سنگین و جبرانناپذیری بر ملت تحمیل میکند. ویرانهای که جنگ به جا میگذارد، پیروزی را بیارزش میکند. ویرانی و اندوه مردم، حتی در پیروزی، شکست است. وقتی اسکندر مقدونی به چین رسید، در محل فرماندهی لشکر، با سردارانش مشغول گفتگو بود که دربان آم…
❤2✍1
واقعاً عجیبه... گاهی بهترین آدمها، بدترین انتخابها رو میکنن. فکر میکنم زیادی خوب بودن، آدم رو نسبت به بدیِ دیگران نابینا میکنه. وقتی خودت اهل صداقت و مهربونی باشی، سخت میتونی باور کنی یکی از روی خودخواهی، دروغ یا بیرحمی رفتار میکنه. شاید برای همین، گاهی بهترین زنها بدترین مردها رو انتخاب میکنن و بهترین مردها بدترین زنها رو. #تفکرات @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
❤🔥5
عینک نمیزد که نگن عینکیه یه روز چالهی جلو پاش رو ندید و خورد زمین... از اون روز به بعد چلاق صداش میکردن! 📌برای خودت زندگی کن!!! @Zaraban_4 | ضربان
👍2⚡1👌1
بعضی وقتها دوست داری بخوابی و دیگه بیدار نشی، اما باز بیخیال این فکرها میشی. پشت سرت کلی شلوغی هست که بهتره باشی. آخه کی قراره باز اینا رو جمع و جور کنه... بزرگ شدن این شکلیه. حتی فکر مردن هم راحت نیست. حتی اگه تلخ بنویسی کلی آدم ازت ناامید میشن. بخند پیرمرد. به فکر بقیه باش. برای بقیه زندگی کن.
❤5🏆1👏1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zaraban_4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 727,589 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ضربان” (@Zaraban_4), 202 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zaraban_4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.