Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zamaznoy LC

Channel

Zamaznoy LC

@Zamaznoy_LC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,052subscribers

+641 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002617912979
TypeChannel
Username@Zamaznoy_LC
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zamaznoy_LC

Growth

6,4117,1386,774.57 August 2026 — 6,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,709 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,130 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,138 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,105 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,075 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,052 subscribers7,0527 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 18 days, net +641. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,302–7,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:157,052-23
21 Aug 2026, 05:357,075-30
17 Aug 2026, 20:267,105-33
14 Aug 2026, 14:067,138+8
10 Aug 2026, 17:437,130+421
7 Aug 2026, 15:306,709+298
7 Aug 2026, 05:466,411first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 7,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held47 (27 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total82,470
Reactions total1,327
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31m 53s
Average length
6m 23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,358 reactions across 47 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥37227.4%
👍36927.2%
27920.5%
👏715.23%
💯564.12%
🐳523.83%
😱483.53%
🤯211.55%
😨161.18%
😭161.18%
👻80.589%
🙏80.589%
🍾50.368%
👀50.368%
🤔50.368%
🤓40.295%
🥴40.295%
30.221%
🎉30.221%
🏆30.221%
9 further kinds100.736%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 47 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Zamaznoy_LC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC433 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🇨🇳 World Humanoid Robot Games. Китай проведёт Олимпиаду гуманоидных роботов. С 22 по 26 августа в Пекине пройдут масштабные соревнования, в которых заявлено 2 056 гуманоидных роботов из 16 стран. ➡️ Роботы будут бегать, играть в футбол, заниматься единоборствами, работать на производстве, выполнять задачи в отелях и даже тушить пожары. В ряде дисциплин роботы должны самостоятельно распознавать окружающую среду, ор

👍11😨83🔥3🏆1🥴1

20 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC498 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇳 🤖 Китайская компания, производящая гуманоидных роботов, за один день получила капитализацию $50 млрд. 19 августа Unitree Robotics вышла на Шанхайскую биржу и получила рост +460% за первый день. Unitree, основана в 2016 году Ваном Синсином. Его первый робот был собран ещё во время учёбы, примерно из $30 деталей. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ Первая цена за робота начинается от $13,500, что значительно дешевле, чем у запад

👍6🔥4😱3💯1🥴1

19 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC664 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

‼️ Продолжаем двигаться по разгаданным шифрам журнала The Economist — THE WORLD AHEAD 2026. 6. Появятся первые реально работающие mRNA-вакцины против рака. Тогда я написал: Это не фантастика — это то что уже произошло в будущем. Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ‼️ И БУУУУММММ!!! Сегодня это произошло. Moderna и Merck объявили о первом в истории положительном результате III фазы для персонализированной

7👍7🔥5🐳1👏1🥴1

18 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC765 views25 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Video

▶️ Перевёл для вас фрагмент выступления Йошуа Бенджио. Это один из людей, стоявших у истоков современного ИИ, лауреат премии Тьюринга и один из самых влиятельных исследователей в истории машинного обучения. ‼️ У них будет стимул избавиться от нас… 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ Бенджио объяснил, почему его пугает не то, насколько умными становятся модели, а то на сколько растет их способность действовать самостоятельно: ➡️

👍12🔥65🍾1🎉1

18 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC727 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Продолжаем двигаться по разгаданным шифрам журнала The Economist — THE WORLD AHEAD 2026. 5. Спорт = политика. Футболист который бьет лазером, мячи, стадионы, другие виды спорта. Футболист с лазером намекает на политизацию спорта. Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ➡️ Трамп одним звонком отменил красную карточку на Чемпионате Мира по футболу 2026. ➡️ Так же состоялся первый в истории турнир UFC в Белом

👍7🔥6😱53👏3

18 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC748 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🇮🇷🇴🇲 Иран и Оман формируют новую архитектуру Ормузского пролива. Стороны согласовали новый маршрут через пролив и обсуждают совместное управление движением судов, сборы и правила безопасности. ➡️ Иран добивается права ограничивать проход американских и израильских судов и вводить санкции против стран, которые он считает причинившими ему ущерб. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ Иран пытается перевести контроль над Ормузом из вое

👍107🔥6

17 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC795 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

‼️ Биг Тех залез в ИИ-обязательства на $2,6 трлн. Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta и Oracle уже подписали огромный объём контрактов на дата-центры, чипы и вычислительные мощности. ⚠️ По оценке Nikkei, около $1,65 трлн из этих обязательств находятся вне баланса. Для сравнения: весь заявленный долг этих компаний составляет, около $1,35 трлн. По показателям, компании выглядят здорово, но есть важный нюанс: ➡️ значи

🔥10👍43🍾2🎉1👏1

17 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC831 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026

4. Мечи Возможно это символ политических дуэлей и борьбы элит, которая идёт не только на войне, но и в кабинетах власти. Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ⚔️ 12 января. Трамп использует прием в виде уголовного преследования, в отношении главы ФРС Пауэлла. Читай здесь. ⚔️ 26 апреля. Реальность или фокусы? Очередная попытка покушения на Трампа. Читай здесь. ⚔️ 21 мая. Белый дом опубликовал крайне необы

🔥106👍2👏1🙈1

17 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC942 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026

3. Гигантский контейнеровоз. Намёк на глобальную торговлю, которая будет лихорадить: логистические сбои, санкции, тарифные войны. Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🌐 9 марта. Мир достиг наивысшего уровня неопределенности в истории. Ломается логистическая модель"Just-in-time". Читать здесь. 💰 13 марта. Иран пытается забрать деньги у западных страховщиков, монетизировав проход через Ормузский пролив. Читай

🔥105👍5👏3🐳1

16 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,010 views28 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

2. Античный корабль. Намёк на миграции, шаткую политику ЕС. Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🇪🇸🇲🇦 5 августа. Крупнейший миграционный кризис, более 60 тысяч человек пытаются попасть в Сеуту. Шаткая политика ЕС. Что происходит на границах Испании? Читай здесь. Я уделял мало внимания аналитике по странам ЕС. Но за последний месяц там произошло несколько событий, которые хорошо показывают, сдвиг в политике в

🔥136👍6🐳3

16 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC984 views49 reactionsread 20 August 2026

1. Эскалация конфликтов Полный разбор 👉 здесь. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🇮🇷🇺🇸 2 марта. Трамп обращается к нации и заявляет о начале полномасштабных боевых действий против Ирана. Читай здесь. 🇺🇸🇨🇳 14 апреля. Глобальное противостояние США и Китая выходит на новый уровень. Читай здесь. 🇺🇸 27 апреля. Начинают шататься американские союзы в Азии. Читай здесь. 🇨🇳 🇺🇸 23 июля. Новый виток эскалации Китай-США. Экспортные ограни

🔥24👍134👏4👀31

16 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC987 views70 reactionsread 20 August 2026

‼️Ребята, прошу вашего внимания. Прошло уже почти 9 месяцев 2026 года. Предлагаю провести промежуточные итоги. 13 ноября 2025 года я разбирал обложку журнала The Economist: The World Ahead 2026 и пытался расшифровать, что именно журнал спрятал в ней. ⚠️ Читать разбор 👉 здесь. В следующих постах пройдемся по моей прошлогодней расшифровке и сравним её с тем, что происходит и что уже произошло в 2026 году. 💬 Наскол

🔥37👍1611👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @Zamaznoy_LC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,150 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zamaznoy LC” (@Zamaznoy_LC), 7,052 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zamaznoy_LC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.