Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zaktaskop

Channel

Zaktaskop

@Zaktaskop

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,142subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620960205
TypeChannel
Usernames@xronologika @Zaktaskop
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
On Telegramt.me/Zaktaskop

Growth

11,202601.59 August 2026 — 1,202 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,200 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,188 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,153 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,150 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,142 subscribers1,1429 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:221,142+1,141
8 Sept 2026, 21:171-1,149
3 Sept 2026, 22:011,150-3
31 Aug 2026, 18:241,153-14
28 Aug 2026, 12:331,167-3
25 Aug 2026, 13:321,170-9
22 Aug 2026, 17:031,179-9
19 Aug 2026, 18:231,188-5
16 Aug 2026, 16:161,193-4
13 Aug 2026, 10:141,197-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:451,200-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:171,202first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 7 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 1,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
321
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held26 (7 August 20256 September 2026)
Views total1,927
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
4
Links
93

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2324.5%
👎2122.3%
🔥1212.8%
1010.6%
88.51%
💯55.32%
😁44.26%
🦄44.26%
👀33.19%
11.06%
🏆11.06%
👏11.06%
💋11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @ZAKOARTPhoto

🖼️ Iren Kaen d'Anver portreti (Portrait of Mademoiselle Irène Cahen d'Anvers) - 1880 🎨 Per Ogyust Renuar (Pierre-Auguste Renoir) 🖼️ Ushbu nafis portretda atigi 8 yoshli Iren Kaen d'Anver tasvirlangan. Renuar uning sokin nigohi, qizg'ish sochlari va mayin ranglar uyg'unligi orqali bolalikning beg'uborligi hamda go'zalligini mahorat bilan aks ettirgan. Asar bugungi kunda impressionizmning eng mashhur bolalar portretla

👍1

4 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC222 viewsread 9 September 2026

Dunyodagi birinchi GIGAbaytli disk 1980-yilda IBM kompaniyasi IBM 3380 nomli qattiq diskni taqdim etdi. Bu dunyodagi birinchi 1 gigabayt hajmli qattiq disk edi. U taxminan 250 kg og‘irlikda bo‘lib, o‘lchami muzlatgichga teng edi. Ushbu qurilmaning narxi 50 000 AQSh dollariga yetgan. Taqqoslash uchun, 1956-yilda ishlab chiqarilgan IBM 350 Disk Storage Unit – dunyodagi birinchi qattiq disk bo‘lib, deyarli 1 tonna og‘

2 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC257 viewsread 9 September 2026

Shokolad va Nobel Tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, shokolad iste'moli va Nobel mukofoti laureatlari soni o'rtasida ijobiy bog'liqlik mavjud. Ya'ni, aholisi ko'proq shokolad iste'mol qiladigan mamlakatlarda Nobel mukofoti sovrindorlari soni ham ko'proq bo'lishi mumkin. Biroq, bu bog'liqlikning sabablari hali to'liq o'rganilmagan. Shokolad tarkibidagi flavonoidlar miyada qon aylanishini yaxshilashi va kognitiv funksiy

1 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC304 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Nima uchun osmon moviy rangda? Kislorod gaz holatida taʼmsiz, hidsiz va rangsiz boʻladi! Lekin, u suyuq yoki qattiq holatida rasmdagidek koʻrinishda, och koʻk (moviy) rangda boʻladi. 🔎 @ZAKTASKOP - Bilimlar ummoni.

2

28 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC442 views14 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Demak kanal to'xtaylikmi? dislikelarda qaraganda kanal ko'pchilikda maqul kelmas ekan. 🔎 @ZAKTASKOP - Bilimlar ummoni.

👍10👀3👎1

24 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC551 views31 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Assalomu alaykum hurmatli obunachilar kanalni faollashtiraylikmi? 🔎 @ZAKTASKOP - Bilimlar ummoni.

👎18🔥8💯5

18 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 9 September 2026
Poll

Hurmatli obunachilar kanalimiz ko'proq qaysi yo'nalishda faoliyat olib borsin

  1. San'at, art17%
  2. Adabiyot21%
  3. Fakt30%
  4. Tarix20%
  5. Sport11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jan 2026, 01:42 UTC669 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SiyoxdonPhoto

🖼️ "Thetis Dipping Achilles into the River Styx" (Fetida Axillesni Styx daryosiga botirmoqda) 1630-1635. 🎨 Piter Paul Rubens. 👉 Ushbu rasmda yunon mifologiyasidagi muhim voqea tasvirlangan: Axillesning onasi, dengiz maʼbudasi Fetida, uni Styx daryosiga botirib, tanasini yaroqsiz qilishga harakat qilmoqda. Ammo u chaqalogʻini tovonidan ushlab turganligi sababli, bu joy himoyalanmay qoladi va Axillesning yagona zaif j

👍1💋1

13 Jan 2026, 15:19 UTC584 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Rassomlik yo‘nalishidagi kanallar ko‘p,adabiyotga bag‘ishlangan sahifalar ham yetarlicha. Ammo so‘z va rang birlashgan makon kam. Ana shunday noyob maskanlardan biri - Siyoxdon. Bu yerda buyuk adiblar, mashhur rassomlar,san’at va adabiyot kesishgan noyob ma’lumotlar jamlangan. Zakovat savollari tuzuvchilar uchun - ilhom va ma'lumotlarga boy haqiqiy xazina. Ko‘rib chiqing, baho bering, ilhom oling. @SIYOXDON - So

1

31 Dec 2025, 04:17 UTC770 views4 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @savollar_bazaPhoto

Assalomu alaykum! Sizni kirib kelayotgan yangi 2026-yil bilan chin dildan muborakbod etgan holatda, xonadoningizga toʻkin-sochinlik,baxt-saodat,quvonch,omad,shodu-xurramlik, ushalmagan orzular ijobatini tilab qolaman.2025 yilda erishilmagan orzu-havaslaringiz, yangi yilda amalga oshsin. Umrimizning har kuni va har daqiqasi mazmunli, yutuqlarga boy bo'lsin. Kasb-koringizda beradilar, barakotlar bersin va yuzingizdan

👍2👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Zaktaskop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTCAnonymous Poll143 voters

Hurmatli obunachilar kanalimiz ko'proq qaysi yo'nalishda faoliyat olib borsin

  1. San'at, art17%
  2. Adabiyot21%
  3. Fakt30%
  4. Tarix20%
  5. Sport11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zakovat intellektual klubi
@zakovat · 28,625
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zaktaskop” (@Zaktaskop), 1,142 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zaktaskop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.