Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 51 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,144–1,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 22:00
1,146
-4
17 Sept 2026, 07:58
1,150
-2
13 Sept 2026, 09:20
1,152
-2
9 Sept 2026, 09:36
1,154
-3
4 Sept 2026, 09:37
1,157
-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:28
1,158
+3
25 Aug 2026, 20:18
1,155
+2
19 Aug 2026, 10:57
1,153
+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:54
1,152
+1
13 Aug 2026, 00:24
1,151
+3
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
1,148
-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:03
1,149
no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45
1,149
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
8
66.7%
❤
3
25.0%
👎
1
8.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
” أصبحت في القرن الحادي عشر هذه النسخة السَّعاديّة –نسبةً لابن سعادة– تُعدّ من أحباس خزانة القرويين بفاس كما شهد به صاحب المرآة، و الهلالي وهو من أهل القرن الثاني عشر كما سبق عن فهرسته. و لا زالت هناك إلى أن استعارها أواخر القرن الثاني عشر السلطان أبو عبد الله محمد بن عبد الرحمان من خزانة القرويين حسبما استفدت ذلك من مكتوبٍ كنت وقفت عليه من وزيره موسى بن أحمد يخاطب فيه قاضي فاس لحينه العلامة أبا عبد الله محمد بن عبد …
” صحيح البخاري عند جمهور علماء الإسلام أصحّ الكتب بعد القرآن، وهو على الحقيقة أجمَعُها لنظامات الإسلام وتعاليمه وتراتيبه، وأصحّ مصادره وأقربها إلى زمن البعثة المحمّدية، والبخاري قد حمل عنه كتابه الصحيح هذا نحوُ تسعين ألفا، ولكن لم يشتَهِر راوٍ عنه، ولا روايةٌ كرواية أبي عبد الله محمد بن يوسف بن مطر الفِرَبريّ (تـ 320هـ)، وكان سماعُه عليه للصحيح مرّتين، مرّة بفِرَبر سنة 248هـ، ومرّة ببُخارى سنة 252هـ، فإنّه أتقَنُ الر…
” «تخيل يا جان مارك، عندما عاد شاهد التلفزة، تخيّل! تنقّل بين القنوات إلى أن شعر بالملل، فتصفّح بعض الكتب. هكذا –وهذه عبارتها– يقضي وقته»... أتَعلَمين يا شانطال، أعشق كثيرا هذه الجُمَل البسيطة العادية الشبيهة بحلّ لغز غامض. إن قولها «يقضي وقته» جملة أساسية. ذلك أن مشكلتهم تكمُن في الزمن، في تزجية الوقت، أي في أن يَمضي الوقت من تلقاء نفسه من دون جهد، ومن دون أن يضطروا لعبوره مثل راجِل أنهكه المشي. لهذا السبب تتكلم خال…
” التفكير، في الواقع، يسبق العلم، الذي لا يفعل شيئا سوى استخدامه بطريقة أكثر منهجية. فالإنسان لا يستطيع العيش وسط الأشياء دون أن يكوّن عنها أفكارا يهتدي بها في تنظيم سلوكه. غير أنّ هذه التصورات، لأنها أقرب إلينا وأسهل تناوُلا من الحقائق التي تعبّر عنها/تُقابلها، فإننا نميل بطبيعتنا إلى إحلالها محلّ هذه الأخيرة، واتّخاذها مادّة لتأمّلاتنا. فبدلا من ملاحظة الأشياء ووصفها ومقارنتها، نكتفي بالوعي بأفكارنا عنها وتحليلها …
” – ... تذكّر هذا جيدا: ديانتنا الاحتفاء بالحياة. فلفظة «حياة» هي سلطانة الكلمات. الكلمة الملِكة المُحاطة بكلمات أخرى كبيرة. بكلمة «مغامرة»! وكلمة «مستقبل»! وكلمة «أمل»! وبالمناسبة، هل تعرف الاسم المرموز للقنبلة الذرية التي أُطلقت على هيروشيما؟ اسمها «الصبي الصغير»! من وضَع هذا الاسم عبقريّ! ليس بالإمكان العثور على اسم أفضل منه. صبيّ صغير، ولد، طفل، ما من كلمة أحنّ منها، ولا أكثر تأثيرا، ولا أشدّ امتلاء بالمستقبل.
– …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZaidOu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سحر الكتب 📚 ❤️📲 @siherkotob · 24,154 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
روح وريحان 🦋 @Omarmokhtar2002 · 30,644 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 6 September 2026
المناهج السعودية 🇸🇦 @sacourse · 21,311 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زيد اولاد زيان” (@ZaidOu), 1,146 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZaidOu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.