Channel
@ZaidOu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,151subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001199511699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZaidOu |
| Created | 27 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZaidOu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 1,151 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 1,148 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,149 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,403 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 8 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
” أصبحت في القرن الحادي عشر هذه النسخة السَّعاديّة –نسبةً لابن سعادة– تُعدّ من أحباس خزانة القرويين بفاس كما شهد به صاحب المرآة، و الهلالي وهو من أهل القرن الثاني عشر كما سبق عن فهرسته. و لا زالت هناك إلى أن استعارها أواخر القرن الثاني عشر السلطان أبو عبد الله محمد بن عبد الرحمان من خزانة القرويين حسبما استفدت ذلك من مكتوبٍ كنت وقفت عليه من وزيره موسى بن أحمد يخاطب فيه قاضي فاس لحينه العلامة أبا عبد الله محمد بن عبد …
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
في ترجمة ابن الخطيب لمن سمّاه أبا عبد الله بن عصام: ” وله أدب ضعيف المَبنى، خالٍ من المعنى، كان يسهل عليه، وينثال بين يديه “ 🙂
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
المغاربة جاهم شوية ملل وراحو يطّمنوا على سبتة
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
” صحيح البخاري عند جمهور علماء الإسلام أصحّ الكتب بعد القرآن، وهو على الحقيقة أجمَعُها لنظامات الإسلام وتعاليمه وتراتيبه، وأصحّ مصادره وأقربها إلى زمن البعثة المحمّدية، والبخاري قد حمل عنه كتابه الصحيح هذا نحوُ تسعين ألفا، ولكن لم يشتَهِر راوٍ عنه، ولا روايةٌ كرواية أبي عبد الله محمد بن يوسف بن مطر الفِرَبريّ (تـ 320هـ)، وكان سماعُه عليه للصحيح مرّتين، مرّة بفِرَبر سنة 248هـ، ومرّة ببُخارى سنة 252هـ، فإنّه أتقَنُ الر…
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
” «تخيل يا جان مارك، عندما عاد شاهد التلفزة، تخيّل! تنقّل بين القنوات إلى أن شعر بالملل، فتصفّح بعض الكتب. هكذا –وهذه عبارتها– يقضي وقته»... أتَعلَمين يا شانطال، أعشق كثيرا هذه الجُمَل البسيطة العادية الشبيهة بحلّ لغز غامض. إن قولها «يقضي وقته» جملة أساسية. ذلك أن مشكلتهم تكمُن في الزمن، في تزجية الوقت، أي في أن يَمضي الوقت من تلقاء نفسه من دون جهد، ومن دون أن يضطروا لعبوره مثل راجِل أنهكه المشي. لهذا السبب تتكلم خال…
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
😐
😁2
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
” التفكير، في الواقع، يسبق العلم، الذي لا يفعل شيئا سوى استخدامه بطريقة أكثر منهجية. فالإنسان لا يستطيع العيش وسط الأشياء دون أن يكوّن عنها أفكارا يهتدي بها في تنظيم سلوكه. غير أنّ هذه التصورات، لأنها أقرب إلينا وأسهل تناوُلا من الحقائق التي تعبّر عنها/تُقابلها، فإننا نميل بطبيعتنا إلى إحلالها محلّ هذه الأخيرة، واتّخاذها مادّة لتأمّلاتنا. فبدلا من ملاحظة الأشياء ووصفها ومقارنتها، نكتفي بالوعي بأفكارنا عنها وتحليلها …
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
” – ... تذكّر هذا جيدا: ديانتنا الاحتفاء بالحياة. فلفظة «حياة» هي سلطانة الكلمات. الكلمة الملِكة المُحاطة بكلمات أخرى كبيرة. بكلمة «مغامرة»! وكلمة «مستقبل»! وكلمة «أمل»! وبالمناسبة، هل تعرف الاسم المرموز للقنبلة الذرية التي أُطلقت على هيروشيما؟ اسمها «الصبي الصغير»! من وضَع هذا الاسم عبقريّ! ليس بالإمكان العثور على اسم أفضل منه. صبيّ صغير، ولد، طفل، ما من كلمة أحنّ منها، ولا أكثر تأثيرا، ولا أشدّ امتلاء بالمستقبل. – …
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👎1
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
فشلت 😂
Signed زيد اولاد زيان
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZaidOu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 591,703 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زيد اولاد زيان” (@ZaidOu), 1,151 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZaidOu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.