Дамы, что значит «даже»??? 😎
❤🔥4👏2🔥2🥰1

Channel
@Zahara_Harizma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
497subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002277618391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zahara_Harizma |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zahara_Harizma |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 497 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 495 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 498 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 496 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 497 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 498 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 497 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
329 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 109 | 33.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 74 | 22.5% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 17.6% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 4.86% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 3.65% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 3.65% | |
| 🌭 | 8 | 2.43% | |
| 😡 | 8 | 2.43% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.13% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.912% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.608% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.304% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Zahara_Harizma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дамы, что значит «даже»??? 😎
❤🔥4👏2🔥2🥰1
https://vimeo.com/miyudistribution/ecorchee?share=copy&fl=cl&fe=ci
🔥2❤1❤🔥1
Спонсор программы «уверенность в себе, как в самке» - фильм Двойной просчет (1999) Я так боялась, что все закончится тупо, как это могло бы быть, когда снимает мужчина женские судьбы, но! Как видите - рекомендую к просмотру! Отпишитесь, кто посмотрит и да! Не жадничайте, посоветуйте и мне фильмы про женщин, или снятые женщинами.
❤🔥6🥰2😁2
Вы это сделали! Женская сила в объединении! Быстро и безжалостно 🔥 Остановили немного зла, можно и посмотреть фильм, который я советовала выше. Можете и мне фильмов посоветовать про женщин, или снятых женщинами? Спасибо 😍
❤8🔥1
Педофилы на моём канале!!! Привет, воительницы 🤝 Зашла сюда, чтобы посоветовать вам фильм «1+1, но про женщину», «Жизнь Мадлен» 2022г Фильм, очень схожий сюжетом с мировым шедевром, но эта история про женщину с тяжелой судьбой, а сама картина, несмотря на это, по женски нежнее, глубже, сильнее. В общем, захожу писать текст и вижу, что под постом выше ублюдки оставили комментарий с ссылками на детскую порнографию. …
😡8⚡3❤1🤯1🙈1
Женщина! Привет 🩷🩷🩷 Как я забыла о своем канале? Че там по агрессии? Боялись этого слова, теперь ясно почему! Оно ассоциируется с насилием. Мама Захара все исправила 😎 Новый термин, как че, почему вот тута: https://youtu.be/rSZWd6_JhRc?is=Ib59hwm0OR_nduXN
❤10❤🔥5🔥4
Фильм «Пыль» (2005) - странный (ебанутый), гипнотический, и, если смотреть на него через призму психофизиологии, довольно показательный. Меня зацепил фильм: хуйня, которая происходит с героем - канонична 😁. И здесь важно сказать честно - с точки зрения психофизиологии женского организма подобный сценарий почти невозможен. (Я всю жизнь бежала от публичных таких высказываний, но дамы, просто признайтесь, можете ли Вы …
❤12🔥4⚡2🏆1👏1
Агрессия - это импульс действия: защитить, остановить, изменить. Подавленная агрессия - это уже последствия, когда импульс возник, но был остановлен и не реализован. Подавленнная агрессия - разлад в регуляции. Организм инициирует мобилизацию: повышается тонус, внимание собирается в точку, тело готовит движение. Этот контур рассчитан на завершение - на действие, которое разряжает напряжение и закрывает ситуацию. Ко…
❤🔥9❤4🏆2🥰2
«Психология против женщин» - мой лекционный материал. Современная психология не для счастья женщин, а для встраивания женщины в систему, построенную на культе власти и насилия. И если после прочтения слова «мизогиния» резко захочется перелистнуть этот пост: поздравляю - диагностика на мизогинию завершена, заключение: она у тебя есть. Кто остался, погнали, Богини: психофизиологически мизогиния - это выученное искаже…
❤17🔥7❤🔥5🥰3💔1
Самопохвала за мелочи ☺️ С нейробиологической точки зрения самопохвала за мелкие действия работает через три системы. 1. Мезолимбическая дофаминовая система ☺️ Любое зафиксированное достижение активирует вентральную область покрышки и прилежащее ядро. Даже небольшой успех даёт дофаминовый сигнал «поведение ценно». Это усиливает связь между действием и вознаграждением и повышает вероятность повторения. 2. Нейро…
👍10🔥7❤5🌭1🥰1
Чувста нужно переживать максимально, ничего не подавлять- страдать, плакать, ЗЛИТЬСЯ, а потом идти, бежать, стоять дальше 💛
💯9👏4❤3❤🔥2👍2🌭1
Как называется, если когда (ЕСЛИ КОГДА!!! 😭😄) мне больно или плохо, я начинаю очень сильно материться? Это называется аффективная вербальная разрядка с агрессивной экспрессией. Когда боль (физическая или эмоциональная) резко превышает порог выносимости, нервная система уходит в аффект. Когнитивные способы регуляции временно недоступны, и организм выбирает самый быстрый и энергоёмкий выход - вербальную агрессию, час…
❤11❤🔥6🔥6🥰2🌭1💘1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Zahara_Harizma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌶Захара🌶 Психофизиология” (@Zahara_Harizma), 497 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zahara_Harizma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.